Energy content on the menu – what does the eye see, what does the eye-tracker see?

Authors

  • Dorina Szakál Budapest University of Economics and Business
  • Zsófia Fekete-Frojimovics Budapest University of Economics and Business
  • Andrea Lugasi Budapest University of Economics and Business

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14267/TURBULL.2025v25n1.4

Keywords:

eye-tracker, menu, energy labelling, visual attention

Abstract

It is a well-known fact that nutrition labelling on menus can help consumers make better food choices and support them in achieving a healthier lifestyle. The ways in which nutrition labelling can be used on menus can be very diverse, and so it remains to be seen which best supports consumer decision-making. Our research, supported by a modern measurement tool (a Tobii Pro Fusion eye-tracker) aimed to determine which of the three different restaurant menu energy-labelling alternatives we use best captures the visual attention and helps consumers make informed choices. The best alternative could contribute to the optimal design of restaurant menus. The only difference among the three menus was in the way in which the energy content was displayed. In the first alternative the energy content expressed in „kcal” of each meal was displayed in monochrome; in the second the numbers were accompanied by colours (red, yellow, green); in the third a coloured (red, yellow, green) battery symbol helped participants. Research was conducted in September 2023, analysis included data from 60 participants. The research was conducted in September 2023, and the analysis included data from 60 participants. The results suggest that symbols do not attract the attention of consumers, and so they are not recommended. Since the display of the energy content is the most appropriate and useful reference point for consumers.

References

BOZ, H. – BOZ, B. (2019): The Influence of Employee Attractiveness on Service Recovery Paradox: Facial Recognition and Eye Tracker Analyses. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 10(3). pp. 96–105.

CSAPODY B. (2023): Helyből jobb? – A rövid alapanyagellátási lánc szerepe a magyar vidéki vendéglátás rendszerében. Turizmus Bulletin. 23(2). pp. 14–23. https://doi.org/10.14267/ turbull.2023v23n2.2

CSORDÁS T. – IRIMIÁS A. – KISS K. (2022): Digitalizáció-vezérelt innovációk a turizmusban – fókuszban a fogyasztói magatartás. Turizmus Bulletin. 22(4). pp. 16–25. https://doi. org/10.14267/TURBULL.2022v22n4.2

DANNER, L. – DE ANTONI, N. – GERE, A. – SIPOS, L. – KOVÁCS, S. – DÜRRSCHMID, K. (2016): Make a choice! Visual attention and choice behaviour in multialternative food choice situations. Acta Alimentaria. 45(4). pp. 515–524. https://doi.org/10.1556/066.2016.1111

GURGU, E. – GURGU, I. A. – TONIS, R. B. M. (2020): Neuromarketing for a better understanding of consumer needs and emotions. Independent Journal of Management & Production. 11(1). 208– 235. https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v11i1.993

KIM, E. – HAM, S. (2016): Restaurants’ disclosure of nutritional information as a corporate social responsibility initiative: Customers’ attitudinal and behavioral responses. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 55. pp. 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.02.002

KIM, E. L. T. – TANG, L. R. – MEUSEL, C. – GUPTA, M. (2018): Optimization of Menu Labeling Formats to Drive Healthy Dining: An Eye Tracking Study. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 70. pp. 37–48. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.10.020

KÖSTER, E. – MOJET, J. (2018): Complexity of Consumer Perception: Thoughts on Pre– Product Launch Research. In: Methods in Consumer Research. New Approaches to Classic Methods (Vol. 1). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi. org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102089-0.00002-9

KUO, C. – BAVIK, A. – FÁTIMA, H. – NGAN, B. – YU, C. (2020): The sweet spot in the eye of the beholder? Exploring the sweet sour spots of Asian restaurant menus. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management. 30(2). pp. 242–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2020.1790076

MAGNINI, V. P. – KIM, S. (2016): The influences of restaurant menu font style, background color, and physical weight on consumers’ perceptions. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 53. pp. 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.11.001

MICHALKÓ G. (2023): A jó hely – egy turizmusorientált koncepcióvázlat. Tér és Társadalom. 37(4). pp. 30–50. https://doi.org/ 10.17649/TET.37.4.3519

MORA, M. – ROMEO-ARROYO, E. – CHAYA, C. – GAYOSO, L. – LARRAÑAGA-AYASTUY, E. – VÁZQUEZ-ARAÚJO, L. (2023): Eating with the eyes? Tracking food choice in restaurant’s menu. Food Quality and Preference. 110(August). 104956. pp. 2–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. foodqual.2023.104956

NGAN, H. F. B. – BAVIK, A. – KUO, C. F. – YU, C. E. (2022): Where you Look Depends on What you are Willing to Afford: Eye Tracking in Menus. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research. 46(1). pp. 100–124. https://doi. org/10.1177/1096348020951226

ÖZAYDIN, C. – GÜZELLER, C. O. (2023): Examining the Selections in Restaurant Menus with Eye-Tracking Technique. Journal of Tourism & Gastronomy Studies. 9(3). pp. 1460–1481. https://doi.org/10.21325/jotags.2021.849

ÖZKUL, E. – BILGILI, B. – KOÇ, E. (2020): The influence of the color of light on the customers’ perception of service quality and satisfaction in the restaurant. Color Research and Application. 45(6). pp. 1217–1240. https://doi.org/10.1002/ col.2256

PIQUERAS-FISZMAN, B. – SPENCE, C. (2015): Sensory expectations based on product-extrinsic food cues: An interdisciplinary review of the empirical evidence and theoretical accounts. Food Quality and Preference. 40(PA). pp. 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.09.013

POPIEN, A. – FRAYN, M. – RANSON, K. M. VON – SEARS, C. R. (2015): Eye gaze tracking reveals heightened attention to food in adults with binge eating when viewing images of real world scenes. Appetite. 91. pp. 233–240. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.04.046

REALE, S. – FLINT, S. (2016): The Impact of Menu Label Design on Visual Attention, Food Choice and Recognition: An Eye Tracking Study. Food Choice and Recognition. 31(4). pp. 328–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/joss.12216

ROBERTSON, D. A. – LUNN, P. D. (2020): The effect of spatial location of calorie information on choice, consumption and eye movements. Appetite. 144. 104446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. appet.2019.104446

SCHWEBLER, S. A. – HARRINGTON, R. J. – OTTENBACHER, M. C. (2020): Calorie disclosure and color-coding on QSR menus: A multi-method approach using eye-tracking technology, grouping and surveys. International Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Administration. 21(1). pp. 38–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/152564 80.2018.1429339

SMITH, J. K. – JACOB, D. G. – JACOB, D. B. – BARBARA, S. C. (2019): An Eye-Tracking Analysis of a Restaurant Menu. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 63(1). pp. 1522–1526. https://doi. org/10.1177/1071181319631347

SZAKÁL, D. – CAO, X. – FEHÉR, O. – GERE, A. (2023): How do ethnically congruent music and meal drive food choices? Current Research in Food Science. 6(February). https://doi.org/10.1016/j. crfs.2023.100508

SZAKÁL D. – FEHÉR O. – RADVÁNYI D. – GERE A. (2022): Effect of Scents on Gazing Behavior and Choice. Applied Sciences. 16. 6899. https:// doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/app12146899

SZAKÁLY O. (2023): A gasztronómiai fogyasztók szegmentálása az online aktivitás és az influencerkövetés szemszögéből. Turizmus Bulletin. 23(1). pp. 4–14. https://doi.org/10.14267/ turbull.2023v23n1.1

TAPPER, K. – YARROW, K. – FARRAR, S. T. – MANDEVILLE, K. L. (2022): Effects of calorie labelling and contextual factors on hypothetical coffee shop menu choices. Appetite. 172(February). 105963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. appet.2022.105963

TOBAK, J. – NÉMETH, E. – SZULTOS, B. (2024): A kultúra, mint a területfejlesztés eszköze – Fókuszban a Pajta Program. Turizmus Bulletin. 24(4). pp. 37–46. https://doi.org/10.14267/ TURBULL.2024v24n4.4

VAN DER LAAN, L. N. – HOOGE, I. T. C. – DE RIDDER, D. T. D. – VIERGEVER, M. A. – SMEETS, P. A. M. (2015): Do you like what you see? The role of first fixation and total fixation duration in consumer choice. Food Quality and Preference. 39. pp. 46–55. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.06.015

VU, T. M. H. – TU, V. P. – DUERRSCHMID, K. (2016): Design factors influence consumers’ gazing behaviour and decision time in an eye tracking test: A study on food images. Food Quality and Preference. 47. pp. 130–138. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.05.008

Downloads

Published

2025-04-10

How to Cite

Szakál, D., Fekete-Frojimovics, Z., & Lugasi, A. (2025). Energy content on the menu – what does the eye see, what does the eye-tracker see?. Turizmus Bulletin, 25(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.14267/TURBULL.2025v25n1.4

Issue

Section

Articles