A lekapcsolódás Szent Gráljának illúziója – Léteznek-e országok viszonylag magas SDGI-vel és alacsony ökológiai lábnyommal?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14267/kov.2024e3Kulcsszavak:
ökológiai lábnyom, fenntarthatóság, ökológiai hatás, SDGIAbsztrakt
Az országok fenntarthatósági teljesítményét mérő mutatószámok szükségessége a GDP-nek a jólét, a fenntarthatóság és az ellenálló képesség mérőszámaként való felhasználási korlátai miatt merült fel. A kutatók az elmúlt évtizedekben különféle indikátorokat és rangsorokat készítettek, amelyek a pusztán gazdasági növekedésről egy átfogóbb perspektívára helyezték át a hangsúlyt. Kutatásunk célja egy új rangsor létrehozása volt, amely két módszertan, nevezetesen az ENSZ Fenntartható Fejlődési Célok Index (SDGI) és a Global Footprint Network ökológiai lábnyoma (EF) integrációján alapul, annak érdekében, hogy ország- klasztereket lehessen azonosítani. Az országok csoportosítására hierarchikus klaszterezést, a kiugró értékek kiszűrésére a ‘legközelebbi szomszéd’ módszert, a végső klaszterekre pedig a Ward módszert használtuk. Ezenkívül a Pearson-féle korrelációs együtthatót kiszámítottuk a 17 SDGI és az EF közötti kapcsolat értékelésére. A klaszterezés eredményei azt mutatták, hogy a háromklaszteres megoldás kielégítőnek tekinthető. Az új módszerrel kapott eredmények alapján az SDGI környezeti dimenziója a környezeti fenntarthatóság szempontjából az országok rangsorolásának elégséges mérőszáma.
Hivatkozások
Bhanojirao, V. V. (1991): Human development Report 1990: Review and assessment; World Dev 19 (10), 1451–1460.
Blomqvist, L.–Brook, B. W.–Ellis, E. C.–Kareiva, P. M.–Nordhaus, T.–Shellenberger, M. (2013): Does the Shoe Fit? Real versus Imagined Ecological Footprints; PLoS Biol 11(11), e1001700
Bondarchik, J.–Jabłońska-Sabuka, M.–Linnanen, L.–Kauranne, T. (2016): Improving the objectivity of sustainability indices by a novel approach for combining contrasting effects: Happy Planet Index revisited; Ecol Indic 69, 400–406.
Bradley Guy, G.–Kibert, C. J. (1998): Developing indicators of sustainability: US experience; Build Res Inf. 26 (1), 39–45.
Brulé, G. (2022): Evaluation of Existing Indexes of Sustainable Well-Being and Propositions for Improvement; Sustainability 14 (2),1027
Brundtland, G. H.–Khalid, M.–Agnelli, S.–Al-Athel, S.–Chidzero, B. (1987): Our common future; United Nations Publications, New York
Campus, A.–Porcu, M. (2010): Reconsidering the well-being: the Happy Planet Index and the issue of missing data; Contributi di Ricerca CRENoS. Working Papers 2010/07
Choon, H.-W.–Yong, C.-C.–Tan, S.-K.–Tan, S.-H. (2022): A proposed integrated happiness framework to achieve sustainable development; Heliyon 8 (10), e10813
Custodio, H. M.–Hadjikakou, M.–Bryan, B. A. (2023): A review of socioeconomic indicators of sustainability and wellbeing building on the social foundations framework; Ecol Econ 203, 107608
Dahl, A. L. (2007): Integrated assessment and indicators; in. Tomás, H., Moldan, B., Dahl, A. L. (szerk.): Sustainability Indicators – A Scientific Assessment; Island Press, Washington, 163–176.
Daly, H. E. (2014): From uneconomic growth to a steady-state economy; Edward Elgar Cheltenham, UK
Dasgupta, P.–Weale, M. (1992): On Measuring the Quality of Life; World Dev 20 (1), 119–131.
Diaz-Sarachaga, J. M.–Jato-Espino, D.–Castro-Fresno, D. (2018): Is the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) index an adequate framework to measure the progress of the 2030 Agenda? Sustain Dev 26, 663–671.
do Carvalhal Monteiro, R. L.–Pereira, V.–Costa, H. G. (2019): Analysis of the Better Life Index Trough a Cluster Algorithm; Soc Indic Res 142, 477–506.
EIU – Economist Intelligence Unit (2024): Democracy Index 2023 – Age of conflict; EIU, London
Ewing, B., Moore, D.–Goldfinger, S.–Oursler, A.–Reed, A.–Wackernagel, M. (2010): The Ecological Footprint Atlas; Global Footprint Network, Oakland
Gallego-Álvarez, I.–Galindo-Villardón, M. P.–Rodríguez-Rosa, M. (2015): Analysis of the Sustainable Society Index Worldwide: A Study from the Biplot Perspective; Soc Indic Res 120 (1), 29–65.
Gao, P.–Wang, Y.–Wang, H.–Song, C.–Ye, S.–Wang, X. (2023): A Pareto frontbased approach for constructing composite index of sustainability without weights: A comparative study of implementations; Ecol Ind 155, 110919
Giampietro, M.–Saltelli, A. (2014): Footprints to nowhere; Ecol Indic 46, 610–621.
Giannetti, B. F.–Agostinho, F.–Almeida, C. M. V. B.–Huisingh, D. (2015): A review of limitations of GDP and alternative indices to monitor human wellbeing and to manage ecosystem functionality; J Clean Prod 87, 11–25.
Global Footprint Network (2018): https://data.footprintnetwork.org/?_ga=2.268638584.843147165.1684152515-1894331901.1684152515 Linkről letöltve 2023. március 3-án.
Global Footprint Network research team (2020): Ecological Footprint Accounting: Limitations and Criticism; letölthető dokumentum itt: https://www.footprintnetwork.org/content/uploads/2020/08/Footprint-Limitations-and-Criticism.pdf , 2024. 07. 15-i állapot szerint.
Kallis, G.–Kostakis, V.–Lange, S.–Muraca, B.–Paulson, S.–Schmelzer, M. (2018): Research on degrowth; Annu Rev Environ Resour 43 (1), 291–316.
Kocsis, T. (2014): Is the Netherlands sustainable as a globalscale innercity? Intenscoping Spatial Sustainability; Ecol Econ 101, 103–114.
Kowalski, S.–Veit W. (2020): Sustainable Society Index Summary Report 2018; letölthető dokumentum itt: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.24022.06721/1 , 2024. 07. 15-i állapot szerint
Lafortune, G.–Sachs, J. D.–Schmidt-Traub, G. (2020): It’s Called the Sustainable Development Goals Index for a Reason. In defense of our metric for measuring the world’s economic and environmental progress; letölthető dokumentum itt: https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/10/26/its-called-the-sustainable-development-goals-index-for-a-reason , 2024. 07. 15-i állapot szerint
Latouche, S. (2009): Farewell to growth; Polity, Cambridge
Lin, D.–Hanscom, L.–Murthy, A.–Galli, A.–Evans, M.–Neill, E.–Mancini, M. S.–Martindill, J.–Medouar, F.-Z.–Huang, S. … (2018): Ecological Footprint Accounting for Countries: Updates and Results of the National Footprint Accounts, 2012–2018; Resources 7 (3), 58
Lind, N. C. (1992): Some thoughts on the human development index; Soc lndic Res 27, 89–101.
McGillivray, M. (1991): The Human Development Index: Yet Another Redundant Composite Development Indicator? World Dev 19 (10), 1461–1468.
McGillivray, M.–White, H. (1993): Measuring development? The UNDP’s human development index; J Int Dev 5, 183–192.
Meadows, D. H.–Meadows, D. L.–Randers, J. (1992): Beyond the Limits: Confronting Global Collapse, Envisioning a Sustainable Future; Chelsea Green, Post Mills, VT
Meadows, D. H.–Meadows, D. L.–Randers, J.–Behrens, W. W. (1972): The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind; Universe Books, New York
Meadows, D. H.–Randers, J.–Meadows, D. L. (2004): Limits to Growth: The 30-Year Update; Chelsea Green, Post Mills, VT
Murray, J. L. (1993): Development data constraints and the Human Development Index; in. Westerndorff, D. G, Ghai, D. (szerk.): Monitoring Social Progress in the 1990s; United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, Aldershot, England, 40–64.
Niemeijer, D. (2002): Developing indicators for environmental policy: datadriven and theorydriven approaches examined by example; Environ Sci Policy 5 (2), 91–103.
OECD (2011): Towards Green Growth; OECD, Paris, France
O’Neill, D. W.–Fanning, A. L.–Lamb, W. F.–Steinberger, J. K. (2018): A good life for all within planetary boundaries; Nat Sustain 1, 88–95.
Ravallion, M. (1997): Good and Bad Growth: The Human Development Reports; World Dev 25 (5), 631–638.
Rees, W. (2018): Ecological footprint; in. Companion to environmenttal studies; Routledge, 43–48.
Reyers, B., Stafford-Smith, M.–Erb, K.-H.–Scholes, R. J.–Selomane, O. (2017): Essential Variables help to focus Sustainable Development Goals monitoring; Curr Opin in Environ Sustain 26–27, 97–105.
Sachs, J. D.–Kroll, C.–Lafortune, G.–Fuller, G.–Woelm, F. (2022): Sustainable Development Report 2022; Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Sachs, J. D.–Lafortune, G.–Fuller, G.–Drumm, E. (2023): Sustainable Development Report; Dublin University Press, Dublin
Sagar, A., Najam, A. (1998): The human development index: a critical review; Ecol Econ 25, 249–264.
Schepelmann, P.–Goossens, Y.–Makipaa, A. (szerk.) (2010): Towards Sustainable Development. Alternatives to GDP for measuring progress; Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy
Schmidt-Traub, G.–Kroll, C.–Teksoz, K.–Durand-Delacre, D.–Sachs, J. D. (2017): National baselines for the Sustainable Development Goals assessed in the SDG Index and Dashboards; Nat Geosci 10 (8), 547–555.
Sébastien, L.–Bauler, T. (2013): Use and influence of composite indicators for sustainable development at the EU-level; Ecol Indic 35, 3–12.
Seth, S. (2009): Inequality, Interactions, and Human Development; J Human Dev Capabil 10, 375–396.
Shepherd, K.–Hubbard, D.–Fenton, N.–Claxton, K.–Luedeling, E.–De Leeuw, J. (2015): Policy – Development goals should enable decisionmaking; Nature 523, 152–154.
Smulders, S.–Toman, M.–Withagen, C. (2014): Growth theory and ‘green growth’; Oxford Rev Econ Pol 30 (3), 423–446.
Stiglitz, J. E.–Sen, A. K.–Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009): Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress; Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, Paris
Szigeti, C.–Tóth, G.–Szabó, D. R. (2017): Decoupling–shifts in ecological footprint intensity of nations in the last decade; Ecol Indic 72, 111–117.
Tamburino, L.–Bravo, G. (2021): Reconciling a positive ecological balance with human development: A quantitative assessment; Ecol Indic 129, 107973
Tracking progress on the SDGs (2018). Nat Sustain 1, 377
United Nations (1993): Agenda 21: programme of action for sustainable development; Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, statement of forest principles: the final text of agreements negotiated by Governments at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), 1992. június, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, UN, New York, 3–14.
United Nations (2002): Report of the World Summit on Sustainable Development; Johannesburg, South Africa, 2002. augusztus 26–szeptember 4., United Nations, New York
United Nations Development Program (1990): Human Development Report 1990; Oxford University Press, New York
United Nations Environmental Program (2011): Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth; A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel
Vadén, T.–Lähde, V.–Majava, A.–Järvensivu, P.–Toivanen, T.–Hakala, E.–Eronen, J. T. (2020): Decoupling for ecological sustainability: a categorisation and review of research literature; Environ Sci Pol 112, 236–244.
van den Bergh, J. C. J. M.–Grazi, F. (2014): Ecological footprint policy? Land use as an environmental indicator; J Ind Ecol 18 (1), 10–19.
van den Bergh, J. C. J. M.–Grazi, F. (2015): Reply to the first systematic response by the Global Footprint Network to criticism: A real debate finally? Ecol Indic 58, 458–463.
van den Bergh, J. C. J. M.–Verbruggen, H. (1999): Spatial sustainability, trade and indicators: an evaluation of the ecological footprint; Ecol Econ 29, 61–72.
Wackernagel, M.–Rees, W. (1995): Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth; New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, BC, and Philadelphia, PA
Wang, Q.–Zhang, F.–Li, R.–Li, L. (2022): The impact of renewable energy on decoupling economic growth from ecological footprint – An empirical analysis of 166 countries; J Clean Prod 354, 131706
Ward, J. D.–Sutton, P. C.–Werner, A. D.–Costanza, R.–Mohr, S. H.–Simmons, C. T. (2016): Is Decoupling GDP Growth from Environmental Impact Possible? PLoS One 11 (10), e0164733
Washington, H.–Twomey, P. (2016): A Future Beyond Growth. Towards a Steady-State Economy; Routledge, London
World Bank (2012): Inclusive Green Growth – The Pathway to Sustainable Development; The World Bank, Washington DC
York University Ecological Footprint Initiative & Global Footprint Network (2022): National Footprint and Biocapacity Accounts, 2022 edition; Produced for the Footprint Data Foundation and distributed by Global Footprint Network, Honlap itt elérhető (2023. augusztus 15-i adatletöltés)
Letöltések
Megjelent
Folyóirat szám
Rovat
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Kovász
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
