What qualities do government-owned venture capital investors seek in a new venture?
A comparison of investment criteria across pre-seed, seed, and expansion stage startups
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2020.11.06Keywords:
venture capital, governmental venture capital, seed investment, investment criteria, startup financing, business planAbstract
Private venture capital (VC) investors usually do not invest in early life-cycle stage startups such as seed and pre-seed companies, since investment size typically doesn’t reach investment thresholds. The entry of governments with fund managers to venture capital markets presents seed and pre-seed companies with the opportunity to receive funding. This paper examines the main investment preferences of Hungarian government-owned venture capital investors regarding pre-seed, seed, and expansion stage startups. Verbal protocol analysis enabled examination of the screening process in real-time in all three life-cycle stages. It is found that governmental VC funds mostly value financial indicators followed by market-related qualities while private VCs value these characteristics in alternate formation. However, in the pre-seed stage, the financial acumen and capabilities of management teams form the main criteria in similarity to angel investors. Governmental VCs also greatly seek innovational value in target firms.
Downloads
References
Becsky-Nagy, P. & Fazekas, B. (2015). Investment or Learning Curve? The effects of EU and government funds on the development of the Hungarian venture capital market. Public Finance Quarterly, 60(2), 243-253.
Berlinger, E. (2019). How does the state destroy incentives in innovation financing? Economy and Finance: English-Language Edition of Gazdaság és Pénzügy, 6(3), 226-243. https://doi.org/10.33908%2FEF.2019.3.1
Bruno, A.V. & Tyebjee, T.T. (1983). The one that got away: A study of ventures rejected by capitalists. In J. A. Hornaday, J. A. Timmons & K. H. Vesper (Eds.), Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Proceedings of the 1983 Conference on Entrepreneurship, (pp. 289-306). Wellesley, US: Babson College.
Chiu, I. & Shu, L. H. (2010). Potential limitations of verbal protocols in design experiments. In ASME 2010. International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, (pp. 287-296). Montreal, Canada: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
Cho, J. Y., & Lee, E. (2014). Reducing Confusion about Grounded Theory and Qualitative Content Analysis: Similarities and Differences. The Qualitative Report, 19(32), 1-20. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR19/cho64.pdf
Colombo, M. G., Cumming, D. J. & Vismara, S. (2016). Governmental venture capital for innovative young firms. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(1), 10-24.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9380-9
Czyżewska, M., Mroczek, T., Lewicki, A. & Cwynar, A. (2016). The study of entrepreneurship growth drivers with the application of bayesian networks and global data. Humanitas University’s Research Papers Management, 17(4), 129-146. https://doi.org/10.5604/18998658.1232692
Daszyńska-Żygadło, K., Słoński, T. & Ligus, M. (2016). Investment in renewable energy technologies from the perspective of polish venture capital Funds. In: J. Krajíček, J. Nesleha, & K. Urbanovsky (Eds.), European Financial Systems 2016. Proceedings of the 13th International Scientific Conference, (pp. 79-85). Brno, Czech Republic: Masaryk University. Retrieved from https://is.muni.cz/do/econ/sborniky/2016/EFS2016-Proceedings_final_September_19_final.pdf
Dávid, Sz. D., & Becsky-Nagy, P. (2016). A kockázatitőkebefektetők kiválasztási kritériumai. Controller Info, 4(1), 22-29.
Dorsey, T. (1979). Operating Guidelines for Effective Venture Capital Funds Management. IC Institute, The University of Texas at Austin. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2152/27758
Ericsson, K. A. & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, US: The MIT Press.
Fazekas, B. (2018). Élet a piacon túl – Az állami hátterű kockázatitőke-finanszírozás elmélete és gyakorlata a magyarországi tapasztalatok tükrében (Doctoral dissertation). Debrecen, Hungary: Ihrig Károly Gazdálkodás- és Szervezéstudományok Doktori Iskola.
Fazekas, B. & Becsky-Nagy, P. (2019). Mit jelez a tulajdonosi szerkezet? – A tulajdonosi szerkezet és a vállalkozások teljesítményének kapcsolata információs aszimmetriák mellett a magyarországi kockázatitőkebefektetések tükrében. Vezetéstudomány, 50(7-8), 31- 38. https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2019.07.03
Fazekas, B. & Becsky-Nagy, P. (2020). Conceptualizing government venture capital agendas: The theoretical model of government backed venture capital funding. Under publication.
Hall, J. & Hofer, C. W. (1993). Venture capitalists’ decision criteria in new venture evaluation. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(1), 25-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(93)90009-T
Harrison, R. T., Mason, C. & Smith, D. (2015). Heuristics, learning and the business angel investment decisionmaking process. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 27(9-10), 527-554. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2015.1066875
Horváth, D., & Mitev, A. (2015). Alternatív kvalitatív kutatási kézikönyv. Budapest, Hungary: Aliena Kiadó.
Hsu, D. K., Haynie, J. M., Simmons, S. A. & McKelvie, A. (2014). What matters, matters differently: a conjoint analysis of the decision policies of angel and venture capital investors. Venture Capital, 16(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2013.825527
Invest Europe (2017). 2016 Private Equity Yearbook. Retrieved from https://www.investeurope.eu/media/652475/yearbook-2016-europe-and-countryoverview-tables-member-version-20170510.xlsx
Invest Europe (2019). 2018 Central and Eastern Europe Private Equity Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.investeurope.eu/media/2630/ie_cee_report_2018_final.pdf
Jáki, E. & Molnár, E. M. (2021). Venture capital and government involvement from a qualitative systematic literature review perspective. Acta Oeconomica, forthcoming.
Jáki, E. & Molnár, E. M. (2017). Model of the State and EU Involvement in the Venture Capital Market. In Z. Zoltay-Paprika et al. (Eds.), ECMS 2017: 31st European Conference on Modelling and Simulation, (pp. 120-126). Nottingham, UK: European Council for Modelling and Simulation.
Jáki, E., Molnár, E. M. & Walter, Gy. (2017). Government Sponsored Venture Capital: Blessing or Curse? Management (Slovenia), 12(4), 317-331. https://doi.org/10.26493/1854-4231.12.317-331
Kállay, L. & Jáki, E. (2019). The impact of state intervention on the Hungarian venture capital market. Economic Research – Ekonomska Istraživanja, 33(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1629979
Karsai, J. (2017). Furcsa pár. Az állam szerepe a kockázatitőke-piacon Kelet-Európában. Budapest, Hungary: Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány – MTA Közgazdaság- és Regionális Tudományi Kutatóközpont – Közgazdaságtudományi Intézet.
Karsai, J. (2018). Government venture capital in central and eastern Europe. Venture Capital, 20(1), 73-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2018.1411040
Karsai, J. (2019). Szakirodalmi áttekintés a korai fázisú, gyorsan növekvő innovatív vállalkozások tőkefinanszírozását segítő alternatív megoldásokról. Budapest, Magyarország: Közgazdaság- és Regionális Tudományi Kutatóközpont Közgazdaságtudományi Intézet.
Khan, A. M. (1987). Assessing venture capital investments with noncompensatory behavioral decision models. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(3), 193-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(87)90008-5
Lovas, A. (2015). The Risk of Adverse Selection and its Management in the Process of Venture Capital Investment. Economy and Finance: English Language Edition of Gazdaság és P énzügy, 2 (2), 186-202. http://unipub.lib.uni-corvinus.hu/2070/1/EF2015v2n2p186eng.pdf
Lovas, A. & Illés, R. (2018). A hazai kockázatitőkebefektetések értékelése, különös tekintettel a JEREMIEalapok befektetéseire. Külgazdaság, 62(7-8), 30-55. http://real-j.mtak.hu/12768/4/2018_K%C3%BClg7-8.pdf#page=30
Macmillan, I. C., Zemann, L. & Subbanarasimha, P. N. (1987). Criteria distinguishing successful from unsuccessful ventures in the venture screening process. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(2), 123-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(87)90003-6
Mason, C. & Stark, M. (2004). What do investors look for in a business plan? A comparison of the investment criteria of bankers, venture capitalists and business angels. International Small Business Journal, 22(3), 227-248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242604042377
Mason, C. & Botelho, T. (2016). The role of the exit in the initial screening of investment opportunities: The case of business angel syndicate gatekeepers. International Small Business Journal, 34(2), 157-175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242614563419
Muzyka, D., Birley, S. & Leleux, B. (1996). Tradeoffs in the investment decisons of European venture capitalists. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(4), 273-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(95)00126-3
Palyazat.gov.hu (2014): 2014-2020-as operatív programok társadalmi egyeztetése. Retrieved from https://www.palyazat.gov.hu/node/54899
Robinson, R. B. (1987). Emerging strategies in the venture capital industry. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(1), 53-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(87)90019-X
Sandberg, W. R., & Hofer, C. W. (1987). Improving new venture performance: The role of strategy, industry structure, and the entrepreneur. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(1), 5-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(87)90016-4
Sandberg, W. R., Schweiger, D. M. & Hofer, C. W. (1988). The Use of Verbal Protocols in Determining Venture Capitalists’ Decision Processes. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 13(2), 8-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225878801300204
Shepherd, D. A. (1999). Venture Capitalists’ Assessment of New Venture Survival. Management Science, 45(5), 621-632. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.5.621
Smith, D., Harrison, R. T. & Mason, C. (2010). Experience, heuristics and learning: the angel investment process. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 30(2). http://digitalknowledge.babson.edu/fer/vol30/iss2/3
Tyebjee, T. T. & Bruno, A. V. (1984). A Model of Venture Capitalist Investment Activity. Management Science, 30(9), 1051-1066. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1051
Zacharakis, A. L. & Meyer, G. D. (1995). The venture capitalist decision: understanding process versus outcome. In W. D. Bygrave, B. J. Bird, S. Birley, N. C. Churchill, M. Hay, R. H. Keeley & W. E. Wetzel Jr (Eds.), Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research 1995, (pp. 465-478). Wellesley, US: Babson College.
Zacharakis, A. L. & Meyer, G. D. (1998). A lack of insight: do venture capitalists really understand their own decision process? Journal of Business Venturing, 13(1), 57-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(97)00004-9
Zacharakis, A. L. & Shepherd, D. A. (2005). A nonadditive decision-aid for venture capitalists’ investment decisions. European Journal of Operational Research, 162(3), 673-689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2003.10.028
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Vezetéstudomány / Budapest Management Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors assign copyright to Vezetéstudomány / Budapest Management Review. Authors are responsible for permission to reproduce copyright material from other sources.
