Co-Creation, Reflection, and Transformation

The Social Impact of a Service-Learning Course at the University of Szeged




responsible research and innovation (RRI), service-learning (SL), critical approach


This paper highlights three aspirations, which are shared by the diverse concepts and practices of responsible research and innovation (RRI): co-creation, reflexivity, and transformation. The authors analyse a service-learning (SL) initiative at the University of Szeged, Hungary, based on the model by Chupp and Joseph (2010). This provides a typology of SL practices and identifies four main approaches to the social impact of SL: traditional, critical, social justice oriented, and institutional change-focused approach. The authors also use this model to analyse the effects of their initiative with regard to the RRI principles of co-creation, reflexivity, and transformation. They provide evidence that their SL course may reach beyond its traditional (student-learning-based) effects in the Hungarian context, and embrace social justice and critical approaches. While the authors also found certain instances of institutionalisation, embedding critical SL into a Hungarian university and inducing significant institutional transformation seems to be a long way away.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Judit Juhász, University of Szeged

Assistant Research Fellow

György Málovics, University of Szeged

Associate Professor

Zoltán Bajmócy, University of Szeged

Associate Professor


Astin, A. W., & Vogelgesang, L. J., & Ikeda, E. K., & Yee, J. A. (2000). How service learning affects students. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA Graduate School of Education.

Bajmócy, Z., & Pataki, G. (2019). Responsible research and innovation and the challenge of co-creation. In Arno Bammé & Günter Getzinger (eds.), Yearbook 2018 of the Institute for Advanced Studies on Science, Technology and Society (pp. 1-15). München; Wien: Profil Verlag.

Bajmócy, Z., Gébert, J., Málovics, G., & Pataki, G. (2019). Miről szól(hatna) a felelősségteljes kutatás és innováció? Közgazdasági Szemle, 66(3), 286-304.

Ballard, S. M., & Elmore, B. (2009). A labor of love: Constructing a service-learning syllabus. Journal of Effective Teaching, 9(3), 70-76.

Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2015). InterViews. Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Butin, D. W. (2003). Of what use is it? Multiple conceptualizations of service learning within education. Teachers College Record, 105(9), 1674-1692.

Butin, D. W. (2006a). Special issue: Introduction future directions for service learning in higher education. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 18(1), 1–4.

Butin, D. W. (2006b). The limits of service-learning in higher education. The Review of Higher Education, 29(4), 473-498.

Chupp, M. G., & Joseph, M. L. (2010). Getting the most out of service learning: Maximizing student, university and community impact. Journal of Community Practice, 18(2-3), 190-212.

Furco, A. (1996). Service-Learning: A Balanced Approach to Experiential Education. In Furco, A. (ed.), Expanding Boundaries: Serving and Learning (pp. 2-6). Washington, DC: Corporation for National Service.

European Commission (EC) (2012). Responsible research and innovation. Europe’s ability to respond to societal challenges. Bruxelles: European Commission.

Edquist, C. (2013). Systems of innovation: technologies, institutions and organizations. London: Routledge.

Goddard, J. (2017). The strategic positioning of cities in 21st century challenges: the civic university and the city. In Grau, F.X. (Ed.), Higher education in the world 6. Towards a socially responsible university: balancing the global with the local (pp.115-127). Girona: Global University Network for Innovation.

Johnson, D. B. (2000). Faculty guide to service-learning. Washington, DC: Community service center Mary Graydon Center, American University.

Kezar, A., & Rhoads, R. A. (2001). The dynamic tensions of service learning in higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 72, 148-171.

Lundvall, B. A. (1988). Innovation as an interactive process: From user-producer interaction to national systems of innovation. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 349-369). London: Pinter Publishers.

Marullo, S., & Edwards, B. (2000). From charity to justice: The potential of university-community collaboration for social change. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(5), 895-912.

Nelson, R. R. (Ed.). (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.

Owen, R., Macnaghten, P., & Stilgoe, J. (2012). Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy, 39(6), 751-760.

De Saille, S. (2015). Innovating innovation policy: The emergence of ‘Responsible Research and Innovation’. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 2(2), 152-168.

Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42(9), 1568-1580.




How to Cite

Juhász, J., Málovics, G., & Bajmócy, Z. (2021). Co-Creation, Reflection, and Transformation: The Social Impact of a Service-Learning Course at the University of Szeged. Vezetéstudomány Budapest Management Review, 51(7), 6–17.