A vállalatok hozzájárulása a fogyasztók ontológiai biztonságérzetéhez
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2022.08-09.07Keywords:
corporate security responsibility (CSecR), psychological security, consumers’ ontological security, consumers’ perceived securityAbstract
As a consequence of the ongoing discourse on the interpretation of the concept of security, the abstract interpretation of it, which is linked to national borders and narrowed down to national security, has fundamentally changed. Since the 1990s, as a counterpoint to the traditional state-oriented security policy approach, paradigms have emerged that emphasise the legitimacy of human and personal security, on the basis of which security can be defined as a subjective, individual perception. The psychological dimensions of security, comprising the components of ontological security, have come under scientific interest. The subsequent aim of this paper is to identify how consumers perceive the contribution of companies in accordance with their overall sense of security, what security-related tasks they expect from business actors, and how they relate to the performance of companies in this area, constructing an ontological model of consumers’ perception of security.
Downloads
References
Amundrud, Ø., Aven T., & Flage R. (2017). How the definition of security risk can be made compatible with safety definitions. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability. 231(3), 286-294. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748006X17699145
Angyal, Á. (2008). A felelős vállalat szindróma. Vezetéstudomány, 39(11), 23-30. https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2008.11.03
Baeva, I., & Bordovskaia, N. (2015). The psychological safety of the educational environment and the psychological well-being of Russian secondary school pupils and teachers. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 8, 86-99. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2015.0108
Blynova, O., Holovkova, L., & Sheviakov, O. (2018). Philosophical and sociocultural dimension of personality psychological security. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 14, 73-83. https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i14.150750
Boda, Zs., & Scheiring, G. (2010). A közszolgáltatások politikai értelmezéséről. Politikatudományi Szemle, 19(3), 45-64. http://real.mtak.hu/112163/1/boda.pdf
Brooks, D. (2010). What is security: Definition through knowledge categorization. Security Journal, 23, 225– 239. https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2008.18
Brown, S., & Leigh, T. (1996). A New Look at Psychological Climate and Its Relationship to Job Involvement. The Journal of Applied Psychology. 81, 358-368. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.4.358
Carroll, A., & Shabana, K. (2010). The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00275.x
Colobran, M. (2016). Modeling human perceived security: A conceptual framework and its application to health. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.050
Csépe, V. (2018). The psychological dimensions of subjective security. In Finszter, G. & Sajbanics, I. (Eds.), Security challanges in 21st century (pp. 279-292). Budapest, Pécs: Diaglóg Campus.
Dorssemont, F. (2004). Corporate social responsibility, what’s in a name? A critical appraisal of the Green Paper. Transfer, European Review of Labour and Research. Quarterly of the European Trade Union Institute, 10(3), 362-371. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F102425890401000304
Dusek, T. (2015). A lakókörnyezeti biztonságérzet településtípusok szerinti különbsége Magyarországon. Közép-Európai Közlemények, 8(3), 101-109. https://ojs.bibl.u-szeged.hu/index.php/vikekkek/article/view/12296
Edmondson, A. C., & Lei Z. (2014). Psychological Safety: The History, Renaissance, and Future of an Interpersonal Construct. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 23-43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091305
Elms, H., & Phillips, R. (2009). Private Security Companies and Institutional Legitimacy: Corporate and Stakeholder Responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(3), 403–432. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27673285
Engerer, H. (2009). Security Economics: Definition and Capacity. Economics of Security. Working Paper 5. Economics of Security, Berlin. https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.94891.de/diw_econsec0005.pdf
Európai Bizottság (2011). A bizottság közleménye az Európai Parlamentnek, a Tanácsnak, a Gazdasági és Szociális Bizottságnak és a Régiók Bizottságának. A vállalati társadalmi felelősségvállalásra vonatkozó megújult uniós stratégia (2011-2014). COM (2011) 681. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/HU/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52011DC0681&from=EN
European Commission (2001). Green Paper, Promoting a European framework for Corporate Social Responsibility. COM(2001) 366 final. Brussels. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/DOC_01_9
Etl, A., & Tálas, P. (2020). A magyar biztonságpercepció átalakulása 1999–2019 között. Nemzet és Biztonság– Biztonságpolitikai Szemle, 13(2), 94-112. https://doi.org/10.32576/nb.2020.2.7
Gazdag F., & Tálas P. (2008). A biztonság fogalmainak határairól. Nemzet és Biztonság, 1(1), 3-9. http://www.nemzetesbiztonsag.hu/cikkek/gazdag_ferenc__talas_peter-a_biztonsag_fogalmanak_hatarairol.pdf
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Harries, T. (2008). Feeling secure or being secure? Why it can seem better not to protect yourself against a natural hazard. Health Risk & Society, 10(5), 479-490. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570802381162
Hartono, E., Holsapple, C. W., Kim, K., Na, K. S., & Simpson, J. T. (2014). Measuring perceived security in B2C electronic commerce website usage: A respecification and validation. Decision Support Systems, 62, 11-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2014.02.006
Herath, T., & Rao, R. (2009). Protection motivation and deterrence: a framework for security policy compliance in organisations. European Journal of Information Systems, 18(2), 106-125. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2009.6
Hiscock, R., Kearns, A., Macintyre, S., & Ellaway, A. (2001). Ontological Security and Psycho-Social Benefits from the Home: Qualitative Evidence on Issues of Tenure. Housing, 18(1-2), 50-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036090120617
Jabareen, Y., Eizenberg, E., & Zilberman, O. (2017). Conceptualizing urban ontological security: ‘Being-inthe- city’ and its social and spatial dimensions. Cities, 68, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.05.003
Juhász, M., & Vasvári, F. (2022). A biztonságtudatos vezetői attitűd vizsgálata. Vezetéstudomány, 53(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2022.01.04
Kekovic, Z., & Markovic, S. (2009). Security as a factor of competitive advantage in tourism. Tourism and Hospitality Management, 15(2), 291-303. https://doi.org/10.20867/thm.15.2.12
Keller, K., & Tóth-Kaszás, N. (2021). A turizmusbiztonság megjelenése az EU tagállamainak turisztikai stratégiáiban. Vezetéstudomány, 52(6), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2021.06.03
Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause. Hoboken,NJ: John Wiley &Sons, Inc.
Központi Statisztikai Hivatal (2013). Biztonságérzet-kutatás. https://www.ksh.hu/docs/hun/xstadat/xstadat_eves/i_zaa013.html
Krahmann, E. (2018). The market for ontological security. European Security, 27(3), 356-373. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2018.1497983
Lentner, Cs. & Nagy, V. (2020). New dimensions of commercial banks’ corporate social responsibility in the Visegrád Group countries. Banks and Bank Systems, 15(2), 138-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.15(2).2020.13
Lindenberg, M. (2002). Measuring Household Livelihood Security at the Family and Community Level in the Developing World. World Development, 30(2), 301-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00105-X
Lippert, R., Walby, K., & Steckle, R. (2013). Multiplicities of corporate security: Identifying emerging types, trends and issues. Security Journal, 26, 206-221. https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2013.12
Mahrous, A. M., Moustafa, Y. M., & Abou El-Ela, M. M. (2018). Physical characteristics and perceived security in urban parks: Investigation in the Egyptian context. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 9(4), 3055-3066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2018.07.003
Málovics, Gy., Csigéné Nagypál, N., & Kraus, S. (2008). The role of corporate social responsibility in strong sustainability. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(3), 907-918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2006.12.061
Mantere, S. & Whittington, R. (2020). Becoming a strategist: The roles of strategy discourse and ontological security in managerial identity work. Strategic Organization, 19(4), 553-578. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127020908781
Mattar, M. (2006). Human Security or State Security? The Overriding Threat in Trafficking in Persons. Intercultural Human Rights Law Review, 1. 249- 279. https://www.stu.edu/Portals/law/docs/human-rights/ihrlr/volumes/1/249-279-MohamedYMattar-HumanSecurityorStateSecurity-TheOverridingThreatinTraffickinginPersons.pdf
Michelberger, P. (2014). Információbiztonság és üzleti bizalom [Habilitációs tézisfüzet]. Óbudai Egyetem Biztonságtudományi Doktori Iskola, Budapest. https://docplayer.hu/9875689-Habilitacios-tezisfuzet-dr-michelberger-pal-informaciobiztonsag-es-uzleti-bizalom.html
Mitev, A., & Sajtos, L. (2007). SPSS Kutatási és adatelemzési kézikönyv. Budapest: Alinea Kiadó.
Newman, E. (2010). Critical human security studies. Review of International Studies, 36(1), 77-94. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210509990519
Owen, T. (2008). Measuring Human Security. In Liotta P.H., Mouat D.A., Kepner W.G., & Lancaster, J.M. (Eds.), Environmental Change and Human Security: Recognizing and Acting on Hazard Impacts. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security (pp. 35-64). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8551-2_3
Pfleeger, S., & Cunningham, R. (2010). Why Measuring Security Is Hard. IEEE Security & Privacy, 8(4), 46- 54. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2010.60
PWC (2017). Consumer Intelligence Series: Protect.me An in-depth look at what consumers want, what worries them, and how companies can earn their trust – and their business. https://www.pwc.com/us/en/advisory-services/publications/consumer-intelligence-series/protect-me/cis-protect-me-findings.pdf
Radványi, L.(2009). A magyar lakosság biztonságfelfogása és értékpreferenciái, 1999–2008. Nemzet és Biztonság, 2(2), 9-22. http://www.nemzetesbiztonsag.hu/cikkek/radvanyi_lajos-a_magyar_lakossag_biztonsagfelfogasa_es_ertekpreferenciai__1999_2008.pdf
Raffay-Danyi, Á., & Hajmásy, G. (2021). A dolgozói elégedettség vizsgálata a belső CSR-tevékenységek tükrében. Vezetéstudomány, 52(4), 32–47. https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2021.04.04
Remišová, A., & Kirchmayer, Z. (2012). Measuring corporate social responsibility towards employees. Journal for East European Management Studies, 17(3), 273-291. https://doi.org/10.5771/0949-6181-2012-3-273
Rényi, A., Sík, D., S., & Takács, E. (2014). Elemzési szempontok a késő modern társadalmak kordiagnózisához. Szociológiai Szemle, 24(3), 18-60. https://szociologia.hu/dynamic/renyi_et_al.pdf
Rossdale, C. (2015). Enclosing critique: the limits of ontological security. International Political Sociology, 9(4), 369-386. https://doi.org/10.1111/ips.12103
Ruighaver, A., & Maynard, S. (2006). Organizational Security Culture: More Than Just an End-User Phenomenon. In Fischer-Hübner, S., Rannenberg, K., Yngström, L., & Lindskog, S. (Eds.), Security and Privacy in Dynamic Environments. SEC 2006. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, vol 201 (pp. 425-430). Boston, MA: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-33406-8_36
Saáry, R. & Csiszárik-Kocsir, Á. (2021). A biztonsághoz köthető vállalati felelősségvállalás vizsgálata. Polgári Szemle, 17(4–6), 182–200. https://doi.org/10.24307/psz.2021.1213
Sass, J. (2005). Bizalom a szervezetekben. Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle, 60(1-2), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1556/mpszle.60.2005.1-2.2
Scherer, A., & Palazzo, G. (2006). Toward a Political Conception of Corporate Responsibility: Business and Society Seen From a Habermasian Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096-1120. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.26585837
Seele, P., & Lock, I. (2014). Instrumental and/or Deliberative? A Typology of CSR Communication Tools. Journal of Business Ethics, 131, 401-414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2282-9
Shach-Pinsly, D. (2019). Measuring security in the built environment: Evaluating urban vulnerability in a human- scale urban form. Landscape and Urban Planning, 191, 103412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.022
Sik, D. (2013). Giddens modernizációelmélete: Intézményi átalakulás és politikai praxis. Replika, (82), 97- 112. http://real.mtak.hu/110321/1/replika82-05Sik.pdf
Singhal, H., & Kar, A. K. (2015). Information Security concerns in Digital Services: Literature review and a multi-stakeholder approach. In International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI) (pp. 901-906). Kochi: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACCI.2015.7275725
Tóth, P., & Horváth, H. (2004). A szubjektív biztonságérzetet befolyásoló tényezők Magyarországon. https://kgk.sze.hu/images/dokumentumok/kautzkiadvany2014/TothP_HorvathH.pdf
Ürmösi, K. (2015). A biztonság dimenziói, biztonsági stratégia napjainkban, hazánkban. Hadtudományi Szemle, 5(1-2), 172-184. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12944/1155
Vasvári, Gy., Lengyel, Cs., & Valádi, Z. (2006). Vállalati biztonság keretrendszere, Vagyonbiztonság, Üzembiztonság. Informatikai Biztonság Ajánlás 6.0 változat. Budapest: Budapesti Műszaki és Gazdaságtudományi Egyetem.
Wang, J., Long, R., Chen, H., & Li, Q. (2019). Measuring the Psychological Security of Urban Residents: Construction and Validation of a New Scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2423. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02423
Wolf, K. D., Deitelhoff, N., & Engert, S. (2007). Corporate Security Responsibility: Towards a Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Research Agenda. Cooperation and Conflict, 42(3), 294–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836707079934
Zotova, O., & Karapetyan, L. (2018). Psychological security as the foundation of personal psychological wellbeing (analytical review). Psychology of Russia: State of Art, 11, 100-113. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2018.0208
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Vezetéstudomány / Budapest Management Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors assign copyright to Vezetéstudomány / Budapest Management Review. Authors are responsible for permission to reproduce copyright material from other sources.
