Features of non-traditional touristic mobility in Hungary, especially in respect of a potential increase in tourismrelated revenue

Authors

  • Gábor Michalkó Corvinus University of Budapest
  • Noémi Ilyés Hungarian Tourism Association Foundation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14267/TURBULL.2020v20n4.1

Keywords:

invisible tourism, unconventional tourism mobility, tourism statistics, GDP

Abstract

Changes in the nature of tourism emerging after the turn of the millennium demand a rethink in terms of interpretation and measurement. The political sphere, in cooperation with tourism organizations, statistical institutes and academic research centres, is striving to find an up-to-date interpretation of the economic, social and environmental impacts of the new travel-related phenomena. The traditional interpretation of tourism, based on the use of commercial accommodation, is now out-of-date, and the volume of touristic movement driven by unconventional tourism mobility should also be taken into account in formulating strategy, legislative preparation, development decisions and in the operation of supporting systems. In this study, we try to achieve a balance between theory and practice based on a review of domestic and international literature and a secondary analysis of UNWTO and CSO databases, our purpose being to recognize the potential of so-called invisible tourism. This lies outside statistical data collection but may contribute substantially to the growth of tourism-related revenues both at regional and national level.

References

BACKER, E. – KING, B. (2017): VFR traveller demographics: The Social Tourism Dimension. Journal of Vacation Marketing. 23(3). pp. 191– 204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356766716665439

BACKER, E. (2007): VFR travel: An examination of the expenditures of VFR travellers and their hosts. Current Issues in Tourism. 10(4). pp. 366– 377. https://doi.org/10.2167/cit277.0

BAUM, T. – LUNDTORP, S. (2001): Seasonality in tourism. Pergamon, Amsterdam.

BRIDA, J. – RISSO, W. (2010): Tourism as a determinant of long-run economic growth. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events. 2(1). pp. 14–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/19407960903542276

DE CANTIS, S. – PARROCO, A. – FERRANTE, M. – VACCINA F. (2015): Unobserved Tourism. Annals of Tourism Research. 50(January). pp. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2014.10.002

EU (2011): Regulation (EU) No 692/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 2011 concerning European statistics on tourism and repealing Council Directive 95/57/EC.

EURÓPAI BIZOTTSÁG (2016): A Bizottság jelentése az Európai Parlamentnek és a Tanácsnak a turizmusra vonatkozó európai statisztikákról szóló 692/2011/EU európai parlamenti és tanácsi rendelet alapján a felhatalmazáson alapuló jogi aktusok elfogadása tekintetében az Európai Bizottságra ruházott jogkör gyakorlásáról. 2016. 1. 20. COM 2016 4. final, Brüsszel

GALLENT, N. – MACE, A. – TEWDWR-JONES, M. (2016): Second homes: European perspectives and UK policies. Routledge, Boca Raton.

GRIFFIN, T. – NUNKOO, R. (2016): Paid accommodation use of international VFR multidestination travellers. Tourism Review. 71(2). pp. 90–104. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-09-2015-0041

HÄNSEL, M. – METZNER, T. (2011): Visiting friends & relatives (VFR): Ambiguity of an underestimated form of tourism. In: Papathanassis, A. (ed): The long tail of tourism: holiday niches and their impact on mainstream tourism. Springer, Wiesbaden. pp. 35–44.

HEUNG-RYEL, K. – CHANGHYO, Y. – YOONJEUNG, J. (2019): Relationships among overseas travel, domestic travel, and day trips for latent tourists using longitudinal data. Tourism Management. 72(June). pp. 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.11.018

HINCH, T. – JACKSON, E. – HUDSON, S. – WALKER, G. (2005): Leisure constraint theory and sport tourism. Sport in Society. 8(2). pp. 142–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430430500087435

ILYÉS N. (2017): Turizmus Budapest árnyékában: láthatatlan turisták Szentendrén. In: Juhász P. – Wimmer Á. (szerk.): Közgáz diáktudós – Gazdaság, közösség, társadalom. Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem, Budapest. pp. 23–36.

McKERCHER, B. – MAK, B. (2019): The impact of distance on international tourism demand. Tourism Management Perspectives. 31(July). pp. 340–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2019.07.004

MICHALKÓ G. – RÁTZ T. – KESZEG R. (2016): A határokon átívelő tanulmányi kirándulások szerepe a nemzetépítésben: a „Határtalanul!” program társadalomföldrajzi vizsgálata. Kisebbségkutatás. 26(2). pp. 36–58.

MICHALKÓ G. – RÁTZ T. (2013): Rejtett dimenziók a Kárpát-medence turizmusában. In: Frisnyák S. – Gál A. (szerk.): Kárpát-medence: természet, társadalom, gazdaság. Bocskai István Gimnázium – Nyíregyházi Főiskola, Nyíregyháza – Szerencs. pp. 463–476.

MICHALKÓ G. (2012): Turizmológia: elméleti alapok. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.

MICHALKÓ, G. – RÁTZ, T. – HINEK, M. – TÖMÖRI, M. (2014): Shopping tourism in Hungary during the period of the economic crisis. Tourism Economics. 20(6). pp. 1319– 1336. https://doi.org/10.5367/te.2014.0387

PEREZ-RODRÍGUEZ, J. – LEDESMA-RODRÍGUEZ, F. – SANTANA-GALLEGO, M. (2015): Testing dependence between GDP and tourism’s growth rates. Tourism Management. 48(June). pp. 268–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.11.007

PROVENZANO, D. – HAWELKA, B. – BAGGIO, R. (2018): The mobility network of European tourists: a longitudinal study and a comparison with geo-located Twitter data. Tourism Review. 73(1). pp. 28–43. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-03-2017-0052

RÁTZ, T. – KUNDI, V. – MICHALKÓ, G. (2015): The hidden dimensions of cultural consumption within the framework of tourism mobility. In: Sonnenburg, S. – Wee, D. (eds): Touring Consumption. Springer, Wiesbaden. pp. 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10019-3_13

SCUTTARI, A. – LUCIA, M. – MARTINI, U. (2013): Integrated planning for sustainable tourism and mobility. A tourism traffic analysis in Italy’s South Tyrol region. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 21(4). pp. 614–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2013.786083

SMITH, M. – EGEDY, T. – CSIZMADY, A. – JANCSIK, A. – OLT, G. – MICHALKÓ, G. (2018): Non-planning and tourism consumption in Budapest’s inner city. Tourism Geographies. 20(3). pp. 524–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2017.1387809

TOMONORI, S. – KAZUTO, I. – OSAMU, I. – MIKA, M. (1994): A model for predicting the temporal distribution of one‐day recreational travel. Transportation Planning and Technology. 18(3). pp. 199–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081069408717544

TÖMÖRI M. (2018): A határokon átívelő kiskereskedelem társadalomföldrajza: Debrecen és Nagyvárad térsége. Debreceni Egyetemi Kiadó, Debrecen.

UNWTO (2018): Tourism Highlights 2017. UNWTO, Madrid.

VOLO, S. – GIAMBALVO, O. (2008): Tourism statistics: methodological imperatives and difficulties: The case of residential tourism in Island communities. Current Issues in Tourism. 11(4). pp. 369–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500802140398

WU, B. – WU, J. – SHI, X. – ZHANG, T. – DENG, C. – WU, S. (2019): Visiting probability model: a new method for tourist volume forecasting. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research. 24(12). pp. 1155–1168. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2019.1666153

WU, J. – BAO, H. (2002): Research on the spatial network model of tourism system. Scientia Geographica Sinica. 22(1). pp. 96–101.

WYNEN, J. (2013): Explaining travel distance during same-day visits. Tourism Management. 36(June). pp. 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.11.007

ZÁTORI, A. – MICHALKÓ, G. – T. NAGY, J. – KULCSÁR, N. – BALIZS, D. (2019): The tourist experience of domestic VFR travellers: the case of Hungary. Current Issues in Tourism. 22(12). pp. 1437–1459. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2017.1371117

Downloads

Published

2020-11-14

How to Cite

Michalkó, G., & Ilyés, N. (2020). Features of non-traditional touristic mobility in Hungary, especially in respect of a potential increase in tourismrelated revenue. Turizmus Bulletin, 20(Különszám), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.14267/TURBULL.2020v20n4.1

Issue

Section

Workshop