Roles of industry associations in industrial ecosystems
The case of Hungarian battery association
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2026.11.02Keywords:
battery industry, industry associations, organizational roles, meta-organizations, industrial network management, civil society organizationsAbstract
Industry associations play important roles in industrial ecosystems, yet their multiple functions are difficult to capture through a single theoretical perspective. This study examines the role configuration of the Hungarian Battery Association and evaluates the explanatory contributions of industrial network management, meta-organization theory, and civil society organization scholarship. Using a single-case design, the authors conducted a deductive codebook thematic analysis of HUBAs activities from its inception in 2021 to 2026. They find that all roles identified by industrial network management and meta-organization theory are evident in HUBA’s activities, but their presence varies while some roles predicted by CSO literature were either absent or partially evident in HUBA’s activities. The findings reveal that the same organization activity can fulfil theoretically distinct roles depending on their purpose, beneficiaries, and relational context. The study shows that combining the three perspectives provides a more comprehensive functional explanation of industry associations operating within strategic industrial ecosystems.
Downloads
References
Aarikka-Stenroos, L., & Halinen, A. (2007). The promoting role of third actors in initiating business relationships. The 23rd IMP Conference, Manchester, UK. https://impgroup.org/2007/01/01/the-promoting-role-of-third-actors-in-initiating-business-relationships/
Aarikka-Stenroos, L., Jaakkola, E., Harrison, D., & Mäkitalo-Keinonen, T. (2017). How to Manage Innovation Processes in Extensive Networks: A Longitudinal Study. Industrial Marketing Management, 67, 88–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.09.014
Ahrne, G., & Brunsson, N. (2008). Meta-Organizations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Ahrne, G., Brunsson, N., & Seidl, D. (2016). Resurrecting organization by going beyond organizations. European Management Journal, 34(2), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.02.003
Alo, O., & Arslan, A. (2023). Meta-organizations and environmental sustainability: An overview in African context. International Studies of Management & Organization, 53(2), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2023.2184119
Baksa, M. & Drótos, Gy. (2021). A szervezetek hálózatelmélete: gondolati lépések egy új paradigma felé. Magyar Tudomány, 182(1), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1556/2065.182.2021.1.11
Barringer, B.R., & Harrison, J.S. (2000). Walking a tightrope: creating value through interorganizational relationships, Journal of Management, 26(3), 367–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600302
Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (2000). ”Coopetition” in business networks–to cooperate and compete simultaneously. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(5), 411–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(99)00067-X
Berkowitz, H. (2026). Society of Meta-Organizations. Open Book Publishers. https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0505
Berkowitz, H., & Bor, S. (2024). Meta-organizations for sustainability transformations: Navigating tensions between imperatives of transition and meta-organizationality. Journal of Organizational Sociology, 2(1), 29–58. https://doi.org/10.1515/joso-2023-0001
Berkowitz, H., & Grothe-Hammer, M. (2022). From a clash of social orders to a loss of decidability in meta- organizations tackling grand challenges: The case of Japan leaving the International Whaling Commission. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 79, 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20220000079010
Berkowitz, H., Brunsson, N., Grothe-Hammer, M., Sundberg, M., & Valiorgue, B. (2022). Meta-organizations: A clarification and a way forward. M@n@gement, 25(2), 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.37725/mgmt.v25.8728
Berkowitz, H., & Souchaud, A. (2024). Filling successive technologically-induced governance gaps: Meta-organizations as regulatory innovation intermediaries. Technovation, 129, 102890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102890
Bor, S., & Cropper, S. (2023). Extending meta-organization theory: a resource-flow perspective. Organization Studies, 44(12), 1939–1960. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084062311859
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360
Borgatti, S.P., & Foster, P.C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29(6), 991–1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00087-4
Borgatti, S.P., Mehra, A., Brass, D.J., & Labianca, G. (2009). Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, 323(5916), 892–895. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165821
Csonka, L. (2011). Kutatás-fejlesztési és innovációs hálózatok működése az autóiparban, Vezetéstudomány, 42(4), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2011.04.02
Czirfusz, M. (2023). The battery boom in Hungary: Companies of the value chain, outlook for workers and trade unions. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
Dóra, T.B., & Szalkai, Zs. (2021). The impacts of a new type of actor as an intermediary in public–private collaboration in health-care prevention. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 36(3), 420–435, https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-12-2019-0509
Dumez, H., & Renou, S. (2020). How business organizes collectively: An inquiry on trade associations and other meta-organizations. Edward Elgar Publishing.
EC. (2017). Investing in a smart, innovative and sustainable Industry, A renewed EU Industrial Policy Strategy. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52017DC0479
EC. (2019). Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic Social Committee, the Committee of the regions and the European Investment Bank on the Implementation of the Strategic Action Plan on Batteries, Building a Strategic Battery Value Chain in Europe.
European Commission. EC. (2020). A New Industrial Strategy for Europe. European Commission COM (2020) 102 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex-:52020DC0102
Edwards, M. (2011). Introduction: Civil society and the geometry of human relations. In Edwards, M. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of civil society (pp. 3–14). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398571.013.0001
Gieschen, J., Bünting, B., Kruse, S., Vorholt, F., Wolf, S., & Zachäus, S. (2021). Battery cell manufacturing ecosystem in Europe, Network structures as a basis for knowledge transfer and value creation partnerships. VDI/VDE Innovation + Technik GmbH. https://www.ipcei-batteries.eu/fileadmin/Files/accompanying-research/media/download/Battery_cell_manufacturing_ecosystem_Europe.pdf
Grandori, A (1997). An Organizational Assessment of Interfirm Coordination Modes. Organization Studies, 18(6), 897–925. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069701800601
Guénéheux, D., & Bottomley, A. (2014). Accountability for Civil Society by Civil Society: A Guide to Self-Regulation Initiatives. CIVICUS.
Håkansson, H., & Ford, D. (2002). How Should Companies Interact in Business Networks? Journal of Business Research, 55(2), 133–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00148-X
Hoff, J., Gausset, Q., & Lex, S. (2020). The role of nonstate actors in the green transition: Building a sustainable future. Routledge.
Hoványi, G. (2008). Vállalati hálózatok kompatibilis irányítása – útmutató egy hálózat korszerű irányításához. Vezetéstudomány, 39(6), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2008.06.02
HUBA (2022). Articles of Association. Hungarian Battery Association.
HUBA (2025). Articles of Association. Hungarian Battery Association.
ITM. (2021). National Battery Industry Strategy. Budapest: Ministry of Technology and Innovation.
Jacobides, M.G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer A. (2018).Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2255–2276. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2904
Järvensivu, T., & Möller, K. (2009). Metatheory of Network Management: A Contingency Perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 38(6), 654–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2009.04.005
Knight, L., & Harland, C. (2005). Managing Supply Networks: Organizational Roles in Network Management. European Management Journal, 23(3), 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2005.04.006
Kronstein, B. (2026). Far right political ecologies and the battery sector: The case of the CATL gigafactory in Debrecen, Hungary. Political Geography, 127, 103522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2026.103522
Kun, R. (2025). Energiatárolási és akkumulátoripari alapismeretek. Akadémiai Kiadó.
Mandják, T., Szántó, Z. (2011). Az üzleti kapcsolatok menedzsmentjének gondolati modellje. Vezetéstudomány, 42(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2011.01.01
Möller, K., & Halinen, A. (1999). Business Relationships and Networks: Managerial Challenge of Network Era. Industrial Marketing Management, 28(5), 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(99)00086-3
Neuendorf, K.A. (2017). The Content Analysis Guidebook (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Patrizio, P., Pratama, Y.W., & Dowell, N.M. (2020). Socially equitable energy system transitions. Joule, 4(8), 1700–1713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2020.07.010
Reveley, J., & Ville, S. (2010). Enhancing industry association theory: a comparative business history contribution. Journal of Management Studies, 47(5), 837–858. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00926.x
Salamon, L.M., Sokolowski, S.W., & Haddock, M. (2017). Explaining civil society development: A social origins approach. John Hopkins University Press.
Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Snow, C.C., Miles, R.E., & Coleman, H.J. (1992). Managing 21st Century Network Organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 20(3), 5–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(92)90021-E
Szalkai, Zs., & Dóra, T.B. (2020). Szervezetközi kapcsolatok vizsgálata az egészségügyi prevencióban. Vezetéstudomány, 51(Különszám), 114–124. http://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2020.KSZ.10
Union of International Associations (UIA). (2023). Yearbook of international organizations. https://uia.org/yearbook
Valente, M., & Oliver, C. (2018). Meta-organization formation and sustainability in Sub-Saharan Africa. Organization Science, 29(4), 678–701. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1191
Yang, L. (2024). Dynamic interactions among exchange rate, natural gas demand, production in manufacturing and battery industry export–evidence from Hungary. Gazdaság & Társadalom| Journal of Economy & Society, 17(35), 29–47. https://doi.org/10.21637/GT.2024.1.02
Yin, R.K. (2018). Case study research and applications (6th ed.). SAGE.
Vicsek, L.M., Király, G., & Kónya, H. (2016). Networks in the social sciences: Comparing actor-network theory and social network analysis. Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 7(2), 77–102. https://doi.org/10.14267/cjssp.2016.02.04
WEF (2013). The future role of civil society. World Economic Forum. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_FutureRoleCivilSociety_Report_2013.pdf
WEF. (2023). Strengthening public-private cooperation with civil society. World Economic Forum.
Wu, Q.M. (2024). The embrace and resistance of Chinese battery investments in Hungary: The case of CATL. Asia Europe Journal, 22(2), 201–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-024-00699-9
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Corvinus University of Budapest, publisher of Vezetéstudomány / Budapest Management Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors assign copyright to Vezetéstudomány / Budapest Management Review. Authors are responsible for permission to reproduce copyright material from other sources.
How to Cite
