Women’s scarcity in academic governance

Gendered identity or gendered processes?





gendered practices, prejudice, career/occupational segregation


This article contributes to the empirical evidence for women’s scarcity in academic governance. The study evaluates to what extend women lean towards non-management careers and dismiss opportunities to attain executive roles in Colombian public universities, as well as the support received when they break the paradigm. The purpose was to determine whether gendered practices are ingrained in the designation process or whether women’s scarcity is the outcome of individual attributes/choices and collective perceptions of inadequacy. Data was collected from universities’ proceedings, opinion polls of rectors’ designations, and candidates’ curricula. Findings show low female candidacy rate but high public support for female candidates to the rector’s seat among all universities examined. Also, curricula’s in-depth analyses display women’s preference for male-dominated careers and analogous academic/administrative experience to that of male candidates. Hence, the results challenge explanations presented by human capital and congruity prejudice theories, while leaning towards gendered processes and identities.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Iris Laudith Solano Cahuana, Corvinus University of Budapest

PhD candidate


Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies Jobs Bodies: a theory of gendered organizations. Gender and Society, 4(2), 139– 158. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003071709-29

Acker, J. (1992). From Sex Roles to Gendered Institutions. Contemporary Sociology, 21(5), 565-569. https://doi.org/10.2307/2075528

Arango, L. G., Viveros M., & Bernal, R. (1995). Mujeres ejecutivas: Dilemas comunes, alternativas individuales. Bogotá: Ecoe Ediciones.

Arenas, F. (2019, October). Anulan elección de rectora de la Universidad Surcolombiana de Neiva. El Tiempo. https://www.eltiempo.com/colombia/otras-ciudades/ eleccion-de-rectora-en-la-universidad-surcolombia-na-es-anulada-423676

Avelar, S., & Zabludovsky, G. (1996). Women’s leadership and glass ceiling barriers in Brazil and Mexico. In Women’s leadership in a changing world (pp. 13-41). New York: UNIFEM.

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice Hall.

Berry, J. W (1983). Acculturation: A comparative analysis of alternative forms. In R. J. Samuda & A. L. Woods (Eds.), Perspectives in immigrant and minority education (pp. 66-77). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

Becker, G. S. (1993). Human Capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226041223.001.0001

Bosak, J., & Sczesny, S. (2011). Gender bias in leader selection? Evidence from a hiring simulation study. Sex Roles, 65(August). 234-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0012-7

Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Calás, M. B., Smircich, L., & Holvino, E. (2014). Theorizing gender and organization: Changing times... changing theories? In S. Kumra, R. Simpson, & R. J. Burke (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of gender in organizations (pp. 17-52). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199658213.013.025

Cardenas, M. C., Eagly, A., Salgado, E., Goode, W., Heller, L. I., Jaúregui, K., Galrza Quirós. N., ... Tunqui, R. C. (2013). Latin American female business executives: An interesting surprise. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 29(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-06-2013-0067

Chen, J., & Houser, D. (2019). When are women willing to lead? The effect of team gender composition and gendered tasks. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(6), 101340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101340

Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007a). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Boston, MA.: Harvard Business School Press. https://doi.org/10.1108/gm.2009.05324aae.001

Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007b). Women and the labyrinth of leadership. Harvard Business Review, 85(9), 62-71. https://doi.org/10.1037/e664062007-001

Eagly A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573-598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.109.3.573

England, P. (1982). The failure of human capital theory to explain occupational sex segregation. The Journal of Human Resources, 17(3), 258-370. https://doi.org/10.2307/145585

Fagenson, E. A. (1990). At the heart of women in management research: Theoretical and methodological approaches and their biases Journal of Business Ethics, 9(4), 267–274. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF00380326

Gaete-Quezada, R. (2018). Acceso de las mujeres a los cargos directivos: Universidades con techo de cristal. Revista CS, (24), 67-90. https://doi.org/10.18046/recs.i24.2431.

Goertz, J. P., & LeCompte, M. D. (1984). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Greenhaus, J. H., & Parasuraman, S. (1999). Research on work, family and gender: Current status and future directions. In G. N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of Gender and Work (pp. 391-412). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452231365

Guía Académica (2019, January). Solo cuatro mujeres son rectoras en universidades colombianas. El Tiempo. https://www.eltiempo.com/vida/educacion/por-que-hay-pocas-mujeres-rectores-de-universidades-en-colombia-312790

Korabik, K. (1999). Sex and gender in the new millennium. In G. N. Powel (Ed.), Handbook of Gender and Work (pp. 3-16). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452231365.n1

Ley No. 30. 1992 (Issued by the Colombian National Government on 30 December 1992), Santafé de Bogotá, Colombia. https://www.cna.gov.co/1741/articles-186370_ley _3092.pdf

Maxfield, S. (2008). Mejores prácticas para el progreso de las mujeres en las corporaciones de América Latina. In S. Maxfield, M. C. Cardenas, & L. Heller (Eds.), Mujeres y vida corporativa en Latinoamérica: Retos y dilemas (pp. 222-234). Bogotá, D.C.: Ediciones Uniandes.

Maxfield, S., Cardenas, M. C., & Heller, L. (2008). Mujeres y vida corporativa en Latinoamérica: Retos y dilemas. Bogotá, D.C.: Ediciones Uniandes.

Morgenroth, T., Ryan, M. K., & Peters, K. (2015, November 23). The Motivational Theory of Role Modeling: How Role Models Influence Role Aspirants’ Goals. Review of General Psychology, 19(4), 465-483. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000059

Ogliastri, E. (1998). Culture and organizational leadership in Colombia. Bogota: Universidad de los Andes. PNUD (2000). Informe sobre Desarrollo humano 2000. Nueva York: Tercer Mundo Editores. https://cotai.org.mx/descargas/infdeshumano2000.pdf

Polachek, S. (1975). Discontinuous Labor Force Participation and Its Effects on Women’s Market Earnings. In C. Lloyd (Ed.), Sex, Discrimination, and the Division of Labor (pp. 90-122). New York: Columbia University Press.

Polachek, S. (1976). Occupational Segregation: An Alternative Hypothesis. Journal of Contemporary Business, 5(Winter), 1-12.

Polachek, S. (1979). Occupational Segregation Among Women: Theory, Evidence, and a Prognosis. In C. Lloyd, E. Andrews, and C. Gilroy (Eds.), Women in the Labor Market (pp 137-157). New York: Columbia University Press.

Powell, G. N. (1993). Women and men in management (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Shih, M. J., Pittinsky, T. L., & Ho, G. C. (2011). Stereotype boost: Positive outcomes from the activation of positive stereotypes. In M. Inzlicht, & T. Schmader (Eds.), Stereotype threat: Theory, process, and application (pp. 141-156). Oxford: Oxford University Press.https://doi. org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199732449.003.0009.

SNIES (2020). Consulta de Instituciones. Sistema Nacional de Información para la Educación superior en Colombia. Retrieved from https://hecaa.mineducacion.gov.co/consultaspublicas/ies

Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797–811. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797.

UNESCO-IESALC (2020, March 7) ¿Dónde están las rectoras universitarias en américa latina? Retrieved from https://www.iesalc.unesco.org/2020/03/07/ donde-estan-las-rectoras-universitarias-enamerica-latina-datos-de-unesco-iesalc-develan-que-solo-el-18-de-las-universidadesde-la-region-tiene-a-mujeres-como-rectoras/

Valenzuela, M. & Reinecke, G. (Eds.) (2000). La calidad del empleo de las mujeres en los países del cono Sur, Mas y mejores empleos para las mujeres. Geneva: International Labor Organization. http://ilo.org/wcmsp5/ groups/public/---americas/---ro-lima/---sro-santiago/ documents/publication/wcms_201292.pdf

World Economic Forum (2020). Global Gender Gap Report. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_ 2020.pdf/




How to Cite

Solano Cahuana, I. L. (2021). Women’s scarcity in academic governance: Gendered identity or gendered processes?. Vezetéstudomány Budapest Management Review, 52(5), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2021.05.03



Studies and Articles