The EU Customs Tariff Framework and the Special Case of Culture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35551/PFQ_2026_3_5Kulcsszavak:
customs union, customs nomenclature, uniform application of customs law, tariff classification, cultural property, Nordic region, F13, F14, F15, K33, K34, O52Absztrakt
This study explores how the formally objective classification system of the European Union’s Combined Nomenclature (CN) is applied in practice to products with cultural significance. To illustrate this, it examines the customs tariff classification debate surrounding the Tomte gnome figure, an iconic element of Swedish and Nordic Christmas folklore. The hypothesis posited that while the harmonized customs tariff is designed to exclude any subjective factors, cultural context at the national implementation level may still lead to divergent classification outcomes. The research combined legal and empirical methods: the relevant legal framework was reviewed, and national classification practices related to the Tomte figure (including Binding Tariff Information rulings) were analyzed, alongside the EU’s harmonization measures. The findings indicate that in the Tomte case the same figure was classified differently across member states: some countries treated it as a Christmas article, others as a decoration or toy, resulting in different tariff codes and import duties. This demonstrates that cultural context can influence ostensibly objective classification decisions. At the same time, EU-level harmonization tools (Commission-issued binding classification decisions, and annual CN updates) strive to unify these divergent practices. The research confirms the hypothesis, showing that despite an ostensibly objective framework, national cultural factors can indeed influence customs classification.
Hivatkozások
Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statis-tical nomenclature and the Common Customs Tariff (Official Journal of the European Communities, L 256, 7 September 1987, p. 1) . ↩ ↩
Bakai, K. P., Suba, L., & Szabó, A. (2022). First-year experience of the abolition of the €22 rule and the introduction of the new e-commerce VAT laws. Public Fi-nance Quarterly, 67(4), 585–600.
World Customs Organization. (2012). General rules for the interpretation of the Harmonised System
Hartkamp, A. S. (2011). The General Principles of EU Law and Private Law. Rabels Zeitschrift Für Ausländisches Und Internationales Privatrecht / The Rabel Journal of Comparative and International Private Law, 75(2), 241–259. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41151496
Widdowson, David. (2007). The Changing Role of Customs: Evolution or Re-volution?. World Customs Journal. 1. https://doi.org/10.55596/001c.90938
Valantiejus, G., & Katuoka, S. (2019). Uniformity of application of EU cus-toms law: Problematic aspects in the Baltic States. Economics and Culture, 16(2), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.2478/jec-2019-0019
Knill, C. (1998). European policies: The impact of national administrative traditions. Journal of Public Policy, 18(1), 1–28
Folsom, R. H. (2018). Principles of international trade law: including the World Trade Organisation, technology transfers, and import/export/customs law (Se-cond edition). West Academic Publishing.
Lasiński-Sulecki, K. (2022). Is soft law making hard law too hard? The impact of WCO explanatory notes on EU customs classification. Global Trade and Customs Journal, 17(4), 152–167.
Brigstock, P. (2024). Tariff classification divergence in the EU: An analysis of BTI decisions and Member State practice (Doctoral thesis, University of Amsterdam).
Weerth, Carsten. (2008). Basic Principles of Customs Classifications under the Harmonised System. Global Trade and Customs Journal 3 (2), 61–67.
European Union. (2013). Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parli-ament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code (recast). Official Journal of the European Union, L 269, 1–101
World Customs Organization. (2025). Amendments to the Harmonised Sys-tem Explanatory Notes – 75th Session of the HS Committee (March 2025)(applicable from 1 June 2025)
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1926 of 22 September 2025 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (2025).
O’Connor, A., & Wolf-Knuts, U. (2000). Arv. Nordic Yearbook of Folklore. Béa-loideas, 68, 209. https://doi.org/10.2307/20522569
Stockholm. (1960). Swedish Act on Copyright in Literary and Artistic Works. Royal Act Regulating Book Printers
U.S. Customs and Border Protection. (12 July 2021). NY N320278: The tariff classification of a Christmas decoration and other articles from China.
Faone, C. (2024). Do harmonised provisions ensure fairness in international trade? The European customs law experience. Athens Journal of Law, 10(3), 399–418. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajl.10-3-9
Copenhagen Economics. (2021). Analysis of aspects of uniform tariff clas-sification: Study on BTI divergence in EU Member States (Report commissi-oned by the European Commission).
Szabados, T. (2022). A paradigm shift in EU cultural property legislation?Central European Yearbook of Law and Policy, 6(1), 45–71.
Merryman, J. H. (1986). Two Ways of Thinking About Cultural Proper-ty. The American Journal of International Law, 80(4), 831–853. https://doi. org/10.2307/2202065
Letöltések
Megjelent
Folyóirat szám
Rovat
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pénzügyi Szemle

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors assign copyright to Pénzügyi Szemle / Public Finance Quarterly. Authors are responsible for permission to reproduce copyright material from other sources.










