Hidden preferences in social responsibility

The analysis of Erste SEEDS corporate social responsibility programme

Authors

  • Fanni Tóth Corvinus University of Budapest

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2021.05.02

Keywords:

CSR, logit model, social entrepreneurship, content analysis

Abstract

Banks are usually active in creating and operating corporate social responsibility (CSR) programmes for different reasons. This paper analyses the Erste Bank SEEDS programme, which is dedicated to entrepreneurs promoting social welfare in Hungary. A total number of 68 social entrepreneurs were selected from 203 applicants to participate in the programme. To detect the success factors, the paper examines all proposals with content analysis. Then, using a bivariate logistic regression, the research estimates the probability of getting selected and identifies three critical factors: the potential social impact, financial sustainability and the life cycle of the product or service. These results hint to the bank caring about social impacts but only if financial sustainability is assured. Some social activities (community building, health or sustainable lifestyle) are less preferred than others (employment). The main contribution of the study is to present how corporate social responsibility programmes can be analysed and what hidden requirements may be incorporated within them.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Fanni Tóth, Corvinus University of Budapest

PhD student

References

Erste Bank Hungary Ltd. (2017a, September 29.). Development status. [PowerPoint slides].

Erste Bank Hungary Ltd. (2017b). Összes beérkezett és bírált pályázó. [Data file and code book].

Erste Bank Hungary Ltd. (2018, June 8). Záró ünnepség, Erste SEEDS program. [PowerPoint slides].

Erste SEEDS. (2020). Erste SEEDS Program. Retrieved from https://kampany.erstebank.hu/extras/ersteseeds/index.html

European Commission (2012). Comparative study of the project selection applied in cohesion policy programmes 2007-2013 in a number of member states. Final report. European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/studies/pdf/selection/selection_process.pdf

European Commission (2015). Proposals submission and evaluation (sections III.5, III.6, IV.1, IV.2). Grants manual. Version 1.4. European Commission, Directorate General for Research & Innovation. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/pse/h2020-guide-pse_en.pdf

Gangi, F., Meles, A., D’Angelo, E., & Daniele, L. M. (2019). Sustainable development and corporate governance in the financial system: Are environmentally friendly banks less risky? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(3), 529–547. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1699

Hámori, G. (2016). A magyarázóváltozók kezelésének egyes kérdései regressziós modellezés során. Statisztikai Szemle, 94(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.20311/stat2016.01.hu0005

Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied Logistic Regression: Hosmer/Applied Logistic Regression. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471722146

Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

Interreg IPA (2019). Evaluation of the efficiency and effectiveness of the Interreg IPA CBC Programme Croatia - Serbia 2014 – 2020, Final evaluation report. Retrieved from https://www.interreg-croatia-serbia2014-2020.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Evaluation-report_HR-RS.pdf

Liang, L.-W., Chang, H.-Y., & Shao, H.-L. (2018). Does sustainability make banks more cost efficient? Global Finance Journal, 38, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2018.04.005

Miralles‐Quirós, M. M., Miralles‐Quirós, J. L., & Redondo‐Hernández, J. (2019). The impact of environmental, social, and governance performance on stock prices: Evidence from the banking industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, csr.1759. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1759

IFKA NKft. (2020, January 24). Társadalmi vállalkozások monitoring/minősítő rendszere. [PowerPoint slides].

Weber, R. (1990). Basic Content Analysis. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983488

Wu, M.-W., & Shen, C.-H. (2013). Corporate social responsibility in the banking industry: Motives and financial performance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(9), 3529–3547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.04.023

Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth B. M. (2005). Qualitative analysis of content. 1-12. Retrieved from https://www.ischool.utexas.edu/~yanz/Content_analysis.pdf

Downloads

Published

2021-05-14

How to Cite

Tóth, F. (2021). Hidden preferences in social responsibility: The analysis of Erste SEEDS corporate social responsibility programme. Vezetéstudomány / Budapest Management Review, 52(5), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2021.05.02

Issue

Section

Articles