Educating Future Business Leaders Through Values of Responsible Research and Innovation

Exploring the Potential of Sensitising Students in the Leading Business School of a Converging Economy




Higher education, RRI, Responsiveness, Sustainability, Ethics, Responsibility


The purpose of the research project was to explore the potential for applying the Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) approach in a leading business school. It was the authors’ intention to discern the key issues in how their business undergraduate students see their current and future roles as contributors to addressing major challenges in society. The authors’ findings revealed what students starting their university education already know about the societal issues addressed by the RRI initiative, and also in terms of where the greatest room for improvement exists for professors of business courses. The comparison of the results from action research between bachelor students and MBA students revealed preliminary indications of potential regional patterns (Central-Eastern Europe) to be further identified. The professional implications for business school faculty include encouragement to refine the business concept introduced to students so as to become more inclusive and responsive.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Miklós Kozma, Corvinus University of Budapest

Associate Professor


Almeida, M. S., & Quintanilha, A. (2017). Of responsible research – Exploring the science‐society dialogue in undergraduate training within the life sciences. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 45(1), 46-52.

Apotheker, J. (2019). The irresistible use of contexts in chemistry education. Israel Journal of Chemistry, 59(6-7), 608-617.

Balázs, J., & Gáspár, J. (2010). Taking care of each other: Solid economic base for living together. Futures, 42(1), 69-74.

Bela, G., Peltola, T., Young, J.C., Balázs, B., Arpin, I., Pataki, G., Hauck, J., Kelemen, E., Kopperoinen, L., Van Herzele, A., Keune, H., Hecker, S., Suškevičs, M., Roy, H.E., Itkonen, P., Külvik, M., László, M., Basnou, C., Pino, J., & Bonn, A. (2016). Learning and the transformative potential of citizen science. Conservation Biology, 30(5), 990-999.

Bourne, K., Wilkinson, C., Bancroft, M., Robinson, G., Noel, C., Varadi, A., Watson, M., Foster, M., & Lewis, D. (2018). UWE BoxED: Empowering students in the ‘real world’–providing responsible research and innovation opportunities through the BoxED project. Higher Education Pedagogies, 3(1), 451-462.

Cannon, C., & Buttell, F. (2015). Institutional review boards at very high research activity universities: An opportunity for social workers. Research on Social Work Practice, 25(7), 832-835.

Czakó, E. (1992). Lessons of the US business schools for Hungary: A comparison. Journal of Management Development. 11(3), 48-55.

Green, R. A. (2014). The Delphi technique in educational research. Sage Open, 4(2), 2158244014529773.

Harangozo, G., Csutora, M., & Kocsis, T. (2018). How big is big enough? Toward a sustainable future by examining alternatives to the conventional economic growth paradigm. Sustainable Development, 26(2), 172-181.

Heras, M., & Ruiz-Mallén, I. (2017). Responsible research and innovation indicators for science education assessment: how to measure the impact? International Journal of Science Education, 39(18), 2482-2507.

Hercegfi, K., Csillik, O., Bodnár, É., Sass, J., & Izsó, L. (2009). Designers of different cognitive styles editing e-learning materials studied by monitoring physiological and other data simultaneously. In Harris, D. (ed.), Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. EPCE 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5639 (pp. 179-186). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

Laherto, A., Kampschulte, L., de Vocht, M., Blonder, R., Akaygun, S., & Apotheker, J. (2018). Contextualizing the EU’s “Responsible Research and Innovation” policy in science education: A conceptual comparison with the nature of science concept and practical examples. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(6), 2287-2300.

Lehoux, P., Pacifico Silva, H., Pozelli Sabio, R., & Roncarolo, F. (2018). The unexplored contribution of responsible innovation in health to Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability, 10(11), 4015.

Kazai Ónodi, A. (2016). Teaching international business through role play activities. Journal of Management and Financial Sciences, 9(23), 77-91.

Klaassen, P., Kupper, F., Rijnen, M., Vermeulen, S., & Broerse, J. (2014). Policy brief on the state of the art on RRI and a working definition of RRI. RRI tools: fostering responsible research and innovation. Amsterdam: Athena Institute, VU University Amsterdam.

Monsonís-Payá, I., García-Melón, M., & Lozano, J. F. (2017). Indicators for responsible research and innovation: A methodological proposal for context-based weighting. Sustainability, 9(12), 2168.

Munakata, M., & Vaidya, A. (2013). Fostering creativity through personalized education. Primus, 23(9), 764-775.

Okada, A., Kowalski, R. P. G., Kirner, C., & Torres, P. L. (2019). Factors influencing teachers’ adoption of

AR inquiry games to foster skills for Responsible Research and Innovation. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(3), 324-335.

Okada, A., & Sherborne, T. (2018). Equipping the next generation for responsible research and innovation with open educational resources, open courses, open communities and open schooling: An impact case study in Brazil. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1(18), 1-15.

Ripley, E., Markowitz, M., Nichols-Casebolt, A., Williams, L., & Macrina, F. (2012). Guiding the next generation of NIH investigators in responsible conduct of research: The role of the mentor. Accountability in Research, 19(4), 209-219.

Sedlacek, S. (2013). The role of universities in fostering sustainable development at the regional level. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 74-84.

Toarniczky, A., Matolay, R., & Gáspár, J. (2019). Responsive higher education through transformational practices – The case of a Hungarian business school. Futures, 111, 181-193.

Toarniczky, A., & Szilas, R. F. (2015). The development of a new breed of generation Y leaders in Hungary. International Journal of Business Insights & Transformation, 9(1). 69-74.

de Vocht, M., Laherto, A., & Parchmann, I. (2017). Exploring teachers’ concerns about bringing Responsible Research and Innovation to European science classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(4), 326-346.

Waas, T., Verbruggen, A., & Wright, T. (2010). University research for sustainable development: definition and characteristics explored. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(7), 629-636.

Wimmer, Á., & Matolay, R. (2017). Stakeholder approach in business education and management practice – the case of Hungary. In Takács István (ed.), Proceedings – 11th International Conference on Mangement, Enterprise and Benchmarking (MEB 2017) (pp. 474-486). Budapest: Óbuda University, Keleti Faculty of Business and Management.

Wong, R. (2017). Evaluating a teaching module on ethically responsible evidence-based practice decision making in an advanced micro practice course. Journal of Social Work Education, 53(2), 240-259.

Zsolnai, L. (2006). Extended stakeholder theory. Society and Business Review. 1(1), 37-44.




How to Cite

Kozma, M. (2021). Educating Future Business Leaders Through Values of Responsible Research and Innovation: Exploring the Potential of Sensitising Students in the Leading Business School of a Converging Economy. Vezetéstudomány Budapest Management Review, 51(7), 65–75.




Most read articles by the same author(s)