Tourism and quality of life in smart cities: A research study of Budapest
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14267/TURBULL.2025v25n4.2Keywords:
smart city, quality of life, resident perceptions, urban tourism, BudapestAbstract
This study examines tourism’s impact on quality of life (QoL) in smart cities, focusing on Budapest. While smart city QoL research often prioritizes transport, safety, and sustainability, tourism remains underexplored. This resident-focused study addresses that gap by analyzing how tourism affects perceptions of QoL, particularly regarding leisure, culture, and smart service use. Based on a representative questionnaire from all city districts, the study compares subjective attitudes within a broader QoL framework. Findings show that residents appreciate Budapest’s cultural and leisure offerings, though concerns persist over housing, healthcare, and education. Tourism is mostly viewed positively, especially for cultural assets and infrastructure, but negative views are noted in over-touristed areas like the “party quarter.” Smart services related to transport and e-ticketing are well received, though use is mainly utilitarian. While many support smart development, a gap may exist between intention and actual use. The study calls for urban strategies balancing tourism and resident wellbeing, highlighting the potential of smart tools to manage tourist flows and improve urban liveability.
References
AHMED, N. O. – El-HALAFAWY, A. M. – AMIN, A. M. (2019): A Critical Review of Urban Livability. European Journal of Sustainable Development. 8(1). pp. 165–182. Doi: 10.14207/ ejsd.2019.v8n1p165
CANTUARIAS-VILLESSUZANNE, C. – WEIGEL, R. – BLAIN, J. (2021): Clustering of European Smart Cities to Understand the Cities’ Sustainability Strategies. Sustainability. 13(2). 513. pp. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su13020513
CHANG, S. – SMITH, M. K. (2023): Residents’ Quality of Life in Smart Cities. Land. 12(4). 876. pp. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12040876
CHEN, Z., – CHAN, I. C. C. (2023): Smart cities and quality of life: A quantitative analysis of citizens’ support for smart city development. Information Technology & People. 36(1). pp. 263– 285. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-07-2021-0577
CORONEL PADILLA, M. F. – SMITH, M. K. (2023): Technology Acceptance and Readiness among different Generations of Urban Tourists. Marketing & Menedzsment. 57(1). pp. 37–48, https://doi.org/10.15170/MM.2023.57.01.04
CROES, R. – SHAPOVAL, V. – RIVERA, M. – B K, M. – ZIENTARA, P. (2024): Promoting residents’ happiness through a human centric approach to tourism city development. International Journal of Tourism Cities. 10(3). pp. 905–924, DOI 10.1108/IJTC-05-2023-0105.
CSAPÓ, J. – VÉGI, S. (2023): Seasonality Research in the Context of Smart Tourism – Evidence for an Empirical Research Gap. Modern Geográfia. 18(3). pp. 105–112. http://doi.org/10.15170/ MG.2023.18.03.07
CSUKÁS, M. – SZABÓ, R. (2021): The many faces of the smart city: Differing value propositions in the activity portfolios of nine cities. Cities. 112. 103116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cities.2021.103116
CSUKÁS, M. – SZABÓ, R. (2022): What are the conditions to become smart? A systematic analysis of the smart city strategy and smart city development activities of Budapest. Információs Társadalom. 22(2). pp. 9–26. https:// dx.doi.org/10.22503/inftars.XXII.2022.2.1
DEL REAL, C. – WARD, C. – SARTIPI, M. (2023): What do people want in a smart city? Exploring the stakeholders’ opinions, priorities and perceived barriers in a medium-sized city in the United States. International Journal of Urban Sciences. 27(1). pp. 50–74. https://doi.org/10.108 0/12265934.2021.1968939
DEL MAR MARTÍNEZ-BRAVO, M. – MARTÍNEZ Del-RÍO, J. – ANTOLÍN-LÓPEZ, R. (2019): Trade-Offs among Urban Sustainability, Pollution and Livability in European Cities. Journal of Cleaner Production. 224. pp. 651–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.110
FEKETE, K. A. (2023): Budapest Residents’ Views on Smart City Developments as Revealed by a Questionnaire Survey. Modern Geográfia. 18(2). pp. 17–33. https://doi.org/10.15170/ MG.2023.18.02.02
GIFFINGER, R. – GUDRUN, H. – GUDRUN – HAINDLMAIER, G. (2010): Smart Cities Ranking: An Effective Instrument For The Positioning Of The Cities. ACE: Architecture, City and Environment. 4(12). pp. 7–26. https:// doi.org/10.5821/ace.v4i12.2483
HAPP, É. – IVANCSÓ-HORVÁTH, Z. (2018): Digital tourism is the challenge of future – a new approach to tourism. Knowledge Horizons – Economics. 10(2). pp. 9–16.
JI, T. – CHEN, J. – WEI, H. – SU, Y. (2021): Towards people-centric smart city development: Investigating the citizens’ preferences and perceptions about smart-city services in Taiwan. Sustainable Cities and Society. 67. 102691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102691
KANG, L. – YANG, Z. – DANG, Y. – ZHANG, W. – Liu, C. (2022): Can Tourism Development Make Cities More Livable? Investigating 40 Cities in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19. 472. pp. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010472
LLOYD, K. – FULLAGAR, S. – REID, S. (2016): Where is the ‘Social’ in Constructions of ‘Liveability’? Exploring Community, Social Interaction and Social Cohesion in Changing Urban Environments. Urban Policy and Research. 34(4). pp. 343–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111 146.2015.1118374
NAMAZ, L. – TVERGYÁK, K. K. (2023): Uncovering deep place meanings in the context of urban wellbeing: The case study of Budapest. City and Environment Interactions. 17. 100095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cacint.2022.100095
OH, J. (2020): Smart City as a Tool of Citizen Oriented Urban Regeneration: Framework of Preliminary Evaluation and Its Application. Sustainability. 12(17). 6874. pp. 1–20. https://doi. org/10.3390/su12176874
ORTEGA, J. – MALCOLM, C. (2020): Touristic Stakeholders’ Perceptions about the Smart Tourism Destination Concept in Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco, Mexico. Sustainability. 12(5). 1741. pp. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051741
ORTEGA-FERNÁNDEZ, A. – MARTÍN-ROJAS, R. – GARCÍA-MORALES, V. J. (2020): Artificial Intelligence in the Urban Environment: Smart Cities as Models for Developing Innovation and Sustainability. Sustainability. 12(19). 7860. pp. 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12197860
OZKAYA, G. – ERDIN, C. (2020): Evaluation of smart and sustainable cities through a hybrid MCDM approach based on ANP and TOPSIS technique. Heliyon. 6. 05052. pp. 1–22. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05052
PAIVA, D. (2023): The paradox of atmosphere: Tourism, heritage, and urban liveability. Annals of Tourism Research. 101(July). pp. 1–10. 103600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2023.103600
PÉREZ GARRIDO, B. – SEBREK, S. S. – SEMENOVA, V. – BAL, D. – MICHALKÓ, G. (2022): Addressing the Phenomenon of Overtourism in Budapest from Multiple Angles Using Unconventional Methodologies and Data. Sustainability. 14(4). 2268. pp. 1–19. https:// doi.org/10.3390/su14042268
PERNEGER, T. V. – COURVOISIER, D. S. – HUDELSON, P. M. – GAYET-AGERON, A. (2015): Sample size for pre-tests of questionnaires. Quality of Life Research. 24(1). pp. 147–51. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0752-2
SHAMI, M.R. – RAD, V.B. – MOINIFAR, M. (2022): The structural model of indicators for evaluating the quality of urban smart living. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 176. (March). 121427. pp. 1–11. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121427
SHEIKH, W. T. – Van AMEIJDE, J. (2022): Promoting livability through urban planning: A comprehensive framework based on the “theory of human needs”. Cities. 131(December). pp. 1–18. 103972.
SMITH, M. K. – CHANG, S. – MICHALKÓ, G. (2024): Smart Living and Quality of Life: Domains and Indicators. Journal of Urban and Regional Analysis. 16(2). pp. 159–190. https://doi. org/10.37043/JURA.2024.16.2.1
SMITH, M. K. – PINKE SZIVA, I. – OLT, G. (2019): Overtourism and Resident Resistance in Budapest. Tourism Planning and Development. 16(4). pp. 376– 392. doi:10.1080/21568316.2019.1595705
SMITH, M. K. – PINKE-SZIVA, I. – BEREZVAI, Z. (2023): The relative importance of culture in urban tourism: implications for segmentation. Consumer Behavior in Tourism and Hospitality. 18(2). pp. 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1108/ CBTH-01-2022-0026
SMITH, M. K. – PINKE-SZIVA, I. – PUCZKÓ, L. (2024): Urban green spaces and resident wellbe ing: Foundations of sustainable city tourism. In: Maxim, C. – Morrison, A. M. – Day, J. – Coca Stefaniak, J. A. (eds.): Handbook on Sustainable Urban Tourism. Edward Elgar. pp. 133–145. htt ps://doi.org/10.4337/9781803926742.00018
TANG, J. – CAI, C. – LIU, Y. – Sun, J. (2022): Can Tourism Development Help Improve Urban Liveability? An Examination of the Chinese Case. Sustainability. 14. 11427. pp. 1–27. https:// doi.org/10.3390/su141811427
TENNAKOON, T. M. M. P. – KULATUNGA, U. (2019): Understanding liveability: Related concepts and definitions. In: Sandanayake, Y.G. – Gunatilake, S. – Waidyasekara, A. (eds): Proceedings of the 8th World Construction Symposium. Colombo, Sri Lanka. pp. 578–587.
UYSAL, M. – BERBEKOVA, A. – WANG, J. (2025): Quality-of-life: A critical examination of research progress. Tourism Management. 107. 105070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2024.105070.
WANG, M. – ZHOU, T. (2023): Does smart city implementation improve the subjective quality of life? Evidence from China. Technology in Society. 72. 102161. pp. 1–13. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102161
ZHANG, X. – REN, X. (2024): Design Dilemma between Urban Tourism and Quality of Life: Assessment of Livability Barriers in Different Contexts. Sustainability. 16. 4897. pp. 1–31. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16124897
ZHU, H. – SHEN, L. – REN, Y. (2022): How can smart city shape a happier life? The mechanism for developing a Happiness Driven Smart City. Sustainable Cities and Society. 80(May). pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103791
Online sources
BERENDE, P. (June 17, 2015): “6 handy mobile apps to help you navigate Budapest”. We Love Budapest. https://welovebudapest.com/ en/toplist/6-handy-mobile-apps-to-help-you navigate-budapest (May 6, 2023)
CENSUS (2022): Hungary, https:// nepszamlalas2022.ksh.hu/en (April 9, 2025)
CSÉCSEI, N. (2020): Smart City Index 2020: Budapest among the most underdeveloped cities in the region. https://dailynewshungary.com/smart-city-in dex-2020-budapest -among-the-most-underde veloped-cities-in-the-region (May 5, 2020)
ECONOMIST INTELLIGENCE UNIT (2024): The Global Liveability Index 2024. https://www.eiu. com/n/campaigns/global-liveability-index-2024 (April 9, 2025)
EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2023): Report on the Quality of Life in European Cities. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/informa tion-sources/maps/quality-of-life_en (April 9, 2025)
HCSO (2022): https://nepszamlalas2022.ksh.hu/ en/database (October 26, 2023)
HCSO (2023): Foreign citizens residing in Hungary by country of citizenship and sex. https://www.ksh. hu/stadat_files/nep/en/nep0023.html (October 26, 2023)
MUNICIPALITY OF BUDAPEST (2017): Smart Budapest: The Smart City Vision of Budapest. www.budapest2024.org (April 9, 2025)
OECD Better Life Index (2019): Hungary. https:// www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/countries/ hungary (April 9, 2025)
SMART LYNX (2021): 5th District of Budapest, 14 April. https://smartlynx.hu/en/5th-district-of budapest (April 9, 2025
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
