Lessons Learned from an Operational Smart Grid Through the Example of a Local Government in Hungary

Authors

  • Noémi Piricz Óbuda University
  • Balázs Révész University of Szeged

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35551/PFQ_2022_3_5

Keywords:

Smart Grid, Management of Technological Innovation and R&D, Technological Change: Choices and Consequences, Alternative Energy Sources, O32, O33, Q42

Abstract

The steadily growing global demand for electricity, sustainability expectations, the global Covid epidemic and the Russian-Ukrainian war are also affecting the electricity supply chain. In our study we will focus on the smart grid, the modern smart electricity network of the near future, from a Hungarian perspective, with management approach. Hungary’s newest and most complex smart grid is analysed using the case study method. We investigated the actors of the smart grid and were interested in how the cooperation between the parties was, what learning processes they experienced, and what risks they saw and see now. Our results show that customers and contractors are mutually satisfied; in addition to the numerical benefits, each party also values the learning processes in different areas. The risks identified stem from modern technology, complexity, novel solutions and operational mechanisms, but geopolitical, global economic uncertainties and shortages also have an impact.

References

Amin, S. M., Giacomoni, A. M. (2012). Smart grid, safe grid. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, 10(1), pp. 33–40, https://doi.org/10.1109/MPE.2011.943112

Bajor, P. (2007). The bullwhip-effect in the electricity supply. In Proceedings Papers of Business Sciences: Symposium for Young Researchers (FIKUSZ), pp. 19–25

Cantu, C., Corsaro, D., Fiocca, R., Tunisini, A. (2013). IMP studies: A bridge between tradition and innovation, Industrial Marketing Management Vol. 42, pp. 1007–1016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.07.021

Corsaro, D., Cantu, C., Tunisini, A. (2012). Actors’ Heterogeneity in Innovation Networks, Industrial Marketing Management Vol. 41, pp. 780–789, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2012.06.005

Czeczeli V., Kolozsi P. P., Kutasi G., Marton A. (2020). Gazdasagi kitettseg es valsagallosag exogen sokk eseten – A Covid–19-jarvany rovid tavu gazdasagi hatasa az EU-ban. Penzugyi Szemle 2020/3. 323–349. oldal, https://doi.org/10.35551/PSZ_2020_3_1

Csizmadia, Z. (2004). Az innovacio halozati alapu megkozelitese: Tudasaramlas, innovacios rendszerek, regionalis halozatok. Elmeleti es metodologiai iranyvonalak, nemzetkozi es hazai tapasztalatok. Online: http://www.socialnetwork.hu/cikkek/CsizmadiaZoltanInnovacioMunkakozi1.pdf

Denzin, N. K. (1978). The logic of naturalistic inquiry. In N. K. Denzin (Ed.), Sociological methods: A sourcebook. New York: McGraw-Hill, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315129945

Halmai, P. (2021). Kozeppontban a reziliencia. A Gazdasagi es Monetaris Unio melyulesenek egyes mechanizmusai. Penzugyi Szemle 2021/1. 7–31. oldal, https://doi.org/10.35551/PSZ_2021_1_1

Hakansson, H., Snehota, I. (1995). (ed.). Developing relationships in business networks, London, Routledge

Hoeven, E. (2021). Top PG&E regulator resigns. Online: https://www.turn.org/in-the-news/california-public-utilities-president-stepping-downat-the-end-of-the-year/

Lauckner, H., Paterson, M., Krupa, T. (2012). Using Constructivist Case Study Methodology to Understand Community Development Processes: Proposed Methodological Questions to Guide the Research Process. The Qualitative Report, 17 (13), pp. 1–22, https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2012.1790

Ma, Z., Alla Asmussen, Bo Norregaard Jorgensen (2018). Industrial Consumers’ Smart Grid Adoption: Influential Factors and Participation Phases. Energies, 11, 182, https://doi.org/10.3390/en11010182

Mandjak, T., Szalkai, Zs., Hledik, E., Neumann-Bodi, E., Magyar, M., Simon, J. (2021). The knowledge interconnection process: evidence from contract manufacturing relationships, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Vol. 36/9, pp. 1570–1584, https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-01-2020-0052

Mangan, J., C. Lalwani, T. Butcher (2008). Global Logistics and Supply Chain Management. Wiley

Miles, M., Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. An expanded source-book. Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Piricz N. (2020). Management Challenges of Smart Grids, In: Golinska-Dawson, P., D. Dujak, A. Kolinski (szerk.) Integration of Information Flow for Greening Supply Chain Management, Springer International Publishing, pp. 393–415

Piricz N. (2021). Colaboration in a working smart grid – a case study from Hungary. 21st International Scientific Conference – Business Logistics in Modern Management, Eszek, Horvatorszag, pp. 295–309

Pyka, A. (2002). Innovation Networks in Economics From the Incentive-based to the Knowledge-based Approaches, European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 5/3, pp. 152–163, https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060210436727

Ramkumar, S., Mueller, M., Pyka, A., Squazzoni, F. (2022). Diffusion of eco-innovation through inter-firm network targeting: An agentbased model, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 335, pp. 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130298

Szegedi Z., Prezenszki J., (2017). Logisztikamenedzsment. Kossuth Kiado

Szokolszky A. (2004). Kutatomunka a pszichologiaban. Osiris Kiado

Verbong, G. P. J., Sjouke Beemsterboer, F. Sengers (2013). Smart grids or smart users? Involving users in developing a low carbon electricity economy. Energy Policy 52, pp. 117–125, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.003

Weiss, J. A., Dale, B. C. (1998). Diffusing Against Mature Technology: Issues and Strategy, Industrial Marketing Management Vol. 27, pp. 293–304, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(97)00062-X

Yeung, H. W. (1995). Qualitative Personal Interviews in International Business Research: Some Lessons from a Study of Hong Kong Transnational Corporations. International Business Review Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 313–339

Yin, R. K., (2018). Case Study Research and Applications – Design and Methods. COSMOS Corporation, 6th Edition

MNB (2019). Versenykepessegi program 330 pontban, Online: https://www.mnb.hu/kiadvanyok/jelentesek/versenykepessegi-program-330-pontban

Published

2022-09-30

How to Cite

Piricz, N., & Révész, B. (2022). Lessons Learned from an Operational Smart Grid Through the Example of a Local Government in Hungary. Public Finance Quarterly, 67(3). https://doi.org/10.35551/PFQ_2022_3_5

Issue

Section

Focus - Sustainability, Energy, Security of Supply