The interpretation and role of utility from early economic views to behavioral economics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35551/PFQ_2025_3_1Keywords:
utility, utility function, history of theory, economic thinking, B10, B21Abstract
This study examines the historical development of the concept of utility from early 18th-century economic views to behavioral economics. It critically evaluates and analyzes how the interpretation and role of utility has changed with the development of economics–from the normative foundations of utilitarianism, through the theory of marginal utility and the model of rational choice, to the formalized framework of expected utility maximization. The study pays particular attention to how behavioral economics has challenged the assumptions of neoclassical economics regarding rationality and expected utility. Finally it also discusses, how empirical research findings on decisions and behaviors in real-world settings have contributed to the enrichment of the concept of utility and utility functions.
References
Akay, A.–Bargain, O. B.–Jara, H. X. (2023): Experienced versus decision utility: large-scale comparison for income–leisure preferences. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 125(4): 823–859. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12538
Akerlof, G. A. (1997): Social distance and social decisions. Econometrica, 65(5): 1005–1027. https://doi.org/10.2307/2171877
Allen, R. G. D. (1932): The foundations of a mathematical theory of exchange. Economica, 12(35): 197–220. https://doi.org/10.2307/2549268
Allen, R. G. D. (1938): Mathematical analysis for economists. London: Macmillan.
Andersson, F. W. (2008): Is concern for relative consumption a function of relative consumption? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(1): 353–364. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.socec.2007.03.008
Antinyan, A.–Horváth, G.–Jia, M. (2020): Curbing the consumption of positional goods: Behavioral interventions versus taxation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 179: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.08.018
Ariely, D. (2008): Predictably irrational. New York: Harper Collins.
Armesilla, S. (2013): Five key criticisms about the theory of marginal utility. Madrid: Complutense University of Madrid.
Barigozzi, F.–Levaggi, R. (2010): Emotional decision-makers and anomalous attitudes towards information. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 40: 255–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-010-9092-y
Bentham, J. (1789/1948) An introduction to the principle of morals and legislations. Reprinted (Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1948).
Bernardelli, H. (1938): The end of the marginal utility theory? Economica, New Series, 5(18): 192–212. https://doi.org/10.2307/2549021
Bernoulli, D. (1954): Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk. Econometrica, 22(1): 23–36. (Translation of Bernoulli, D. (1738): Specimen theoriae novae de mensura sortis; Papers Imp. Acad. Sci. St. Petersburg 5: 175–192.)
Black, C. R. D. (1991): “Utility” in the New Palgrave: A dictionary of economics. Vol 4. 776–778.
Bodner, R.–Prelec, D. (2002): Self-signaling and diagnostic utility in everyday decision making. In: Brocas, I.–Carillo, J. (szerk.): Collected Essays in Psychology and Economics. Oxford University Press. www.ecare.ulb.ac.be/ecare/Juan/book. htm
Bradford, W. D.–Dolan, P.–Galizzi, M. M. (2019): Looking ahead: Subjective time perception and individual discounting. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 58: 43–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-019-09298-1
Brekke, K. A.–Howarth, R. B.–Nyborg, K. (2003): Status-seeking and material affluence: Evaluating the Hirsch hypothesis. Ecological Economics, 45(1): 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-8009(02)00262-8
Bruni, L. (2010): Pareto’s legacy in modern economics. The case of psychology. European Journal of Social Sciences (Revue européenne des sciences sociales), 48(146): 93–111. https://doi.org/10.4000/ress.759
Camerer, C. (1999): Behavioral economics: Reunifying psychology and economics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96(19): 10575–10577. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.19.10575
Collins Dictionary of Economics (1988): London and Glasgow: Collins.
Congleton, R. D. (1989): Efficient status seeking: Externalities, and the evolution of status games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 11(2): 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(89)90012-7
Cramer, C. (1728): Letter to Nicolas Bernoulli, a cousin of Daniel (Bernoulli). 21 May, 1728. (In Daniel Bernoulli, 1738)
Crimmins, J. (2021): Jeremy Bentham. In: The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Stanford University.
DellaVigna, S. (2009): Psychology and economics: Evidence from the field. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2): 315–372. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.2.315
Diener, E.–Emmons, R. A.–Larsen, R. J.–Griffin, S. (1985): Development of the satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1): 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
Downey, E. H. (1910): The futility of marginal utility. Journal of Political Economy, 18(4): 253–268.
Duesenberry, J. (1949): Income, saving and the theory of consumer behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Eabrasu, M. (2011): A praxeological assessment of subjective value. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 14(2): 216–241.
Edgeworth, F. Y. (1881): Mathematical psychics: An essay on the application of mathematics to the moral sciences. London: C. Kegan Paul & Co.
Elahi, K.–Reardon, J. (2022): Jevons’ marginal utility theory is contestable?Discussion Paper. ResearchGate.
Encyclopedia Britannica (2008): Marginal utility.
Falk, A.–Fischbacher, U. (2006): A theory of reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior, 54(2): 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2005.03.001
Fechner, G. T. (1860): Elemente der Psychophysik. Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel.
Fehr, E.–Schmidt, K. M. (1999): A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3): 817–868. https://doi. org/10.1162/003355399556151
Fetter, F. A. (1915): Economic Principles. New York: The Century Company.
Figini, P.–Leoni, V.–Vici, L. (2024): And suddenly, the rain! When surprises shape experienced utility. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 224: 771–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2024.06.026
Fisher, I. (1903): The nature of capital and income. New York: Macmillan.
Frank, R. H. (1985): The demand for unobservable and other nonpositional goods. American Economic Review, 75(1): 101–116. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1812706
Frederick, S.–Loewenstein, G.–O’Donoghue, T. (2002): Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2): 351–401. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.40.2.351
Frey, B. S.–Benz, M.–Stutzer, A. (2004): Introducing procedural utility: Not only what, but also how matters. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE)/Zeitschrift für diegesamte Staatswissenschaft, 160(3): 377–401. https://doi. org/10.1628/0932456041960560
Frey, B. S.–Stutzer, A. (2005): Beyond outcomes: measuring procedural utility. Oxford Economic Papers, 57(1): 90–111. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpi002
Godovykh, M.–Tasci, A. D. A. (2020): Satisfaction vs experienced utility: Current issues and opportunities. Current Issues in Tourism, 23(18): 2273–2282. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2020.1769573
Hardisty, D. J.–Appelt, K. C.–Weber, E. U. (2013): Good or bad, we want it now: Fixed-cost present bias for gains and losses explains magnitude asymmetries in intertemporal choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26(4): 348–361. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1771
Hicks, J. R. (1946): The theory of wages. (2nd ed.) London: Macmillan.
Hicks, J. R.–Allen, R. G. D. (1934): A reconsideration of the theory of value. Part I. Economica, New Series, 1(1): 52–76.
Hori, H. (2009): Nonpaternalistic altruism and functional interdependence of social preferences. Social Choice and Welfare, 32(1): 59–77. https://doi. org/10.1007/s00355-008-0310-3
Hou, L.–Hsueh, S-C.–Zhang, S. (2021): Digital payments and households’ consumption: A mental accounting interpretation. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 57(7): 2079–2093. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2021.1887727
Investopedia (2008): Utility.
Jaffé, W. (1977): The birth of Léon Walras’s Éléments. In: William Jaffé’s essays on Walras. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jevons, S. W. (1871): The theory of political economy. London: Macmillan.
Jevons, W. S. (1879): The theory of political economy (2nd ed., rev. & enl.). London: Macmillan.
Kahneman, D.–Tversky, A. (1979): Prospect Theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2): 263–292. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
Kahneman, D.–Wakker, P. P.–Sarin, R. (1997): Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2): 375–406. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355397555235
Kahneman, D. (2000): Experienced utility and objective happiness: A moment-based approach. In: Kahneman, D.–Tversky, A. (szerk.): Choices, values, and frames. New York: Cambridge University Press and the Russell Sage Foundation, Ch 37, 673–692.
Kahneman, D.–Krueger, A. B.–Schkade, D.–Schwarz, N.–Stone, A. (2004a): A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science, 306(5702): 1776–1780. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1103572
Kahneman, D.–Krueger, A. B.–Schkade, D.–Schwarz, N.–Stone, A. (2004b): Toward national well-being accounts. American Economic Review, 94(2): 429–434. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828041301713
Kahneman, D.–Sugden, R. (2005): Experienced utility as a standard of policy evaluation. Environmental & Resource Economics, 32: 161–181. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10640-005-6032-4
Kahneman, D.–Thaler, R. H. (2006): Anomalies: Utility maximization and experienced utility. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1): 221–234. https://doi. org/10.1257/089533006776526076
Keller, R. (2015): The problem with the concept of utility and its measurement. Polish Journal of Political Science, 1(4): 6–44.
Kleine, J. – Peschke, T. – Wagner, N. (2024): Beyond financial wealth: The experienced utility of collectibles. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 97: 101865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2024.101865
Kovács, K. (2020): Relative consumption with multiple reference points under uncertainty. Economics and Sociology, 13(4): 61–80. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2020/13-4/4
Laibson, D. (1997): Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2): 443–447. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355397555253
Lemieux, P. (2022): Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility. www.econlib.org/interpersonal-comparisons-of-utility
Loewenstein, G.–Prelec, D. (1992): Anomalies in intertemporal choice: Evidence and an interpretation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2): 573–597. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118482
Loewenstein, G.–Elster, J. (1992): Utility from memory and anticipation. In: Loewenstein, G.–Elster, J. (szerk.): Choice over time. Russel Sage Foundation, 213–234.
Loewenstein, G.–O’Donoghue, T.–Rabin, M. (2003): Projection bias in predicting future utility. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4): 1209–1248. https://doi. org/10.1162/003355303322552784
Malmendier, U.–te Velde, V. L.–Weber, R. A. (2014): Rethinking reciprocity. Annual Review of Economics, 6: 849–874. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080213-041312
Matousek, J.–Havranek, T.–Irsova, Z. (2022): Individual discount rates: A meta-analysis of experimental evidence. Experimental Economics, 25: 318–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-021-09716-9
McCulloch, J. H. (1977): The Austrian theory of marginal use and of ordinal marginal utility. Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, 37(3-4): 249–280. https://doi. org/10.1007/bf01291374
Menger, C. (1871): Grundsätze der Volkswirtschaftslehre (Principles of Economics). Wien: Wilhelm Braumüller.
Morewedge, C. K. (2015): Utility: Anticipated, experienced, and remembered. In: Keren, G.–Wu, G. (szerk.): Wiley-Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making. John Wiley & Sons: 295–330.
Moscati, I. (2013): How cardinal utility entered economic analysis, 1909–1944. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 20(6): 906–939. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2013.825001
Moscati, I. (2020): History of utility theory. BAFFI CAREFIN Centre Research Paper No. 2020-129. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3530949 or http://dx.doi. org/10.2139/ssrn.3530949
Moscati, I. (2023): The history and methodology of expected utility. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009198295
O’Donoghue, T.–Rabin, M. (1999): Do it now or later. American Economic Review, 89(1): 103–124. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.1.103
Pareto, V. (1893): Considerazioni sui principi fondamentali dell’economia politica pura. Firenze: G. Barbèra.
Pareto, V. (1900): Sunto di alcuni capitoli di un nuovo trattato di economia pura del Prof. Pareto. Giornale degli Economisti, 20 (Serie 2, Vol. X), Marzo: 216–235 és 511–549.
Pareto, V. (1906): Manual of political economy. New York: Kelley.
The Penguin Dictionary of Economics (1992): London: Penguin.
Phelps, E. S.–Pollak, R. A. (1968): On second-best national saving and game-equilibrium growth. Review of Economic Studies, 35(2): 185–199. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296547
Read, D. (2001): Is time-discounting hyperbolic or subadditive? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 23(1): 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011198414683
Read, D. (2007): Experienced utility: Utility theory from Jeremy Bentham to Daniel Kahneman. Thinking & Reasoning, 13(1): 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 13546780600872627
Robbins, L. (1932): An essay on the nature and significance of economic science. London: Macmillan.
Samuelson, P. (1937): A note on measurement of utility. The Review of Economic Studies, 4(2): 155–161. https://doi.org/10.2307/2967612
Samuelson, P. A. (1938): The empirical implications of utility analysis. Econometrica, 6(4): 344–356. https://doi.org/10.2307/1905411
Samuelson, P. A. (1950): The problem of integrability in utility theory. Economica, New Series, 17(68): 355–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2549499
Samuelson, P.–Nordhaus, W. D. (2010): Economics. (19th ed.) New York: McGrow-Hill/Irwin.
Sent, E-M. (2004): Behavioral economics: How psychology made its (limited) way back into economics. History of Political Economy, 36(4): 735–760. https://doi. org/10.1215/00182702-36-4-735
Simon, H. A. (1955): A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1): 99–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852
Simon, H. A. (1957a): Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization. (2nd ed.) New York: Macmillan.
Simon, H. A. (1957b): Models of man. New York: John Wiley.
Simon, H. A. (1982): Models of bounded rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Simon, H. A. (1986): Rationality in psychology and economics. Journal of Business, 59(4): S209–S224. https://doi.org/10.1086/296363
Simon, H. A. (1997): An empirically based microeconomics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Simon, J. (2016): On the existence of altruistic value and utility functions. Theory and Decision, 81(3): 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-016-9537-0
Smith, A. (1776): An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell.
Stigler, G. (1950): The development of utility theory. Part I. Journal of Political Economy, 58(4): 307–327.
Thaler, R. H. (1981): Some empirical evidence of dynamic inconsistency. Economics Letters, 8(3): 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(81)90067-7
Thaler, R. (1985): Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4(3): 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.4.3.199
Tversky, A.–Kahneman, D. (1974): Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157): 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
Tversky, A.–Kahneman, D. (1991): Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4): 1039–1061. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937956
Tversky, A.–Kahneman, D. (1992): Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4): 297–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00122574
Urbany, J. E.–Bearden, W. O.–Kaicker, A.–Smith-de Borrero, M. (1997): Transaction utility effects when quality is uncertain. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25:45–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02894508
Veblen, T. (1898): Why is economics not an evolutionary science? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 12(4): 373–397.
Veblen, T. (1909): The limitations of marginal utility. The Journal of Political Economy, 17(9): 620–636. https://doi.org/10.1086/251614
Viner, J. (1925): The utility concept in value theory and its critics. Journal of Political Economy, 33(6): 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1086/253725
Viner, J. (1958): The long view and the short: Studies in economic theory and practice. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
Von Neumann, J.–Morgenstern, O. (1944): Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Walras, L. (1874): Éléments d’économie politique pure; ou, Théorie de la richesse sociale. Lausanne: Corbaz.
Wang, F.–Menon, K.–Ranaweera, C. (2018): Dynamic trends in online product ratings: A diagnostic utility explanation. Journal of Business Research, 87: 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.02.015
Weber, M. (1908): Die protestantische Ethik und der ‚Geist’ des Kapitalismus. In: Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, 26: 1–54.
Wieser, F. von (1884): Über den Ursprung und die Hauptgesetze des wirthschaftlichen Werthes. Wien: Alfred Hölder.
Wilkinson, N.–Klaes, M. (2012): An introduction to behavioral economics. (2nd ed.) Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave Macmillen.
World Happiness Report (2025): https://worldhappiness.report/
Wundt, W. (1874): Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann.
Zafirovski, M. (2001): Max Weber’s analysis of marginal utility theory and psychology revisited: Latent propositions in economic sociology and the sociology of economics. History of Political Economy, 33(3): 437–458.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Public Finance Quarterly
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors assign copyright to Pénzügyi Szemle / Public Finance Quarterly. Authors are responsible for permission to reproduce copyright material from other sources.
