Helicopter Money and Basic Income, or a Work-Based Society?
A Brief History of Wages, Benefi ts, Loans and Quantitative Easing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35551/PFQ_2022_1_3Keywords:
helicopter money, loan, money creation, quantitative easing, central bank, commercial bank, B52, D33, E12, E42, E49Abstract
Following the coronavirus outbreak, and especially before infl ation became a key factor in this period, several crisis management proposals raised the possibility of a universal basic income, which could be backed by the central bank’s money creation. Th e following paper is an essay that seeks to grasp the political economic meaning and implications of the propositions related to helicopter money and basic income. We cannot avoid observing the essence of these proposals, presented fundamentally as a distribution-related issue, in the historical context of value, work and money creation. Helicopter money appears in this light as a new paradigm of extensive growth, which at fi rst glance comes off as a fi nancial innovation, but paradoxically rather bears a relationship with a pre-capitalist conception of value. Moreover, helicopter money is a wage-substitute transfer that does not respond to the social and symbolic void that has replaced work. It appears to be a welfare instrument, while it can only rest on the separation of production and consumption on a global scale. Helicopter money is an extension of quantitative easing by other means, which unveils the motives for money creation. It is an overture to the thought experiments of ‘value without work’ and ‘economy without people’.
References
Bánfi T. (2016). A pénz forradalma: a pénzteremtés elmélete és gyakorlata. Cenzus Bt., 2016
Bánfi T. (2017). Észrevétel a Pénzteremtés a modern gazdaságban című tanulmányhoz. Pénzügyi Szemle, 62(1), 120. oldal
Bertocco, G. (2007). The characteristics of a monetary economy: a Keynes–Schumpeter approach. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 31(1), pp. 101–122
Bihari P. (2020). Helikopterpénz kell Magyarországra a koronavírus ellen. https://www.portfolio.hu/gazdasag/20200330/helikopterpenz-kell-magyarorszagra-a-koronavirus-ellen–422750
Blanc, J. (1998). Silvio Gesell’s Theory and Accelerated Money Experiments halshs–00119192. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00119192/document
Botos K. (2016). Pénzteremtés a modern gazdaságban. Pénzügyi Szemle, 61(4), 456. oldal
Crouch, C. (2009). Privatised Keynesianism: An unacknowledged policy regime. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 11(3), pp. 382–399
Friedman, M. (1969). The Optimum Quantity of Money and Other Essays. Chicago: Aldine, pp. 1–50
Ilgmann, C. (2015). Silvio Gesell: „A strange, unduly neglected” monetary theorist. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 38(4), pp. 532–564, https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.2015.1099446
Jakab, Z., Kumhof, M. (2018). Banks are not intermediaries of loanable funds–facts, theory and evidence. Bank of England Working Paper No. 761, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3274706
Massenot, B. (2021). Helicopter Money will be Spent, Economists Unanimously Find. https://www.positivemoney.eu/2021/07/helicopter-money-effectiveness-research-review/
Mencinger, J. (2017). Universal Basic Income and Helicopter Money. Basic Income Studies, 12(2), https://doi.org/10.1515/bis-2016-0021
Mitchell, W. F. (2020). Debt and Deficits–A Modern Monetary Theory Perspective. Australian Economic Review, 53(4), pp. 566–576, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8462.12400
Polányi K. (2004). A nagy átalakulás. Napvilág Kiadó
Németh E. (2019): Segély helyett rámpát – A külső-belső kontroll attitűd és a szegénység kapcsolata. Annales, Universitas Budapestiensis De „ Metropolitan”, (12), 29–46. oldal
Samuelson, P. A. (1983). Marx, Keynes and Schumpeter. Eastern Economic Journal, 9(3), pp. 166–179
van Rooij, M., de Haan, J. (2019). Would helicopter money be spent? New evidence for the Netherlands. Applied Economics, 51(58), pp. 6171–6189, https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2019.1613504
Wray, L. R. (1999). Theories of value and the monetary theory of production. Levy Economics Ins-titute Working Paper No. 261
Kela (2020). Results of Finland’s basic income experiment: small employment effects, better perceived economic security and mental wellbeing. https://www.kela.fi/web/en/news-archive/-/asset_publisher/lN08GY2nIrZo/content/results-of-the-basic-income-experiment-small-employment-effects-better-perceived-economic-security-and-mental-wellbeing
