A hatékony K+F modellek kidolgozása a felsőoktatásban
Kritériumok és strukturált megközelítések
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2024.11.05Kulcsszavak:
K+F modell, felsőoktatás, keretrendszer-fejlesztés, innovációs stratégia, intézményi versenyképességAbsztrakt
A tanulmány célja, hogy átfogó keretrendszert nyújtson a kutatás-fejlesztési (K+F) modellek elemzéséhez és fejlesztéséhez a felsőoktatásban. Annak ellenére, hogy a K+F menedzsmentgyakorlatok fejlődtek, továbbra sincsenek egyértelműen meghatározott modellek, amelyek biztosítják a hosszú távú rugalmasságot és a hatékony menedzsmentet a gyorsan változó környezetben. A rendelkezésre álló szakirodalomra támaszkodva ez a tanulmány olyan kritériumokat és strukturált megközelítéseket javasol, amelyek segítik a felsőoktatási intézményeket (HEI-k) a K+F tevékenységek irányításában és elősegítésében. A tanulmány olyan kulcsfontosságú dimenziókra összpontosít, mint a misszióval való összhang, a kutatási stratégia, az innovációs stratégia és a szellemi tőke menedzsmentje, célja pedig gyakorlati útmutatások nyújtása, amelyek növelhetik a HEI-k versenyképességét és társadalmi hatását. A cél az általános ajánlások túllépése és részletes kritériumlisták biztosítása a hatékony K+F modellek fejlesztésének irányítására.
Letöltések
Hivatkozások
Ankrah, S., & AL-Tabbaa, O. (2015). Universities–industry collaboration: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31(3), 387-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2015.02.003
Aziz, M., & Tran, H. (2022). Enhancing institutional competitiveness: The CERTi approach to assessing faculty research development efforts in higher education. Journal of Research Administration, 53(1), 122-143. https://www.srainternational.org/blogs/sraijra1/2022/03/10/enhancing-institutional-competitiveness-the-certi
Barnett, H.G. (1953). Innovation: the basis of cultural change. McGraw Hill
Bozeman, B., & Boardman, C. (2014). Research collaboration and team science: A state-of-the-art review and agenda. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06468-0
Bozeman, B., Fay, D., & Slade, C.P. (2013). Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: the-state-ofthe- art. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(1), 1-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9281-8
Bromham, L., Dinnage, R., & Hua, X. (2016). Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success. Nature, 534(7609), 684-687. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18315
Busch, L. (2023). Knowledge for sale: The neoliberal takeover of higher education. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scx046
Bushaway, R. (2003). Managing Research. McGraw-Hill Education.
Cantwell, B., & Kauppinen, I. (Eds.) (2014). Academic Capitalism in the Age of Globalization. JHU Press.
Carl, J., & Menter, M. (2021). The social impact of universities: assessing the effects of the three university missions on social engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 46(5), 965–976. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2021.1896803
Clark, B.R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: organizational pathways of transformation. Issues in Higher Education. International Association of Universities and Elsevier Science Ltd.
Compagnucci, L., & Spigarelli, F. (2020). The Third Mission of the university: A systematic literature review on potentials and constraints. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120284
Connell, H. (2005). University Research Management: Meeting the Institutional Challenge. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264017450-en
Conti, A., Thursby, J., & Thursby, M. (2013). Patents as signals for startup financing. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 61(3), 592-622. https://doi.org/10.1111/joie.12025
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
Franzoni, C., Scellato, G., & Stephan, P. (2012). Foreign- born scientists: mobility patterns for 16 countries. Nature Biotechnology, 30(12), 1250-1253. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2449
Geuna, A., & Muscio, A. (2009). The governance of university knowledge transfer: A critical review of the literature. Minerva, 47, 93-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-009-9118-2
Geuna, A., & Nesta, L.J. (2006). University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence. Research Policy, 35(6), 790-807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.005
Grimaldi, M., Cricelli, L., Di Giovanni, M., & Rogo, F. (2015). The patent portfolio value analysis: A new framework to leverage patent information for strategic technology planning. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 94, 286-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.10.013
Grimaldi, M., Greco, M., & Cricelli, L. (2021). A framework of intellectual property protection strategies and open innovation. Journal of Business Research, 123, 156-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.043
Gulamov, A.A., Ozatbekov, Y.F. & Ozatbekova, O.N. (2022). Innovation-oriented way of development of a modern university. Journal of New Century Innovations, 15(3), 53-59.
Gunnarsson, M. (2012). Research strategies at universities. A brief survey of research strategies at institutional and departmental level. University of Gothenburg. http://hdl.handle.net/2077/32437
Hayter, C.S., Lubynsky, R., & Maroulis, S. (2017). Who is the academic entrepreneur? The role of graduate students in the development of university spinoffs. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 1237-1254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9470-y
Hazelkorn, E., & Herlitschka, S. (2010). Research strategy and management in universities. Higher education management and development. In J. Huisman & A. Pausits (Eds.), Higher Education Management and Development. Compendium for Managers (pp.131-146).Waxman Verlag GmbH. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271505496_Research_Strategy_and_Management_in_Universities
Hicks, D. (2012). Performance-based university research funding systems. Research Policy, 41(2), 251-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007
Holgersson, M., & van Santen, S. (2018). The business of intellectual property: a literature review of IP management research. Stockholm Intellectual Property Law Review, 1(1), 44-63. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3202847
Hottenrott, H., & Lawson, C. (2017). Fishing for complementarities: Research grants and research productivity. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 51, 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2016.12.004
Jackson, D.J. (2011). What is an innovation ecosystem? National Science Foundation.
Jalaliyoon, N., & Taherdoost, H. (2012). Performance evaluation of higher education; a necessity. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 46(1983), 5682- 5686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.497
Khan, P.A., Johl, S.K., Akhtar, S., Asif, M., Salameh, A.A., & Kanesan, T. (2022). Open innovation of institutional investors and higher education system in creating open approach for SDG-4 quality education: a conceptual review. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010049
Knight, H.J. (2013). Patent strategy: For researchers and research managers. John Wiley & Sons.
Krishnaveni, D.R., & Meenakumari, J. (2010). Usage of ICT for information administration in higher education institutions – a study. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 1(3), 282- 286. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijesd.2010.v1.55
Łącka, I., & Brzezicki, Ł. (2020). Efficiency of the research and development activities of technical universities in Poland. Nierówności Społeczne Społeczne aA Wzrost Wzrost GospodarczyGospodarczy, 63(3), 258-274. https://doi.org/10.15584/nsawg.2020.3.13
Laudel, G., & Gläser, J. (2014). Beyond breakthrough research: Epistemic properties of research and their consequences for research funding. Research Policy, 43(7), 1204-1216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.02.006
Lemley, M.A. (2015). Faith-based intellectual property. UCLA Law Review, 62, 1328. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2587297
Mars, M.M., & Burd, R. (2013). Impact over revenue: Toward a social entrepreneurship model for university technology transfer. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Organization Management, 2(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.4172/2169-026X.1000104
McDonnell-Naughton, M., & Păunescu, C. (2022). Facets of social innovation in higher education. In Păunescu, C., Lepik, K.L., Spencer, N. (Eds.), Social Innovation in Higher Education (pp. 9-35). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84044-0_2
Mico University. (2019). Institutional Research Policy. https://themico.edu.jm/policies
Mittelmeier, J., & Yang, Y. (2022). The role of internationalisation in 40 years of higher education research: major themes from Higher Education Research & Development (1982–2020). Higher Education Research & Development, 41(1), 75-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.2002272
Mohamed Hashim, M.A., Tlemsani, I., & Matthews, R. (2022). Higher education strategy in digital transformation. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 3171-3195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10739-1
Namara, R.B., Komakech, R.A., Rwemisisi, J.T., Namubiru, P.S., Alinda, F., & Barifaijo, M.K. (2023). Management of research in a post-graduate institute: quality assurance systems. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 49(4), 240-251. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2023/v49i41204
OECD. (1963). Proposed standard practice for surveys on research and experimental development, The ‘Frascati Manual’. OECD. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org
OECD. (1980). The measurement of scientific and technological activities ‘Frascati Manual’ manual’ 1980. OECD. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org
OECD. (1992). Oslo Manual: Proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data. OECD. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org
OECD. (1993). Frascati Manual 1993: Proposed standard practice for surveys on research and experimental development. OECD. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org
OECD. (2002). Frascati Manual: The measurement of scientific and technological activities. OECD. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org
OECD. (2005). Oslo Manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. OECD. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org
OECD. (2005). University Research Management: Developing Research in New Institutions. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264006966-en
OECD. (2015). Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for collecting and reporting data on research and experimental development. OECD. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org
OECD. (2018). Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation. OECD. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org
Perkmann, M., Salandra, R., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., & Hughes, A. (2021). Academic engagement: A review of the literature 2011-2019. Research Policy, 50(1), 104114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104114
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., & Krabel, S. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423-442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007
Pinto, J.K., & Slevin, D.P. (1989). Critical success factors in R&D projects. Research Technology Management, 32(1), 31–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.1989.11670572
Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., Britten, N., Roen, K., & Duffy, S. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. A product from the ESRC methods programme. Version 1. Lancaster University. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1018.4643
Qin, X., & Du, D. (2018). Measuring universities’ R&D performance in China’s provinces: a multistage efficiency and effectiveness perspective. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 30(12), 1392-1408. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2018.1473849
Radović, S., Hummel, H.G., & Vermeulen, M. (2023). The mARC instructional design model for more experiential learning in higher education: theoretical foundations and practical guidelines. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(6), 1173-1190. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1872527
Rana, S., Verma, S., Haque, M.M., & Ahmed, G. (2022). Conceptualizing international positioning strategies for Indian higher education institutions. Review of International Business and Strategy, 32(4), 503-519. https://doi.org/10.1108/RIBS-07-2021-0105
Rasli, A., Tee, M., Lai, Y.L., Tiu, Z.C., & Soon, E.H. (2022), October. Post-COVID-19 strategies for higher education institutions in dealing with unknown and uncertainties. Frontiers in Education, (7), 992063). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.992063
Ravi, R., & Janodia, M.D. (2022). Factors affecting technology transfer and commercialization of university research in India: A cross-sectional study. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(1), 787-803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00747-4
Rooksby, J.H. (2020). Understand IP considerations regarding online instruction. Campus Legal Advisor, 20(12). https://doi.org/10.1002/cala.40295
Schumpeter, J.A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Harvard University Press.
Siegel, D.S., & Wright, M. (2015). Academic entrepreneurship: time for a rethink? British Journal of Management, 26(4), 582-595. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12116
Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D.A., Atwater, L.E., & Link, A.N. (2004). Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21(1-2), 115-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2003.12.006
Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D., & Link, A. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study. Research Policy, 32(1), 27-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00196-2
Solievich, T.N. (2022). Specific aspects of improving the quality of education in higher education institutions. ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 12(9), 31-34. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-7137.2022.00759.5
Soranzo, B., Nosella, A., & Filippini, R. (2017). Redesigning patent management process: an action research study. Management Decision, 55(6), 1100-1121. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2016-0226
Stolze, A., & Sailer, K. (2022). Advancing HEIs’ third-mission through dynamic capabilities: The role of leadership and agreement on vision and goals. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 47(2), 580-604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09850-9
Tahmooresnejad, L., & Beaudry, C. (2018). Do patents of academic funded researchers enjoy a longer life? A study of patent renewal decisions. Plos One, 13(8), p.e0202643. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202643
Teixeira, A.A., & Ferreira, C. (2019). Intellectual property rights and the competitiveness of academic spin-offs. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4(3), 154-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2018.12.002
Thompson, V.A. (1965). Bureaucracy and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 10(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391646
Tien, N.H., Ngoc, N.M., Trang, T.T.T., & Mai, N.P. (2022). Sustainable development of higher education institutions in developing countries: Comparative Analysis analysis of Poland and Vietnam. Contemporary Economics, 16(2), 195-210. https://doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.477
Tijssen, R. (2011). Joint research publications: a performance indicator of university-industry collaboration. Evaluation in Higher Education, 5(2), 19-40. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263919226_Joint_research_publications_A_performance_indicator_of_university-industry_collaboration#fullTextFile-Content
Trommetter, M. (2008). Intellectual property rights in agricultural and agro-food biotechnologies to 2030. OECD International Futures Project. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/23984578_Intellectual_property_rights_in_agricultural_and_agro-food_biotechnologies_to_2030_C_OECD_International_Futures_Programme
Tumwebaze Alicon, A. (2022). Higher education research, development agendas in Africa. Where is the convergence? A literature review. On the Horizon, 30(4), 182–189. https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-04-2022-0021
Van de Ven, A.H. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32(5), 590-607. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.590
Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Wagner, C.S., Whetsell, T.A., & Mukherjee, S. (2019). International research collaboration: Novelty, conventionality, and atypicality in knowledge recombination. Research Policy, 48(5), 1260-1270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.002
Zomer, A., & Benneworth, P. (2011). The rise of the university’s third mission. In Reform of Higher Education in Europe (pp. 81-101). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-555-0_6
Downloads
Megjelent
Hogyan kell idézni
Folyóirat szám
Rovat
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Corvinus University of Budapest, publisher of Vezetéstudomány / Budapest Management Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors assign copyright to Vezetéstudomány / Budapest Management Review. Authors are responsible for permission to reproduce copyright material from other sources.
