Developing effective R&D models in higher education
Criteria and structured approaches
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2024.11.05Keywords:
R&D model, higher education, framework development, innovation strategy, institutional competitivenessAbstract
This study provides a comprehensive framework for analysing and developing research and development (R&D) models in higher education. Despite the evolution of R&D management practices, there remains a lack of clearly defined models that ensure long-term flexibility and effective management within rapidly changing environments. Drawing on existing literature, this paper proposes criteria and structured approaches for higher education institutions (HEIs) to manage and facilitate R&D activities. By focusing on key dimensions such as mission alignment, research strategy, innovation strategy, and intellectual capital management, this study aims to offer practical guidelines to enhance the competitiveness and societal impact of HEIs. The goal is to move beyond general recommendations and provide a detailed criteria checklist to guide the development of effective R&D models.
Downloads
References
Ankrah, S., & AL-Tabbaa, O. (2015). Universities–industry collaboration: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31(3), 387-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2015.02.003
Aziz, M., & Tran, H. (2022). Enhancing institutional competitiveness: The CERTi approach to assessing faculty research development efforts in higher education. Journal of Research Administration, 53(1), 122-143. https://www.srainternational.org/blogs/sraijra1/2022/03/10/enhancing-institutional-competitiveness-the-certi
Barnett, H.G. (1953). Innovation: the basis of cultural change. McGraw Hill
Bozeman, B., & Boardman, C. (2014). Research collaboration and team science: A state-of-the-art review and agenda. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06468-0
Bozeman, B., Fay, D., & Slade, C.P. (2013). Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: the-state-ofthe- art. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(1), 1-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9281-8
Bromham, L., Dinnage, R., & Hua, X. (2016). Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success. Nature, 534(7609), 684-687. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18315
Busch, L. (2023). Knowledge for sale: The neoliberal takeover of higher education. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scx046
Bushaway, R. (2003). Managing Research. McGraw-Hill Education.
Cantwell, B., & Kauppinen, I. (Eds.) (2014). Academic Capitalism in the Age of Globalization. JHU Press.
Carl, J., & Menter, M. (2021). The social impact of universities: assessing the effects of the three university missions on social engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 46(5), 965–976. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2021.1896803
Clark, B.R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: organizational pathways of transformation. Issues in Higher Education. International Association of Universities and Elsevier Science Ltd.
Compagnucci, L., & Spigarelli, F. (2020). The Third Mission of the university: A systematic literature review on potentials and constraints. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120284
Connell, H. (2005). University Research Management: Meeting the Institutional Challenge. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264017450-en
Conti, A., Thursby, J., & Thursby, M. (2013). Patents as signals for startup financing. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 61(3), 592-622. https://doi.org/10.1111/joie.12025
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
Franzoni, C., Scellato, G., & Stephan, P. (2012). Foreign- born scientists: mobility patterns for 16 countries. Nature Biotechnology, 30(12), 1250-1253. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2449
Geuna, A., & Muscio, A. (2009). The governance of university knowledge transfer: A critical review of the literature. Minerva, 47, 93-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-009-9118-2
Geuna, A., & Nesta, L.J. (2006). University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence. Research Policy, 35(6), 790-807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.005
Grimaldi, M., Cricelli, L., Di Giovanni, M., & Rogo, F. (2015). The patent portfolio value analysis: A new framework to leverage patent information for strategic technology planning. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 94, 286-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.10.013
Grimaldi, M., Greco, M., & Cricelli, L. (2021). A framework of intellectual property protection strategies and open innovation. Journal of Business Research, 123, 156-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.043
Gulamov, A.A., Ozatbekov, Y.F. & Ozatbekova, O.N. (2022). Innovation-oriented way of development of a modern university. Journal of New Century Innovations, 15(3), 53-59.
Gunnarsson, M. (2012). Research strategies at universities. A brief survey of research strategies at institutional and departmental level. University of Gothenburg. http://hdl.handle.net/2077/32437
Hayter, C.S., Lubynsky, R., & Maroulis, S. (2017). Who is the academic entrepreneur? The role of graduate students in the development of university spinoffs. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 1237-1254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9470-y
Hazelkorn, E., & Herlitschka, S. (2010). Research strategy and management in universities. Higher education management and development. In J. Huisman & A. Pausits (Eds.), Higher Education Management and Development. Compendium for Managers (pp.131-146).Waxman Verlag GmbH. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271505496_Research_Strategy_and_Management_in_Universities
Hicks, D. (2012). Performance-based university research funding systems. Research Policy, 41(2), 251-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007
Holgersson, M., & van Santen, S. (2018). The business of intellectual property: a literature review of IP management research. Stockholm Intellectual Property Law Review, 1(1), 44-63. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3202847
Hottenrott, H., & Lawson, C. (2017). Fishing for complementarities: Research grants and research productivity. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 51, 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2016.12.004
Jackson, D.J. (2011). What is an innovation ecosystem? National Science Foundation.
Jalaliyoon, N., & Taherdoost, H. (2012). Performance evaluation of higher education; a necessity. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 46(1983), 5682- 5686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.497
Khan, P.A., Johl, S.K., Akhtar, S., Asif, M., Salameh, A.A., & Kanesan, T. (2022). Open innovation of institutional investors and higher education system in creating open approach for SDG-4 quality education: a conceptual review. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010049
Knight, H.J. (2013). Patent strategy: For researchers and research managers. John Wiley & Sons.
Krishnaveni, D.R., & Meenakumari, J. (2010). Usage of ICT for information administration in higher education institutions – a study. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 1(3), 282- 286. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijesd.2010.v1.55
Łącka, I., & Brzezicki, Ł. (2020). Efficiency of the research and development activities of technical universities in Poland. Nierówności Społeczne Społeczne aA Wzrost Wzrost GospodarczyGospodarczy, 63(3), 258-274. https://doi.org/10.15584/nsawg.2020.3.13
Laudel, G., & Gläser, J. (2014). Beyond breakthrough research: Epistemic properties of research and their consequences for research funding. Research Policy, 43(7), 1204-1216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.02.006
Lemley, M.A. (2015). Faith-based intellectual property. UCLA Law Review, 62, 1328. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2587297
Mars, M.M., & Burd, R. (2013). Impact over revenue: Toward a social entrepreneurship model for university technology transfer. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Organization Management, 2(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.4172/2169-026X.1000104
McDonnell-Naughton, M., & Păunescu, C. (2022). Facets of social innovation in higher education. In Păunescu, C., Lepik, K.L., Spencer, N. (Eds.), Social Innovation in Higher Education (pp. 9-35). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84044-0_2
Mico University. (2019). Institutional Research Policy. https://themico.edu.jm/policies
Mittelmeier, J., & Yang, Y. (2022). The role of internationalisation in 40 years of higher education research: major themes from Higher Education Research & Development (1982–2020). Higher Education Research & Development, 41(1), 75-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.2002272
Mohamed Hashim, M.A., Tlemsani, I., & Matthews, R. (2022). Higher education strategy in digital transformation. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 3171-3195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10739-1
Namara, R.B., Komakech, R.A., Rwemisisi, J.T., Namubiru, P.S., Alinda, F., & Barifaijo, M.K. (2023). Management of research in a post-graduate institute: quality assurance systems. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 49(4), 240-251. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2023/v49i41204
OECD. (1963). Proposed standard practice for surveys on research and experimental development, The ‘Frascati Manual’. OECD. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org
OECD. (1980). The measurement of scientific and technological activities ‘Frascati Manual’ manual’ 1980. OECD. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org
OECD. (1992). Oslo Manual: Proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data. OECD. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org
OECD. (1993). Frascati Manual 1993: Proposed standard practice for surveys on research and experimental development. OECD. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org
OECD. (2002). Frascati Manual: The measurement of scientific and technological activities. OECD. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org
OECD. (2005). Oslo Manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. OECD. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org
OECD. (2005). University Research Management: Developing Research in New Institutions. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264006966-en
OECD. (2015). Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for collecting and reporting data on research and experimental development. OECD. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org
OECD. (2018). Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation. OECD. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org
Perkmann, M., Salandra, R., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., & Hughes, A. (2021). Academic engagement: A review of the literature 2011-2019. Research Policy, 50(1), 104114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104114
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., & Krabel, S. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423-442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007
Pinto, J.K., & Slevin, D.P. (1989). Critical success factors in R&D projects. Research Technology Management, 32(1), 31–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.1989.11670572
Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., Britten, N., Roen, K., & Duffy, S. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. A product from the ESRC methods programme. Version 1. Lancaster University. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1018.4643
Qin, X., & Du, D. (2018). Measuring universities’ R&D performance in China’s provinces: a multistage efficiency and effectiveness perspective. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 30(12), 1392-1408. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2018.1473849
Radović, S., Hummel, H.G., & Vermeulen, M. (2023). The mARC instructional design model for more experiential learning in higher education: theoretical foundations and practical guidelines. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(6), 1173-1190. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1872527
Rana, S., Verma, S., Haque, M.M., & Ahmed, G. (2022). Conceptualizing international positioning strategies for Indian higher education institutions. Review of International Business and Strategy, 32(4), 503-519. https://doi.org/10.1108/RIBS-07-2021-0105
Rasli, A., Tee, M., Lai, Y.L., Tiu, Z.C., & Soon, E.H. (2022), October. Post-COVID-19 strategies for higher education institutions in dealing with unknown and uncertainties. Frontiers in Education, (7), 992063). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.992063
Ravi, R., & Janodia, M.D. (2022). Factors affecting technology transfer and commercialization of university research in India: A cross-sectional study. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(1), 787-803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00747-4
Rooksby, J.H. (2020). Understand IP considerations regarding online instruction. Campus Legal Advisor, 20(12). https://doi.org/10.1002/cala.40295
Schumpeter, J.A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Harvard University Press.
Siegel, D.S., & Wright, M. (2015). Academic entrepreneurship: time for a rethink? British Journal of Management, 26(4), 582-595. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12116
Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D.A., Atwater, L.E., & Link, A.N. (2004). Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21(1-2), 115-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2003.12.006
Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D., & Link, A. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study. Research Policy, 32(1), 27-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00196-2
Solievich, T.N. (2022). Specific aspects of improving the quality of education in higher education institutions. ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 12(9), 31-34. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-7137.2022.00759.5
Soranzo, B., Nosella, A., & Filippini, R. (2017). Redesigning patent management process: an action research study. Management Decision, 55(6), 1100-1121. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2016-0226
Stolze, A., & Sailer, K. (2022). Advancing HEIs’ third-mission through dynamic capabilities: The role of leadership and agreement on vision and goals. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 47(2), 580-604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09850-9
Tahmooresnejad, L., & Beaudry, C. (2018). Do patents of academic funded researchers enjoy a longer life? A study of patent renewal decisions. Plos One, 13(8), p.e0202643. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202643
Teixeira, A.A., & Ferreira, C. (2019). Intellectual property rights and the competitiveness of academic spin-offs. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4(3), 154-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2018.12.002
Thompson, V.A. (1965). Bureaucracy and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 10(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391646
Tien, N.H., Ngoc, N.M., Trang, T.T.T., & Mai, N.P. (2022). Sustainable development of higher education institutions in developing countries: Comparative Analysis analysis of Poland and Vietnam. Contemporary Economics, 16(2), 195-210. https://doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.477
Tijssen, R. (2011). Joint research publications: a performance indicator of university-industry collaboration. Evaluation in Higher Education, 5(2), 19-40. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263919226_Joint_research_publications_A_performance_indicator_of_university-industry_collaboration#fullTextFile-Content
Trommetter, M. (2008). Intellectual property rights in agricultural and agro-food biotechnologies to 2030. OECD International Futures Project. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/23984578_Intellectual_property_rights_in_agricultural_and_agro-food_biotechnologies_to_2030_C_OECD_International_Futures_Programme
Tumwebaze Alicon, A. (2022). Higher education research, development agendas in Africa. Where is the convergence? A literature review. On the Horizon, 30(4), 182–189. https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-04-2022-0021
Van de Ven, A.H. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32(5), 590-607. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.590
Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Wagner, C.S., Whetsell, T.A., & Mukherjee, S. (2019). International research collaboration: Novelty, conventionality, and atypicality in knowledge recombination. Research Policy, 48(5), 1260-1270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.002
Zomer, A., & Benneworth, P. (2011). The rise of the university’s third mission. In Reform of Higher Education in Europe (pp. 81-101). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-555-0_6
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Corvinus University of Budapest, publisher of Vezetéstudomány / Budapest Management Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors assign copyright to Vezetéstudomány / Budapest Management Review. Authors are responsible for permission to reproduce copyright material from other sources.
