Hasonlóság, vagy közeli kapcsolat? Az EEM és az ügynökelmélet analógiái

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2022.08-09.06

Keywords:

human resource management, agency theory, information asymmetry, rationality, conflict of interests

Abstract

This article aims to compare agency theory within organizational economics and Human Resource Management (HRM), namely as a system that aids the day-to-day practice of working managers. By identifying the connecting points and recognizing the similarities and differences, we can obtain valuable knowledge for both theory and practice, which can contribute to the development of organizational efficiency. The novelty of the essay is its comparison between the two frameworks and identification of the shared ideas. The authors’ fundamental assumption is: Agency theory and HRM offer the same solutions when examining human relations in the workplace. Studying the problems of human relationships analysed by the two frameworks, they concluded that despite independent starting points, different analytical methodologies and axioms, agency theory and HRM reach identical or similar conclusions in the investigation of human relationships. Their research concentrated on the empirical aspects and not on normative theory.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Zsuzsanna Kispál-Vitai, University of Pécs

Professor

Julianna Németh, University of Pécs

Assistant Lecturer

References

Allen, D.W. & Lueck, D. (1999). Searching for Ratchet Effects in Agricultural Contracts. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 24(2), 536-552. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40987037

Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P. & Kalleberg, A.L. (2000). Manufacturing Advantage: Why High-performance Work Systems Pay off. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Armstrong, M. (2006a). A handbook of Human Resource Management Practice (10. ed). London: Kogan Page.

Armstrong, M. (2006b). Strategic Human Resource Management – A guide to action (6. ed). London: Kogan Page.

Arrow, K. (1985). The Economics of Agency. In Pratt, J.W. & Zeckhauser, R.J. (Eds.), Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business (pp. 37-55). Boston: Harvard Business School Press

Balogh, G., Poór, J., Vinogradov, Sz., Illés, B. Cs., & Tóth, K. (2018). Személyzetfejlesztés. In Poór, J., Karoliny, M., Kovács, I. É., & Illés, B. Cs. (Eds.), A HR gyakorlata: Hasonló és eltérő jellemzők az emberi erőforrás-menedzsment globális, regionális és hazai gyakorlatának alakulásában (pp. 219-287). Budapest: Wolters Kluwer.

Beer, M., Spector, B. A., Lawrence, P. R., Mills, D. Q., & Walton, R. E. (1984). Managing human assets. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Bélyácz, I. (2017). Túlélő kiúttalanságok a vállalatirányításban. Köz-Gazdaság, 12(2), 249-267.

Boxall, P. F. & Purcell, J. (2011). Strategy and Human Resource Management (3. ed). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Boxall, P. F., Purcell, J., & Wright, P. (2007). Human Resource Management, Scope, Analysis and Singnificance. In The Oxford Handbook of Human Resource Management (pp. 1-17). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199547029.003.0001

Brewster, C. (2007). A European perspective on HRM. European Journal of International Management, 1(3), 239-259. http://www.itol.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/A-European-perspective-on-HRM.pdf

Cappelli, P. & Tavis, A. (2016). The Performance Management Revolution. Harvard Business Review, (10). https://hbr.org/2016/10/the-performance-management-revolution

Cardella, E. & Depew, B. (2018). Output restriction and the ratchet effect: Evidence from a real effort work task. Games and Economic Behavior, 107, 182-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2017.11.005

Chikán, A. (2020). Vállalatgazdaságtan [Digitális kiadás]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. https://doi.org/10.1556/9789634545897

Cowsgill, R. & Grint, K. (2008). Leadership, task and relationship: Orpheus, Prometheus and Janus. Human Resource Management Journal, 18, 188–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2007.00065.x

Dessler, G. & Chhinzer, N. (2017). Human Resources Management in Canada. Toronto: Pearson. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. The Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57-74. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279003

Fombrun, C. J., Tichy, M. M., & Devanna M. A. (1984). Strategic Human Resource Management. New York: John Wiley.

Foss, N. J. (2001). Bounded Rationality in the Economics of Organization: Present Use and (Some) Future Possibilities. Journal of Management and Governance, 5, 401-425. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014007330294

Foss, N. J. (2007). Agency Theory in Management [online]. https://organizationsandmarkets.com/2007/08/17/agency-theory-in-management/

Gibbons, R. & Roberts, J. (2015). Organizational Economics. In Scott, R. A. & Buchmann, M.C. (Eds.), Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772

Gooderham, P. & Nordhaug, O. (2010). One European model of HRM? Cranet empirical contributions. Human Resource Management Review, 21(1), 24-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.09.009

Grimshaw, D. & Rubery, J. (2007). Economics and HRM. In Boxall, P., Purcell, J. & Wright, P. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Human Resource Management (pp. 68-87). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Guest, D. E. & Convay, N. (2002). Communicating the psychological contract: an employer perspective. Human Resource Management Journal, 12(2), 22-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2002.tb00062.x

Holmstrom, B. & Milgrom, P. (1987). Aggregation and Linearity in the Provision of Intertemporal Incentives. Econometrica, 55(2), 303-328. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913238

Jensen, M. C. & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Jensen, M. C. & Smith, C. W. Jr. (1985). Stockholder, Manager and Creditor Interests, Applications of Agency Theory. In Altman E. & Subrahmanyam, M. (Eds.), Recent Advances in Corporate Finance. Boston: Dow-Jones Irwin. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228138310_Stockholder_Manager_and_Creditor_Interests_Applications_of_Agency_Theory

Jensen, M. C. (1983). Organization Theory and Methodology. The Accounting Review 58(2), 319 – 339. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.94036

Jurkowski, S. (2017). Electronic Surveillance, Legal Information Institute. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/electronic_surveillance

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking Fast and Slow. Farrar. New York: Straus and Giroux.

Kaufman, B. E. (2004). Toward an Integrative Theory of Human Resource Management. In B. E. Kaufman (Eds.), Theoretical Perspectives on Work and the Employment Relationship. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Kieser, A. & Ebers, M. (2006). Organisationstheorien (6. ed). Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer GmbH.

Kieser, A. (1995). Szervezetelméletek. Budapest: Aula Kiadó.

Kim, J. & Mahoney, J. T. (2005). Property Rights Theory, Transaction Costs Theory, and Agency Theory: An Organizational Economics Approach to Strategic Management. Managerial and Decision Economics, 26, 223-242. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1218

Klein, P. (1998). New Institutional Economics. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.115811

Krullaars, T. & Visbeen, J. (2015). The changing performance management paradigm: evolution or revolution? https://www.pwc.nl/nl/assets/documents/pwc-performance-survey-2015.pdf

Lawson, P. (1995). Performance management: an overview. In The Performance Management Handbook. London: Institute of Personnel and Development. Linder, S. & Foss, N. J. (2013). Agency Theory. SMG Working paper 2013(7). http://ssrn.com/abstract=2255895

Mathis, R. L., Jackson, J. H., & Valentine, S. R. (2014). Human Resource Management (14. ed). Stamford: CENGAGE Learning.

Metz, R. (2018). This company embeds microchips in its employees, and they love it. MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/s/611884/thiscompany-embeds-microchips-in-its-employees-andthey-love-it/

Mintzberg, H. (2005). Developing Theory about the Development of Theory. In Smith K.G. & Hitt, M.A. (Eds.), Great Minds In Management: The Process of Theory Development. New York: Oxford University Press.

Mohan, P. (2019). These are the worst scandals of the past decade. Fast Company. https://www.fastcompany.com/90444328/these-are-the-worst-scandals-of-thelast-decade

Muratbekova-Touron, M. & Galindo, G. (2018). Leveraging psychological contracts as an HR strategy: The case of software developers. European Management Journal, 36(6), 717-726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2018.01.001

Pepper, A. & Gore, J. (2015). Behavioral agency theory: new foundations for theorizing about executive compensation. Journal of Management, 41(4), 1045-1068. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312461054

Perrow, S. (1968). Economic Theories of Organization. Theory and Society, 15(1-2). 11-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00156926

Poór, J., Sipos, N., Szeiner, Zs., & Kovács, I. É. (2018). Ösztönzés és juttatások – javadalmazás. In Poór, J. Karoliny, M. Kovács, I. É. & Illés, B. Cs. (Eds.), A HR gyakorlata: Hasonló és eltérő jellemzők az emberi erőforrás-menedzsment globális, regionális és hazai gyakorlatának alakulásában (pp. 289-320). Budapest: Wolters Kluwer.

Pratt, J. W. & Zeckhauser, R. J. (1958). Principals and Agents: An Overwiev. In Pratt, J. W. & Zeckhauser, R. J (Eds.), Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business (pp. 1-35). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Purcell, J. (1999). Best practice or best fit: chimera or cul-desac. Human Resource Management Journal, 9(3), 26–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.1999.tb00201.x

Reilley, A. P. (2007). The changing HR function. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.

Robbins, S. P. & Barnwell, N. (2006). Organisation Theory: Concepts and cases (5. ed). Harlow: Pearson Education.

Robbins, S. P. & Judge T. (2013). Organizational behavior (15. ed). Boston: Pearson.

Roberts, J. (2010). Designing incentives in organizations. Journal of Institutional Economics, 6, 125-132. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137409990221

Segal, T. (2018). Enron Scandal: The Fall of a Wall Street Darling. https://www.investopedia.com/updates/enron-scandal-summary/

Szabó-Bálint, B. (2018). A munkavállalói siker és az elérését támogató szervezeti karriermenedzsment-eszközök. Vezetéstudomány, 49(10-11), 85-92. https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2018.10.08

Torrington, D., Hall, L., & Taylor, S. (2005). Human Resource Management (6. ed). Harlow: Pearson.

Torrington, D., Hall, L., & Taylor, S. (2014). Human Resource Management (9. ed), Harlow: Pearson.

Tosi, H., Werner, S., Katz, J., & Gomez-Mejia, L. (2000). How much does performance matter? A meta-analysis of CEO pay studies. Journal of Management, 26, 301- 339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600207

Toyota (2019). Toyota Production System. https://www. toyota-europe.com/world-of-toyota/this-is-toyota/toyota- production-system

Ulrich, D. & Brockbank, W. (2005). The HR Value Proposition. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Uysal, G. (2016). Human Resource Accounting: Cost and benefits analysis. Management Studies, 4(5). https://doi.org/10.17265/2328-2185/2016.05.001

Venczel-Szakó, T., Balogh, G. & Borgulya, I. (2021). Távmunka, home office. Hogyan érinti a távolról dolgozás a szervezet intern kommunikációját? Vezetéstudomány, 52(2), 73-86. https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2021.02.07

Verburg, R. M., Nienaber, A. M., Searle, R. H., Weibel, A., Den Hartog, D. N., & Rupp, D.E. (2018). The Role of Organizational Control Systems in Employees’ Organizational Trust and Performance Outcomes. Group & Organization Management, 43(2), 179–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601117725191

Wilkinson, A. Dundon, T. & Redman, T. (2021) Contemporary Human Resource Management, Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

Wiseman, R. M. & Gomez-Meija, L. R. (1998). A behavioral agency model of managerial risk-taking. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 133-153. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.192967

Downloads

Published

2022-09-13

How to Cite

Kispál-Vitai, Z., & Németh, J. (2022). Hasonlóság, vagy közeli kapcsolat? Az EEM és az ügynökelmélet analógiái. Vezetéstudomány / Budapest Management Review, 53(8-9), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2022.08-09.06

Issue

Section

Articles