A növekedéssel kapcsolatos kihívások és kontextuális kettős képesség
A felső vezetők (TMT) integráltságának vizsgálata
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2021.09.03Kulcsszavak:
kontextuális kettős képesség, növekedéssel kapcsolatos kihívások, felsővezetői csapatAbsztrakt
A folyamatos szervezeti alkalmazkodáshoz és növekedéshez szükséges, hogy a szervezet képes legyen kezelni az ellentéteket, mint például stabilitás és megújulás, kiaknázás és felfedezés. A szakirodalom szerint ennek érdekében a vállalatoknak el kell érniük a kettős képesség (együttes felfedezés és kiaknázás) valamilyen szintjét. A felső vezetésnek kiemelt szerepe van a kettős képesség megteremtésében, elősegítésében, egy megfelelően támogató szervezeti kontextus kialakításával. Jelen kutatás azt vizsgálja, hogyan befolyásolja a felsővezetői csapat magatartásbeli integráltsága (felfedezés- és kiaknázásorientáció tekintetében) a növekedéssel kapcsolatos kihívások jelenlétét a szervezeten belül. A növekedéssel kapcsolatos kihívások a szervezeti diszfunkciók olyan észlelt tünetei, melyek a nagyfokú növekedés eredményeként jöttek létre. E cikk egy pilot kutatás eredményeit ismerteti, kvantitatív módszerekkel elemzi, hogy azok a vállalatok, melyek felső vezetése nem integrált, szignifikánsabban magasabb stresszel, szervezetlenséggel és feszültségekkel jellemezhetők. A szerzők kutatásukban magyar tulajdonú vállalatok felső vezetőit kérdezték meg, minden mintába bekerülő vállalat esetében három vezetővel készítettek kérdőívet. Az adatelemzés során klaszterelemzést és kétmintás próbákat végeztek.
Letöltések
Hivatkozások
Amankwah-Amoah, J. & Adomako, S. (2021). The effects of knowledge integration and contextual ambidexterity on innovation in entrepreneurial ventures, Journal of Business Research, 127(April), 312–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.050
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Bartlett, C. A. & Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Birkinshaw, J. & Gupta, K. (2013). Clarifying The Distinctive Contribution of Ambidexterity to the Field of Organization Studies. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 287-298. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0167
Bromiley, P. & Rau, D. (2016). Social, behavioral, and cognitive influences on upper echelons during strategy process: a literature review. Journal of Management, 42(1), 174-202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315617240
Brown, S. L. & Eisenhardt, K. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393807
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. (1998). Competing on the edge: Strategy as structured chaos. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Burgelman, R. A. (2002). Strategy as vector and the inertia of coevolutionary lock-in. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(2), 325-357. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094808
Burgelman, R.A. (1991). Intraorganisational Ecology of Strategy Making and Organizational Adaption: Theory and Field Research. Organizational Science, 2(3), 239-262. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.3.239
Carmeli, A. (2008). Top management team behavioral integration and the performance of service organizations. Group & Organization Management, 33(6), 712−735. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601108325696
Carmeli, A. & Halevi, M. Y. (2009). How top management team behavioral integration and behavioral complexity enable organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of contextual ambidexterity. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(2), 207-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.01.011
Chen, J. & Liu, L. (2020). Reconciling temporal conflicts in innovation ambidexterity: the role of TMT temporal leadership. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(8), 1899-1920. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2019-0555
Chen, J., Miller, D. & Chen, M-J. (2019). Top management team time horizon blending and organizational ambidexterity. Strategic Organization, 19(2), 183-206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127019883669
Csedő, Z., Zavarkó, M. & Sára, Z. (2019). Tudásmenedzsment és stratégiai kettős képesség – Felsővezetői döntések elemzése az innovációs stratégia megvalósítása során. Vezetéstudomány, 50(3), 36-49. https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2019.03.04
Dewar, R. D. & Dutton, J. E. (1986). The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 32(11), 1422-1433. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1422
Fauchart, E. & Keilbach, M. (2009). Testing a model of exploration and exploitation as innovation strategies. Small Business Economics, 33(3), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-008-9101-6
Flamholtz, E.F. & Hua, W. (2002). Strategic Organizational Development, Growing Pains and Corporate Financial Performance. European Management Journal, 20(5), 527-536. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0263-2373(02)00098-1
Flamholtz, E.G. & Kurland, S. (2005). Strategic Organizational Development, Infrastructure, and Financial Performance: An Empirical Investigation. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 3(2), 117-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-7871(05)14006-4
Flamholtz, E.G. & Randle, Y. (2016). Growing Pains: Building Sustainably Successful Organizations. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119176466.ch2
Floyd, S. & Lane, P. (2000). Strategizing throughout the organization: Managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 154-177. https://doi.org/10.2307/259268
Georgakakis, D., Greve, P., & Ruigrok, W. (2017). Top management team faultlines and firm performance: Examining the CEO-TMT interface. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(6), 741-758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.03.004
Ghoshal, S. & Bartlett, C. (1994). Linking organizational context and managerial action: The dimensions of quality in management. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S2), 91-112. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250151007
Gibson, C.B. & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209-226. https://doi.org/10.5465/20159573
Greiner, L. E. (1972). Evolution and revolution as organizations grow. Harvard Business Review, 50, 37-46. Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G. & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 693-706. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22083026
Hambrick, D. C. (1994). Top management groups: A conceptual integration and reconsideration of the ‘team’ label. In B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (171−214). Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press.
Hortoványi L. (2012). Entrepreneurial Management. Budapest: Aula Kiadó.
Hortoványi, L., Füzes, P. & Szabó, Zs. R. (2019). A szervezeti figyelem irányítása kettős képességű szervezetben. Vezetéstudomány, 50(10), 74-86. https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2019.10.07
Jansen, J. J. P., George, G., Van den Bosch, F. A. & Volberda, H. W. (2008). Senior team attributes and organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of transformational leadership. Journal of Management Studies, 45(5), 982-1007. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00775.x
Korvaka, O., Lockettb, A., Haytonb, J., Nicolaoud, N. & Moleb, K. (2017). Disentangling the antecedents of ambidexterity: exploration and exploitation. Research Policy, 47(2), 413-427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.12.003
Laplume, A. O. & Dass, P. (2012). Exploration and exploitation for various stages of firm growth through diversification. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Academy of Management, Boston, August of 2012.
Lawrence, E.T., Tworoger, L., Ruppel, C.P. & Yurova, Y. (2021). TMT leadership ambidexterity: balancing exploration and exploitation behaviors for innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, (ahead of print), 1460-1060. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-07-2020-0275
Levinthal, D. (1997). Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Science, 43(7), 934-950. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.43.7.934
Levinthal, D. & March, J. (1993). Myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), 95-112. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141009
Li, C.-R., Lin, C.-J. & Tien, Y.-H. (2015). CEO transformational leadership and top manager ambidexterity: An empirical study in Taiwan SMEs. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 36(8), 927-954. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-03-2014-0054
Li, H., & Zhang, Y. (2002). Founding team comprehension and behavioral integration: Evidence from new technology ventures in China. Academy of Management, Best Paper Proceedings. https://journals.aom.org/doi/pdf/10.5465/apbpp.2002.7516611
Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y. & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32(5), 646-672. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306290712
Luo, B., Zheng, S., Ji, H. & Liang, L. (2018). Ambidextrous leadership and TMT-member ambidextrous behavior: the role of TMT behavioral integration and TMT risk propensity. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(2), 338-359. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1194871
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
Martin, A., Keller, A. & Fortwengel, J. (2019). Introducing conflict as the microfoundation of organizational ambidexterity. Strategic Organization, 17(1), 38-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127017740262
Mathias, B.D., Mckenny, A.F. & Crook, T.R. (2017). Managing the tensions between exploration and exploitation: The role of time. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(3), 316–334. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1287
Mihalache, O., Jansen, J., Van Den Bosch, F. & Volberda, H.W. (2014). Top Management Team Shared Leadership and Organizational Ambidexterity: a Moderated Mediation Framework. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 8(2), 128-148. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1168
Mom, T. J. M., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J. & Volberda, H. W. (2007). Investigating Managers’ Exploration and Exploitation Activities: The Influence of Top-Down, Bottom-Up, and Horizontal Knowledge Inflows. Journal of Management Studies, 44(6), 910-931. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00697.x
Mooney, A.C., & Sonnenfeld, J. (2001). Exploring antecedents to conflict during strategic decision making: The importance of behavioral integration. A paper presented in the Academy of Management Meeting, BPS Division. https://www.proquest.com/openview/2cae1eb369b111a4bed4164c9919260c/
Nelson, S., Brunetto, Y., Fan-Wharton, R., & Ramsay, S. (2007). Organisational effectiveness of Australian fast growing small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Management Decision, 45(7), 1143–1162. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740710773952
O’Reilly, C. A. & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, 82, 74-81. O’Reilly, C. A. & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity
as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002
O’Reilly, C. A. & Tushman, M. L. (2011). Organizational Ambidexterity in Action: How Managers Explore and Exploit. California Management Review, 53(4), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2011.53.4.5
O’Reilly, C.A. & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present, and Future. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324-338. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0025
Probst, G. & Raisch, S. (2005). Organizational crisis: The logic of failure. Academy of Management Executive, 19(1), 90-105. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2005.15841958
Raisch, S. (2008). Balanced structures: Designing organizations for profitable growth. Long Range Planning, 41(5), 483-508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2008.06.004
Raisch, S. & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators. Journal of Management, 34(3), 375-409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316058
Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G. &Tushman, M.L. (2009). Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance. Organization Science, 20(4), 685–695. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0428
Romanelli, E. & Tushman, M. L. (1994). Organizational Transformation as Punctuated Equilibrium: An Empirical Test. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1141-1166. https://doi.org/10.5465/256669
Rothaermel, F. T. & Deeds, D. L. (2004). Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal, 25(3), 201-221. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.376
Shah, S.F.H., Nazir, T., Zaman, K. & Shabir, M. (2013). Factors Affecting the Growth of Enterprises: A Survey of the Literature from the Perspective of Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Journal of Enterprise Transformation, 3(2), 53-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/19488289.2011.650282
Siggelkow, N. & Levinthal, D. A. (2003). Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organization Science, 14(6), 650-669. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.6.650.24840
Simsek, Z., Heavey, C., Veiga, J. F. & Souder, D. (2009). A Typology for Aligning Organizational Ambidexterity’s Conceptualizations, Antecedents, and Outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 864-894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00841.x
Sinha, S. (2019). The emergent-strategy process of initiating organizational ambidexterity. Journal of Strategy and Management, 12(3), 382-396. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-12-2018-0140
Smith, W. & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16(5), 522–536. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0134
Smith, W. K. & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381-403. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.59330958
Taródy, D. (2012). Formalizált rugalmasság – a kettős képesség kialakulása egy középvállalatban. Vezetéstudomány, 43(12), 49-60. http://unipub.lib.uni-corvinus.hu/1055/1/vt_2012n12p49.pdf
Taródy, D. (2016). Organizational ambidexterity as a new research paradigm in strategic management. Vezetéstudomány, 47(5), 39-52. https://doi.org/10.14267/veztud.2016.05.04
Tushman, M. L. & Anderson, P. (1986). Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(3), 439-465. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392832
Tushman, M. L. & O’Reilly, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8-30. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165852
Tushman, M. L. & Romanelli, E. (1985). Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 171-222.
Umans, T., Smith, E., Andersson, W. & Planken, W. (2020). Top management teams’ shared leadership and ambidexterity: the role of management control systems. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 86(3), 444-462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852318783539
Van Doorn, S., Tretbar, T., Reimer, M. & Heyden, M. (2020). Ambidexterity in family firms: The interplay between family influences within and beyond the executive suite. Long Range Planning, 101998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2020.101998.
Venugopal, A., Krishnan, T.N. & Kumar, M. (2018). Identifying the focal role of top management paradoxical cognition in ambidextrous firms. Management Decision, 56(1), 47-63. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2017-0402
Venugopal, A., Krishnan, T.N., Kumar, M. & Upadhyayula, R.S. (2019). Strengthening organizational ambidexterity with top management team mechanisms and processes. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(4), 586-617. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1277369
Wan, J., Le, Y., Wang, G., Xia, N. & Liu, X. (2020). Carrot or stick? The impact of paternalistic leadership on the behavioral integration of top management teams in megaprojects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 13(5), 937-960. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-12-2019-0302
Wang, S.L., Luo, Y., Maksimov, V., Sun, J. & Celly, N. (2019). Achieving temporal ambidexterity in new ventures. Journal of Management Studies, 56(4), 788-822. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12431
Wilms, R., Winnen, L.A. & Lanwehr, R. (2019). Top Managers’ cognition facilitates organisational ambidexterity: The mediating role of cognitive processes. European Management Journal, 37(5), 589-600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.03.006.
Yeo, Y. & Park, C. (2018). Managing Growing Pains for the Sustainable Growth of Organizations: Evidence from the Growth Pathways and Strategic Choices of Korean Firms. Sustainability, 10(10), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103824
Yohannes, T.H. & Ayako, A. B. (2016). Top management team demographic diversities, generic strategy and firm performance in marketing social research association (MSRA) in Kenya. Applied Finance and Accounting, 2(2), 30-45. https://doi.org/10.11114/afa.v2i2.1586
Downloads
Megjelent
Hogyan kell idézni
Folyóirat szám
Rovat
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Vezetéstudomány / Budapest Management Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors assign copyright to Vezetéstudomány / Budapest Management Review. Authors are responsible for permission to reproduce copyright material from other sources.
