Játék és játékosság a szervezetben
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2022.02.02Kulcsszavak:
komoly játék, játszma, szervezeti játék, pszichodinamikaAbsztrakt
Hagyományos logika szerint a játékot többnyire a szórakozással kapcsoljuk össze és nem keverjük a munkával. Ha mégis, akkor erőforrásként, a szervezeti célok szolgálatába állítható eszközként tekintünk rá. A játék azonban más perspektívából nyílt végű transzformációs folyamat, amely közel sem kontrollálható a végkifejlet és sokszor a kiindulási pont tekintetében sem. Éppen ezért fontos, hogy megismerjük, hogy a fogalomkörbe milyen rejtett, vagy kevéssé reflektált értelmezések tartoznak, hiszen ezek formálják a szervezetek mindennapjait. Jelen kutatás célja, a vállalati játék összetett jelenségének feltárása a nemzetközi szakirodalomban fellelhető releváns elméletek összegzése és újra-rendezése által. A tanulmány taglalja a fogalom definíciós kérdéseit, részletesen kifejti az egyes elméleti iskolákat, végül bemutatja a szervezeti kontextusú játék integrált modelljét.
Letöltések
Hivatkozások
Adams, J., Khan, H. T. A., Raeside, R., & White, D. (2007). Research methods for graduate business and social science students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Andersen, N. Å. (2009). Power at play: The relationships between play, work and governance. Cham: Springer.
Andersen, N. Å., & Pors, J. G. (2014). Playful membership: Embracing an unknown future. Management & Organizational History, 9(2), 166183. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449359.2014.891796
Barnett, L. A. (2007). The nature of playfulness in young adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 949–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.02.018
Barley, S. R., & Kunda, G. (1992). Design and devotion: surges of rational and normative ideologies of control in managerial discourse. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(3), 363–399. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393449
Bateson, P. (2010). Theories of play. In Peter Nathan & Anthony D. Pellegrini (Eds.), Oxford Handbooks Online. Oxford: OUP. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195393002.013.0004
Blatner, A. (2004). A pszichodráma alapjai, történet, elmélet, gyakorlat. Budapest: Animula.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Caillois, R. (1961). Man, play, and games. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
Carr, A. (2003). Organizational discourse as a creative space for play: the potential of postmodernist and surrealist forms of play. Human Resource Development International, 6(2), 197217. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678860110096220
Celestine, N. A., & Yeo, G. (2021). Having some fun with it: A theoretical review and typology of activity‐based play‐at‐work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(2), 252268. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2444
Chia, R., & MacKay, B. (2007). Postprocessual challenges for the emerging strategyaspractice perspective: Discovering strategy in the logic of practice. Human Relations, 60(1), 217242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726707075291
Cornelissen, J. P. (2004). What are we playing at? Theatre, organization, and the use of metaphor. Organization Studies, 25(5), 705726. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840604042411
Costea, B., Crump, N., & Holm, J. (2005). Dionysus at work? The ethos of play and the ethos of management. Culture and Organization, 11(2), 139151. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759550500091069
Deal, T. E., & Kennedy, A. A. (1982). Organization cultures: The rites and rituals of organization life. Reading, UK: AddisonWesley.
Deterding, S. (2018). Gamification in management: Between choice architecture and humanistic design. Journal of Management Inquiry, 28(2), 131136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492618790912
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness. In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference on Envisioning Future Media Environments – MindTrek ‚11 (pp. 915). New York: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040
Gadamer, H. (2003). Igazság és módszer. Budapest: Osiris Kiadó.
Gherardi, S. (2009). Practice? It’s a matter of taste! Management Learning, 40(5), 535550. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1350507609340812
Goffman, E. (1981). A hétköznapi élet szociálpszichológiája. Budapest: Gondolat Kiadó.
Guba, E.G. & Lincoln, Y.S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105117). London: Sage Publications, Inc.
Huizinga, J. (1944). Homo Ludens: A study of the play element in culture. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Mainemelis, C., & Ronson, S. (2006). Ideas are born in fields of play: Towards a theory of play and creativity in organizational settings. Research in Organizational Behavior, 27, 81131. https://doi.org/10.1016/s01913085(06)270035
Mangham, I. L., & M. A. Overington (1987). Organizations as theatre: A social psychology of dramatic appearances. Chichester: Wiley.
March, J. (2020[1971]). The technology of foolishness. In Shaping Entrepreneurship Research (pp. 120130). London: Routledge.
Mayer, I., Warmelink, H., & Zhou, Q. (2015). A framereflective discourse analysis of serious games. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(2), 342357. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12245
Miettinen, R., SamraFredericks, D., & Yanow, D. (2009). Return to practice: An introductory essay. Organization Studies, 30(12), 13091327. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0170840609349860
Nicolini, D. (2011). Practice as the site of knowing: Insights from the field of telemedicine. Organization Science, 22(3), 602620. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20868882
Petelczyc, C. A., Capezio, A., Wang, L., Restubog, S. L., & Aquino, K. (2017). Play at work: An integrative review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 44(1), 161190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317731519
Pors, J. G., & Andersen, N. Å. (2014). Playful organisations: Undecidability as a scarce resource. Culture and Organization, 21(4), 338354. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2014.924936
Proyer, R. T. (2012). Development and initial assessment of a short measure for adult playfulness: The SMAP. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(8), 989 994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.07.018
Proyer, R. T. (2011). Being playful and smart? The relations of adult playfulness with psychometric and selfestimated intelligence and academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(4), 463467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.02.003
Proyer, R. T. (2013). The wellbeing of playful adults: Adult playfulness, subjective wellbeing, physical wellbeing, and the pursuit of enjoyable activities. The European Journal of Humour Research, 1(1), 8498. http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh78008
Roy, D. (1959). „Banana time”: Job satisfaction and informal interaction. Human Organization, 18(4), 158168. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.18.4.07j88hr1p4074605
Salovaara, P., & Statler, M. (2018). Always already playing: Hermeneutics and the Gamification of existence. Journal of Management Inquiry, 28(2), 149152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492618792185
Sicart, M. (2018). Quixotean Play in the Age of Computation. American Journal of Play, 10(3). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1192054.pdf
Sørensen, B. M., & Spoelstra, S. (2011). Play at work: Continuation, intervention and usurpation. Organization, 19(1), 8197. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508411407369
Spraggon, M., & Bodolica, V. (2018). An integrative framework for understanding informal play as practice in organizational settings. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2018(1), 16202. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2018.16202abstract
Statler, M., Heracleous, L., & Jacobs, C. D. (2011). Serious play as a practice of paradox. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47(2), 236256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886311398453
Statler, M., Roos, J., & Victor, B. (2009). Ain’t Misbehavin’: Taking play seriously in organizations. Journal of Change Management, 9(1), 87107. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010902727252
Stenros, J. (2016). The game definition game. Games and Culture, 12(6), 499520. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412016655679
SuttonSmith, B. (2008). Play theory: A personal journal and new thoughts. American Journal of Play, 1, 80 123. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1068966.pdf
SuttonSmith, B. (2009). The ambiguity of play. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Thibault, M., Heljakka, K. (2018). Toyification. A Conceptual Statement. In 8th International Toy Research Association World Conference. Paris: International Toy Research Association (ITRA).
Tökkäri, V. (2015). Organizational play: Within and beyond managing. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 10(2), 86104. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM1120131181
Turner, V., & Turner, V. W. (1982). From ritual to theatre: The human seriousness of play. New York: Paj Publication.
Van Vleet, M., & Feeney, B. C. (2015). Play behavior and playfulness in adulthood. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9(11), 630643. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12205
Whittington, R. (2006). Completing the practice turn in strategy research. Organization studies, 27(5), 613 634. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0170840606064101
Winnicott, D. W. (1991). Playing and reality. New York: Psychology Press.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Ox- ford: Blackwell.
Yu, P., Wu, J. J., Chen, I. H., & Lin, Y. T. (2007). Is playfulness a benefit to work? Empirical evidence of professionals in Taiwan. International Journal of Technology Management, 39(34), 412429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2007.013503
Downloads
Megjelent
Hogyan kell idézni
Folyóirat szám
Rovat
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Vezetéstudomány / Budapest Management Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors assign copyright to Vezetéstudomány / Budapest Management Review. Authors are responsible for permission to reproduce copyright material from other sources.
