A biztonságtudatos vezetői attitűd vizsgálata
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2022.01.04Keywords:
safety culture, Bradley curve, safety awareness, transformational leadership, safety-awareness leadership style, safety-specific transformational leadership styleAbstract
A safety culture is part of the organizational culture that defines the safety attitudes and behaviours of employees. The level of a safety culture is influenced by the role and commitment of the leader. Vernon Bradley’s tool, the Bradley Curve, shows where the safety culture and the attitude of the leader’s safety awareness in the organization are going. Four levels can be distinguished: The first, reactive stage can be equated with passive leadership. Managers in the second, dependent stage apply a strongly control-based, rule-following driving style in their workplace. In the third stage, safety is based on the emergence of individual-focused leadership. In the fourth stage of interdependence, managers prefer teamwork-based leadership in terms of safety awareness. In this study, the authors interviewed thirty-five managers of a high-risk organization, then used content analysis to determine how each manager feels about their own, subordinates’ and the overall organization’s security awareness.
Downloads
References
Avolio, B.J., Bass, B.M., & Jung, D.I. (1999). Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 72(4), 441-462. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317999166789
Barling, J., Loughlin, C., & Kelloway, K. E. (2002). Development and Test of a Model Linking Safety-Specific Transformational Leadership and Occupational Safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 488–496. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.488
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
Bass, B.M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: learning to share the vision. Organisational Dynamics, 18(3), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(90)90061-S
Bass, B.M., & Avolio, B.J. (1990). Transformational leadership development: Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.
Beveren, P., Dimas, I. D., Lourenco ̧ P. R., & Rebelo, T. (2017). Psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the Global Transformational Leadership (GTL) scale. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 33(2), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpto.2017.02.004
Çalış, C., Büyükakıncı, B. Y. (2019). Leadership Approach in Occupational Safety: Taiwan Sample. Procedia Computer Science, 158, 1052–1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.146
Clarke, S. (2013). Safety leadership: a meta-analytic review of transformational and transactional leadership styles as antecedents of safety behaviours. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 86(1), 22–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.2012.02064.x
Fekete, H., & Dimény, E. (2012). Megfelelő kultúra = kiváló teljesítmény? Vezetéstudomány, 43(4), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.14267/veztud.2012.04.04
Fenyvesi, Cs. (2016). A biztonsági kultúra megjelenése egy nukleáris erőmű mindennapjaiban. Gradus, 3(1), 23-37. https://gradus.kefo.hu/archive/2016-1/2016_1_ENG_002_Fenyvesi.pdf
Flin, R., & Yule, S. (2004). Leadership for safety: industrial experience. Qual Saf Health Care, 13(2), 45-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2003.009555
Fichtinger, Gy. (2015). A biztonsági kultúra felmérése és az eredmények hasznosítása nukleáris létesítményeknél. Budapest: Országos Atomenergetika Hivatal.
Israni, C. (2015). Correlation of Safety Leadership and Safety Culture. Mary Kay O’Connor Process Safety Center. 17th Annual International Symposium, College Station, TX.
Izsó, L., & Antalovits, M. (2006). Emberi tényezők az atomerőműben (Belső tanulmány). Paks– Budapest.
Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek, M., Szwedzka, K., & Szczuka, M. (2015). Behaviour based intervention for occupational safety – case study. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 4876 – 4883. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.615
Kegan, R. (1980). Making meaning: The constructive-developmental approach to persons and practice. The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 58(5), 373-380. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2164-4918.1980.tb00416.x
Kegan, R. (1982). The evolving self: Problem and process in human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kegan, R. (1994). In Over Our Heads: The Mental Demands of Modern Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kegan, R., & Lahey, L. (1984). Adult leadership and adult development: A constructivist view. In B. Kellerman (Ed.), Leadership: Multidisciplinary Perspectives (pp. 199-229). New York: Prentice-Hall.
Kegan, R., & Lahey, L. (2009). Immunity to change: How to overcome it and unlock the potential in yourself and your organization. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Kertai-Kiss, I. (2016). A kockázat- és bizonytalanságkezelés kérdései és a biztonsági kultúra. TAYLOR, 8(1), 151-59. https://ojs.bibl.u-szeged.hu/index.php/taylor/article/view/12994
Kelman, H. C. (1997). A szociális befolyásolás három folyamata. In Lengyel Zsuzsanna (Ed.), Szociálpszichológia. Szöveggyűjtemény (pp. 225-233). Budapest: Osiris Kiadó.
Knippenberg, D., Knippenberg, B. Cremer, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2004). Leadership, self, and identity: A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 825–856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.002
Landy, F. J., & Conte, J. M. (2010). Work in the 21st Century: An Introduction to Industrial and Organisational Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Lazányi, K. (2016). A biztonsági kultúra szerepe a vezetői döntések támogatásában. TAYLOR, 8(1), 143-50. https://ojs.bibl.u-szeged.hu/index.php/taylor/article/view/12993
Li, L., & Hovsepian, J.H. (2020). Safety culture development model. Professional Safety, 65(2), 53-54. https://doi.org/10.2118/201259-MS
Lord, R.G., Diefendorff, J.M., Schmidt, A.M., & Hall, R.J. (2010). Self-regulation at work. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 543–568. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100314
Mullen, J. E., & Kelloway, K. E. (2009). Safety leadership: A longitudinal study of the effects of transformational leadership on safety outcomes. Journal of Occupation- al and Organizational Psychology, 82(2), 253–272. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317908X325313
Mullen, J. E., Kelloway, K. E., & Teed, M. (2011). Inconsistent style of leadership as a predictor of safety behaviour. Work & Stress, 25(1), 41-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2011.569200
Neal, A., & Griffin, M. A. (2002). Safety Climate and Safety Behaviour. Australian Journal of Management, 27(1 Suppl), 67-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/031289620202701S08
Neal, A., & Griffin, M. A. (2006). A Study of the Lagged Relationships Among Safety Climate, Safety Motivation, Safety Behavior, and Accidents at the Individual and Group Levels. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 946–953. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.946
Répáczki, R. (2014). A szakmai és a vezetői identitás alakulása fiatal felnőttkorban. A vezetői identitás alakulása a mentális komplexitás és a személyiség tükrében fiatal felnőtteknél (Doktori értekezés). Budapest: ELTE PPK.
Rudnák, I. (2010). A multikulturális környezet kihívásai a magyarországi nagyvállalatok vezetői körében (Doktori értekezés). Gödöllő: Szent István Egyetem Gazdálkodás- és Szervezéstudományi Doktori Iskola.
Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey–Bass.
Skeepersa, N. C., & Mbohwa, C. (2015). A study on the leadership behaviour, safety leadership and safety performance in the construction industry in South Africa. Procedia Manufacturing, 4, 10-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.11.008
Szanyi-Gyenes, X., & Almási, A. (2021). A vezető szerepe a kis- és közepes vállalkozások sikerességében. Vezetéstudomány, 52(3), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2021.03.04
Yukl, G. (1989). Managerial leadership: A review of theory and research. Journal of Management, 15(2), 251–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638901500207
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Vezetéstudomány / Budapest Management Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors assign copyright to Vezetéstudomány / Budapest Management Review. Authors are responsible for permission to reproduce copyright material from other sources.
