A főnix-effektus – kiemelkedés a válságból a digitális együttműködés segítségével
Hogyan befolyásolja a válság a társadalmi vállalkozások digitalizációját az értékteremtés érdekében?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2025.07-08.02Kulcsszavak:
digitalizáció, közös értékteremtés, társadalmi vállalkozás, krízis, piaci turbulenciaAbsztrakt
A válság és a piaci turbulencia változásokat okozhat a társadalmi vállalkozások digitalizációjában és értékteremtésében. Ez a tanulmány azt kívánja meghatározni, hogy a válság és a piaci turbulencia hogyan befolyásolja a társadalmi vállalkozások digitalizációs alkalmazását az értékteremtés lehetővé tétele érdekében. Ennek eléréséért retrospektív esettanulmányokat végeztek a szerzők tíz fejlődő országbeli társadalmi vállalkozó megkérdezésével, és eredményeiket elsődleges és másodlagos adatokból szintetizálták. Eredményeik azt mutatják, hogy a digitális együttműködést alkalmazó társadalmi vállalkozások ellenállóbbak lehetnek a válságokkal szemben. Ezzel egyidejűleg a válság hatással van arra, hogy a társadalmi vállalkozások hogyan használják a digitalizációt az együttműködésre azokon az új jelenségeken keresztül, amelyeket válságálló digitális ökoszisztémának, transzformatív ellenálló képességi hálózatnak és szinergikus gazdasági ellenálló képességnek neveznek. Végül az összekapcsolt ellenállóképességi keretrendszert javasolják a piaci turbulencia és a társadalmi vállalkozások digitális együttműködése közötti kapcsolat szemléltetésére. Ez a modell és az eseményrendezett mátrix a társadalmi vállalkozással és válsággal foglalkozó szakirodalom fő elméleti hozzájárulásait képviseli.
Downloads
Hivatkozások
Aisaiti, G., Liang, L., Liu, L., Xie, J., & Zhang, T. (2021). How did social enterprises gain cognitive legitimacy in the post-pandemic period? Social welfare logic and digital transformation. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 121(12), 2697–2721. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-01-2021-0065
Aisaiti, G., Liu, L., Xie, J., & Yang, J. (2019). An empirical analysis of rural farmers’ financing intention of inclusive finance in China: The moderating role of digital finance and social enterprise embeddedness. Industrial Management and Data Systems 119(7), 1535–1563. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-08-2018-0374
Aliyev, K., Dehning, B., & Nadirov, O. (2016). Modelling the impact of fiscal policy on non-oil GDP in a resource rich country: evidence from Azerbaijan. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 64(6), 1869-1878. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201664061869
Bakir, C., Akgunay, S., & Coban, M. (2021). Financial Turbulence and Crisis. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1506
Bauwens, T., Huybrechts, B., & Dufays, F. (2020). Understanding the diverse scaling strategies of social enterprises as hybrid organizations: the case of renewable energy cooperatives. Organization & Environment, 33(2), 195-219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026619837126
Beke, D.D., Sólyom, A., & Klér, A.J. (2023). What managers can learn from knowledge intensive technology startups? Exploring the skillset for developing adaptive organizational learning capabilities of a successful start-up enterprise in management education. Society and Economy, 45(1), 68–90. https://doi.org/10.1556/204.2022.00027
Bierhoff, H.W. (2002). Just world, social responsibility, and helping behavior. In M. Ross & D. T. Miller (Eds.), The justice motive in everyday life (pp. 189-203). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499975.011
Brennen, S.J., & Kreiss, D. (2016). Digitalization. In K.B. Jensen, R.T. Craig, J.D. Pooley, & E.W. Rothenbuhler (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118766804.wbiect111
Chandna, V. (2022). Social entrepreneurship and digital platforms: Crowdfunding in the sharing-economy era. Business Horizons, 65(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2021.09.005
Dabija, D.C., & Frau, M. (2024). Leveraging artificial intelligence in marketing: Trend or the new normal? Oeconomia Copernicana, 15(4), 1173–1181. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.3390
Dacin, P.A., Dacin, M.T., & Matear, M. (2010). Social entrepreneurship: why we don’t need a new theory and how we move forward from here. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3), 37-57. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.24.3.37
de Bernardi, P., Bertello, A., & Venuti, F. (2019). Online and on-site interactions within alternative food networks: Sustainability impact of knowledge- sharing practices. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(5), 1457. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051457
Dekimpe, M., Gielens, K., Raju, J., & Thomase, J. (2011). Strategic assortment decisions in information-intensive and turbulent environments. Journal of Retailing, 87(suppl.1), s17-s28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2011.04.006
Dess, G.G., & Beard, D.W. (1984). Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(1), 52-73. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393080
Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
Eisenhardt, K.M., & Graebner, M.E. (2007). Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. The Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159839
Elia, G., Margherita, A., & Passiante, G. (2020). Digital entrepreneurship ecosystem: How digital technologies and collective intelligence are reshaping the entrepreneurial process. Technological Forecasting and Social Change (150). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119791.
Fan, Z.G., Wu, D., & Wu, X. (2013). Proactive and reactive strategic flexibility in coping with environmental change in innovation. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 21(2), 187-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2013.866316
Frau, M., Moi, L., & Cabiddu, F. (2020). Outside-in, inside- out, and blended marketing strategy approach: a longitudinal case study. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 12(3), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijms.v12n3p1
Frau, M., Cabiddu, F., Frigau, L., Tomczyk, P., & Mola, F. (2023). How emotions impact the interactive value formation process during problematic social media interactions. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 17(5), 773-793. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-06-2022-0186
Frau, M., Moi, L., Cabiddu, F., & Keszey, T. (2022). Time to clean up food production? Digital technologies, nature-driven agility, and the role of managers and customers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 377, 134376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134376
Goyal, S., Agrawal, A., & Sergi, B.S. (2021). Social entrepreneurship for scalable solutions addressing sustainable development goals (SDGs) at BoP in India. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 16(3-4), 509–529. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-07-2020-1992
Jáki, E., & Huszák, L. (2023). Lessons learned from entrepreneurship education: Foreword to the special collection. Society and Economy, 45(1), 1-7). https://doi.org/10.1556/204.2023.00002
Jaworski, B.J., & Kohli, A.K. (1993). Market orientation: antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(July), 53-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299305700304
Kennedy, B.L., & Thornberg, R. (2018). Deduction, induction, and abduction. In Flick, U. (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Collection (pp. 49-64). Sage.
Keszey, T. (2007). Az informatika helyzete és lehetőségei a magyar nagyvállalatok marketing- és értékesítési tevékenységének támogatásában. Vezetéstudomány/ Budapest Management Review, 38(11), 27-45. https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2007.11.03
Kohli, A.K., & Jaworski, B.J. (1990). Market orientation: the construct, research propositions and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251866
Kotler, P., & Caslione, J.A. (2009). Chaotics: the business of managing and marketing in the age of turbulence. Amacom.
Kumar, N., Stern, L.W., & Anderson, J.C. (1993). Conducting interorganizational research using key informants. Academic Management Journal, 36(6), 1633–1651. https://doi.org/10.5465/256824
Lenka, S., Parida, V., & Wincent, J. (2017). Digitalization capabilities as enablers of value co‐creation in servitizing firms. Psychology & Marketing, 34(1): 92-100. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20975
Lin, P.M.C., Peng, K.L., Ren, L., & Lin, C.W. (2019). Hospitality co-creation with mobility-impaired people. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 77, 492–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.08.013
Loukopoulos, A., & Papadimitriou, D. (2022). Organizational growth strategies for Greek social enterprises’ social impact during the COVID-19 pandemic. Social Enterprise Journal, 18(4), 541-562. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-10-2021-0084
Martín, G.R. (2020). Spanish crowdfunding is a new social tool for empowering sustainability. REVESCO Revista de Estudios Cooperativos, 135, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.5209/REVE.69182
Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Sage.
Milašinovic, S., & Kešetovic, Z. (2008). Crisis and crisis management-a contribution to a conceptual & terminological delimitation. Megatrend Review, 5(1), 167- 186. https://jakov.kpu.edu.rs/bitstream/id/2350/192.pdf
Mills, A.J., Durepos, G., & Wiebe E. (2010). Retrospective case study. In Mills, A.J., Durepos, G., & Wiebe, E. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research (pp. 825- 827). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412957397.n303
Moi, L., Frau, M., & Cabiddu, F. (2018). Exploring the Role of NVivo Software in Marketing Research. Mercati & Competitività, 4, 61-86. https://doi.org/10.3280/MC2018-004005
Mudambi, R. (2011). Proactive R&D management and firm growth: a punctuated equilibrum model. Research Policy, 40(3), 429-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.10.014
Muñoz, A.M.Á., Díaz, I.C.S., & Ibáñez, E.T. (2022). Perceived impacts of COVID-19 by Spanish university students: changes in the physical and social environments. In Brunn, S.D., & Gilbreath, D. (Eds.), COVID-19 and a World of Ad Hoc Geographies. (pp. 2059–2076). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94350-9_111
Mursalzade, H. (2024). Digital social entities, valuable communities: How digitalization enables value co-creation for social enterprises. Society and Economy, 46, 423-440. https://doi.org/10.1556/204.2024.00015.
Mursalzade, H., Molnár, L., & Saraswati, H.S. (2023). Digitalization and value co-creation in the context of social entrepreneurship. Vezetéstudomány/Budapest Management Review, 54(11), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2023.11.01
Prahalad, C.K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20015
Ratten, V. (2022). Coronavirus (COVID-19) and social value co-creation. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 42(3-4), 222–231. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-06-2020-0237
Roberts, D., & Woods, C. (2005). Changing the world on a shoestring: The concept of social entrepreneurship. University of Auckland Business Review, 7(1), 45-51. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242320433_Changing_the_World_on_a_Shoestring_The_Concept_of_Social_Entrepreneurship
Szabo, K., & Aranyossy, M. (2022). Nascent entrepreneurship – A bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review. Vezetéstudomány/Budapest Management Review, 53(11), 29-42. https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2022.11.03
Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-08-2016-1408
Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
Selsky, J.W., & Parker, B. (2010). Platforms for cross-sector social partnerships: prospective sensemaking devices for social benefit. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0776-2
Scheuerle, T., & Schmitz, B. (2015). Inhibiting factors of scaling up the impact of social entrepreneurial organisations – a comprehensive framework and empirical results for Germany. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 7(2), 127-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2015.1086409
Srivastava, S.C., & Shainesh, G. (2015). Bridging the service divide through digitally enabled service innovations. MIS Quarterly, 39(1), 245–268. https://doi.org/10.2307/26628349
Torres, P., & Augusto, M. (2020). Digitalization, social entrepreneurship and national well-being. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120279
Virágh, E.A., Tímár, G., & Pecze, K. (2024). Startup success from the founder’s perspective. Society and Economy, 46(4), 404-422. https://doi.org/10.1556/204.2023.00029
Wan, W., & Liu, L. (2021). Intrapreneurship in the digital era: driven by big data and human resource management? Chinese Management Studies, 15(4), 843-875. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-07-2020-0282
Wu, Y.J., Wu, T., & Arno Sharpe, J. (2020). Consensus on the definition of social entrepreneurship: a content analysis approach. Management Decision, 58(12), 2593–2619. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-11-2016-0791
Xiao, Y., & Beckmann, M. (2024). Where two are fighting, the third one does what? digitalisation and its effects on social entrepreneurship’s social-economic hybridity. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2024.2318375
Yin, R.K. (2008). Case study research: Design and models. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.30.1.108
Yin, R.K., (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (4th ed.). Sage. https://doi.org/10.33524/cjar.v14i1.73
Zahra, S.A. (2021). International entrepreneurship in the post-Covid world. Journal of World Business, 56(1), 101143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2020.101143
Letöltések
Megjelent
Folyóirat szám
Rovat
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Corvinus University of Budapest, publisher of Vezetéstudomány / Budapest Management Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors assign copyright to Vezetéstudomány / Budapest Management Review. Authors are responsible for permission to reproduce copyright material from other sources.
Hogyan kell idézni
