The Effective Use of RRI Teaching Methods on a CSR Course




RRI teaching, measuring effectiveness, responsibility, CSR, Q-methodology


Teaching with RRI methods makes a difference. This paper aims to evaluate the application of RRI tools in a CSR course. A course is considered effective when objectives, targeted skills, competences, and expected learning outcomes are communicated and reached. The focus of this research is understanding the impact of a specific international blocked course on the social and environmental sensitivity of students through the application of a mixed-method approach. Q-methodology was used to measure the preferences of students before and after the course regarding their individual behaviour and expectations towards companies. Interviews were conducted after the course to assess individual perceptions about the course and its teaching methods. Results suggest that the RRI approach in teaching is clearly appreciated by students, and its effectiveness is estimated as high. Changes in responsibility-related preference order reflect stronger and weaker impacts alike, helping identify effective RRI tools for teaching, as well as opportunities for further improvement.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Ágnes Zsóka, Corvinus University of Budapest

Full Professor

Katalin Ásványi, Corvinus University of Budapest

Associate Professor


Adler, S.P. (2002). Corporate scandals: It’s time for reflection in business schools. Academy of Management Perspectives, 16(3), 148-149.

Ásványi, K. (2014). A komolyzenére irányuló CSR vállalati megítélése: Vállalati attitűdvizsgálat Q-módszerrel. Marketing és Menedzsment, 48(1), 37-46.

Ásványi, K. & Kiss, D. (2019). A CSR kurzus hatása a hallgatók attitűdjére. Studia Mundi – Economica, 6(2), 3-14.

Bayram-Jacobs, D. (2015). Responsible Research and Innovation: What is it? How to Integrate in Science Education. In International Congress on Education for the Future: Issues and Challenges (ICEFIC 2015) Conference. Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.

Berg, B. L. & Lune, H. (2012). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Education Inc.

Blass, E. & Hayward, P. (2015). Developing globally responsible leaders: What role for business schools in the future? Futures, (66), 35–44.

Burguette, J. L.V., Lanero, A. & Licandro, O.D. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility and Higher Education: Uruguay University Students’ Perceptions. Economics and Sociology, 6(2), 145-157.

Chirieleison, C. (2017). CSR Education in Italian Economics Deparmtments: An Exploratory Study. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, (65), 12-29.

Christensen, L. J., Peirce, E. Hartman, L. P., Hoffman, W. M. & Carrier, J. (2007). Ethics, CSR, and sustainability education in the Financial Times Top 50 Global Business Schools: Baseline data and future research directions. Journal of Business Ethics, 73(4), 347–368.

Crane, A. & Matten, D. (2004). Questioning the Domain of the Business Ethics Curriculum. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(4), 357-369.

Davies, S., Edmister, J., Sullivan, K., & West, C. (2003). Educating sustainable societies for the twenty-first century. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 4(2), 169–179.

Doh, J.P. & Tashman, P. (2014). Half a world away: The integration and assimilation of corporate social responsibility, and sustainable development in business school curricula. Corporate Social Responsibiliy and Environmental Management, 21(3), 131-142.

Dudás, K. (2011). A tudatos fogyasztói magatartás dimenziói. Vezetéstudomány, 42(7–8), 47-55.

Evans, F.J. & Marcal, L.E. (2005). Educating for Ethics: Business Deans’ Perspectives. Business and Society Review, 110(3), 233-248.

Ficher, J. & Bonn, I. (2011). Business sustainability and undergraduate management education: An Australian study. Higher Education, 62(5), 563-571.

Gioia, D. (2002). Business education’s role in the crisis of corporate confidence. Academy of Management Executive, 16(3), 142-144.

Gore, C. (2015). The post-2015 moment: towards sustainable development goals and a new global development paradigm. Journal of International Development, 27(6), 717–732.

Hedberg, P.R. (2009). Learning Through Reflective Classroom Practice: Applications to Educate the Reflective Manager. Journal of Management Education, 33(10), 10-36.

Hofmeister-Tóth, Á. (2005). A Q-módszer és alkalmazása a marketingkutatásban. Műhelytanulmány. Budapest: Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem, Marketingkutatás és Fogyasztói Magatartás Tanszék.

Kagawa, F. (2007). Dissonance in students’ perception of sustainable development and sustainability: implications for curriculum change. International Journal for Sustainability in Higher Education, 8(3), 317–338.

Kassel, K. & Rimanoczy I. (2018). Developing a Sustainability Mindset in Management Education. London: Routledge.

King, N. (1994). The qualitative research interview. In Cassel, C. & Symon, G. (Eds.), Qualitative methods in organizational research – A practical guide (pp. 14-36). London: Sage Publications.

Klaassen, P., Kupper, F., Vermeulen, S., Rijnen, M., Popa, E., & Broerse, J. (2017). The Conceptualization of RRI: An Iterative Approach. In L. Asveld, R. van Dam-Mieras, T. Swierstra, S. Lavrijssen, K. Linse, & J. van den Hoven (Eds.), Responsible Innovation 3: A European Agenda? (pp. 69–92). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

Lourdel, N., Gondran, N., Laforest, V., Debray, B. & Brodhag, C. (2007). Sustainable development cognitive map: a new method of evaluating student understanding. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 8(2), 170–182.

Luthar, H. K. & Karri, R. (2005). Exposure to ethics education and the perception of linkage between organizational ethical behavior and business outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 61, 353–368.

Morris, A. (2009). The Stretched Academy: The Learning Experience of Mature Students from Under-represented Groups. In Bell, L., Neary, M. & Stevenson, H. (Eds.), The Future of Higher Education Policy, Pedagogy and the Student Experience (pp. 99-111). London: Continuum International Publishing Group.

Neary, M. & Thody, A. (2009). Learning Landscapes: Designing a Classroom of the Future. In Bell, L., Neary, M. & Stevenson, H. (Eds.), The Future of Higher Education Policy, Pedagogy and the Student Experience (pp. 30-41). London: Continuum International Publishing Group.

Nemcsicsné Zsóka Á. (2007). The role of organisational culture in the environmental awareness of companies. Journal for East European Management Studies, 12(2), 109-131.

Owen, R., Macnaghten, P. & Stilgoe, J. (2012). Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy, 39(6), 751-760.

Paschall, M. & Wüstenhagen, R. (2012). More Than a Game: Learning About Climate Change Through Role-Play. Journal of Management Education, 36(4), 510-543.

PQmethod 2.35 software (2019).

PQmethod Manual (2019).

Rieckmann, M. (2012). Future-oriented higher education: Which key competencies should be fostered through university teaching and learning? Futures, 44(2), 127-135.

Segon, M. & Booth, C. (2009). Business ethics and CSR as part of MBA curricula: An analysis of student preference. International Review of Business Research Papers, 5(3), 72-81.

Sleeper, B. J., Schneider, K. C., Weber, P. S. & Weber, J. E. (2006). Scale and study of student attitudes toward business education’s role in addressing social issues. Journal of Business Ethics, (68), 381–391.

Svanström, M., Lozano-Garzia, F.J. & Rowe, D. (2008). Learning outcomes for sustainable development in higher education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9(3), 339-351.

Tassone, V.C., O’Mahony, C., McKenna, E., Eppink, H.J. & Wals, A.E.J. (2018). (Re-)designing higher education curricula in times of systemic dysfunction: a responsible research and innovation perspective. Higher Education, 76(2), 337–352.

Teodoreanu, I. (2014). Sustainable business education – a Romanian perspective. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 706-711.

The Lund Declaration 2015 (2015).

Thomas, H. & Wilson, A. D. (2011). Physics envy, cognitive legitimacy or practical relevance: Dilemmas in evolution of management research in the UK. British Journal of Management, 22(3), 443–456.

von Schomberg, R. (2011). Prospects for Technology Assessment in a framework of responsible research and innovation. In Dusseldorp, P. & Beercroft, R. (Eds.), Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren (pp. 39-61). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

Watts, S. & Stenner, P. (2012). Doing Q methodological research theory, method and interpretation. London: Sage. Webler, T., Danielson, S., & Tuler, S. (2009). Using Q method to reveal social perspectives in environmental research. Greenfield, Mass.: Social and Environmental Research Institute.

Zsóka Á., Marjainé Szerényi Zs., Széchy A. & Kocsis T. (2013). Greening due to environmental education? Environmental knowledge, attitudes, consumer behavior and everyday pro-environmental activities of Hungarian high school and university students. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 126-138.

Zsóka Á., Marjainé Szerényi Zs., & Széchy A. (2011). A környezeti nevelés szerepe a fenntartható fogyasztás és életmód kialakításában. In Csutora M. & Hofmeister Tóth Á. (Eds.), Fenntartható fogyasztás? (pp. 90-109). Budapest: Aula Kiadó.

Zsóka, Á., Marjainé Szerényi, Zs., Ásványi, K. & Flachner, Zs. (2011). Combating the effects of extreme weather phenomena in small areas. In EMAN-EU 2011 Conference, Accounting for climate change – what and how to measure (pp. 147-155). 24-25. 01. 2011, Budapest: Proceedings.




How to Cite

Zsóka, Ágnes, & Ásványi, K. (2021). The Effective Use of RRI Teaching Methods on a CSR Course. Vezetéstudomány / Budapest Management Review, 51(7), 40–52.