A Shrinking Space for Participation? Measuring the Participation of Civil Society Organisations in Abkhazia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14267/1588970X.2026.019Keywords:
Abkhazia, civil society organisations, participation, statehood contestation, Council of Europe, D72, D74Abstract
In the literature, civil society organisations (CSOs) are often considered to be a crucial bridge between the state and citizens, ensuring that diverse voices are heard while the government is held accountable. However, little is known about CSO participation in contexts of prolonged contested statehood, as exemplified by the case of Abkhazia. Research has primarily focused on internal and external (geo)political dynamics related to Abkhazia, often overlooking the extent to which Abkhazian Civil Society Organisations (ACSOs) engage in decision-making and contribute to governance through activist or service-provision work. Our article addresses this gap by assessing ACSO participation using the Council of Europe Index on Civil Society Participation, which categorises engagement on a scale from low to high across four levels: information, consultation, dialogue, and partnership. We surveyed 32 ACSO representatives, enabling us to examine the current-day agency, impact, and influence of ACSOs. Combined with interviews and archival research, this approach provides a time-sensitive perspective on the evolution of CSO participation in Abkhazia, while also accounting for sectoral differentiation. Our study contributes to the body of literature on civil society participation in governance structures, highlighting the factors, extent, and evolution of this participation. The findings show that Abkhazian CSOs do not engage equally in participation, with most involvement confined to the ‘information‘ stage, implying limited cooperation with authorities amid a shrinking space for participation.
References
Adams, R., Payne, M., & Dominelli, L. (2017). Social work: Themes, issues and criti cal debates. Palgrave Macmillan. Aliyev, H. (2015). Post-communist civil society and the Soviet legacy: Challenges of democratisation and reform in the Caucasus. Springer.
Aqaba, N., & Hintba, I. (2011). Трансформация грузино-абхазского конфликта: Переосмысление парадигмы [The transformation of the Georgian-Abkhaz conflict: Rethinking the paradigm]. Apsnypress News Agency.
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.
Article 19. (2007). A survey of access to information in Abkhazia and its impact on people’s lives. https://www.article19.org/data/files/pdfs/publications/abkhazia foi-report.pdf
Atlani-Duault, L. (2007). Humanitarian aid in post-Soviet countries: An anthropolog ical perspective. Routledge.
Babajanian, B. V. (2005). Bottom up and top down? Community development in post-Soviet Armenia: The social fund model. Social Policy & Administration, 39(4), 448–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2005.00449.x
Batley, R., & Rose, P. (2011). Analysing collaboration between non-governmental service providers and governments. Public Administration and Development, 31(4), 230–239. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.613
Belyaeva, N. Y., & Karastelev, V. E. (2012). Формы гражданского участия гражданских объединений в публичной политике [Forms of civic partic ipation by civic associations in public policy]. In Proceedings of the XII Interna tional Scientific Conference on the Problems of Economic and Social Development (pp. 302–310).
Bila-Tiunova, L., Bilous-Osin, T., Kozachuk, D., & Vasylkivska, V. (2019). Partic ipation of civil society in public administration: Prospects for international experience implementation in Ukraine. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(5), 757–764. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7594
Blichfeldt, V. (2024, November 13). Georgia’s dream of autocracy. New Eastern Europe. https://neweasterneurope.eu/post-author/viktor-blichfeldt/
Bolleyer, N. (2024). Civil society’s democratic potential: Organizational trade-offs between participation and representation. Oxford University Press.
Broers, L. (2012). Two sons of one mother: Nested identities and centre-periph ery politics in post-Soviet Georgia. In A. Schönle (Ed.), When the elephant broke out of the zoo: A festschrift for Donald Rayfield. Stanford University Press.
Bucerius, S. M. (2013). Becoming a “trusted outsider”: Gender, ethnicity, and ine quality in ethnographic research. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 42(6), 690–721. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124161349774
Conference of INGOs of the Council of Europe. (2009). Code of good practice for civil participation in the decision-making process. Council of Europe. https:// rm.coe.int/16802eed5c Conciliation Resources. (2012, July). Mediation and dialogue in the South Cauca sus. https://www.c-r.org/resource/politics-and-mediation-schlaining-process Crenshaw, K. W. (2017). On intersectionality: Essential writings. The New Press. Fox, J. (2016). Scaling accountability through vertically integrated civil society policy monitoring and advocacy. The Institute of Development Studies and Partner Organisations. Report. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12413/12683
Gani, J. K., & Khan, R. M. (2024). Positionality statements as a function of colo niality: Interrogating reflexive methodologies. International Studies Quarterly, 68(2), sqae038. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqae038
Gezerdava, S. (2010). Государственный суверенитет Абхазии и российско абхазские отношения [Abkhaz state sovereignty and Russian-Abkhaz rela tions]. In Prospects for international recognition of Abkhazia.
Gezerdava, S. (2019). Соотношение Конституции Республики Абхазия и международных стандартов в области свободы объединения: Значение для гражданского общества [Relationship between the Constitution of the Republic of Abkhazia and international standards on freedom of association: Implications for civil society]. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 1, 56–64.
Giloyan, E. (2021, October 3). Не наша традиция. В Абхазии впервые заговорили о домашнем насилии [Not our tradition: Abkhazia speaks out about domestic violence for the first time]. Kavkaz Realii. https://www.kavkazr.com/a/31143060. html
Hammarberg, T., & Grono, M. (2017). Human rights in Abkhazia today. https:// www.palmecenter.se/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Human-Rights-in-Abkha zia-Today-Report-by-Thomas-Hammarberg-and-Magdalena-Grono.pdf
Keleher, L., & Kosko, S. J. (Eds.). (2019). Agency and democracy in development ethics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108163880
Kolstø, P., & Blakkisrud, H. (2013). Yielding to the sons of the soil: Abkhazian democracy and the marginalization of the Armenian vote. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36(12), 2075–2095. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2012.675079
Kopeček, V., Hoch, T., & Baar, V. (2016). De facto states and democracy: The case of Abkhazia. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-Economic Series, 32, 85–104. https:// doi.org/10.1515/bog-2016-0017
Kvarchelia, L. (2008). Sanctions and the path away from peace. In Powers of per suasion: Incentives, sanctions and conditionality in peacemaking.
Le Pavic, Gaëlle. (2023). An Abkhaz Civil Society Organization in the Abkhaz (De Facto) State. In The Palgrave Handbook of Non-State Actors in East-West Rela tions, P. Marton et al. (eds.). Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-031-05750-2_20-1.
Le Pavic, Gaëlle (2024b). Social Services Provision in Samegrelo Zemo Svaneti, Georgia. UNU Institute on Comparative Regional Integration Studies. https:// cris.unu.edu/social-services-provision-samegrelo-zemo-svaneti-georgia.
Le Pavic, G. (2024c). Social services within and across contested borders: Insights from Transnistria, Abkhazia and Samegrelo (Doctoral dissertation, Ghent Univer sity). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.24388.23682
Le Pavic, G., Orsini, G., Bossuyt, F., & Lietaert, I. (2024). Negotiating de facto bor ders: The case of social services provision in Abkhazia and Transnistria. Eur asian Geography and Economics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/1 0.1080/15387216.2024.2305423
Le Pavic, G., Zviadadze, T., Orsini, G., & Lietaert, I. (2022). Providing welfare ser vice within and across contested borders: The activities of civil society organisa tions in Transnistria and Abkhazia (Working paper). United Nations University (CRIS). https://cris.unu.edu/providing-welfare-service-within-and-across contested-borders-activities-civil-society-organisations
Luciani, L. (2022). Decentring EU human rights promotion: Three civil society strug gles and the geopolitics of the EU’s interventions in the South Caucasus (Doctoral dissertation, Ghent University).
Luciani, L. (2023). Navigating a “shrinking space”: Selective in/visibilities and EU engagement with civil society in Azerbaijan. Europe-Asia Studies, 75(10), 1720 1743, https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2023.2267196
Marton, P., Thomasen, G., Békés, C., & Rácz, A. (Eds.). (2024). The Palgrave hand book of non-state actors in East-West relations. Springer.
Nodia, G. (2005). Civil society development in Georgia: Achievements and challenges. Caucasus Institute for Peace, Democracy and Development.
Ó Beacháin, D. (2016). Elections and nation-building in Abkhazia. In Nation building and identity in the post-Soviet space. Routledge.
O’Loughlin, J., Kolossov, V., Toal, G., & Tuathail, G. (2011). Inside Abkhazia: Survey of attitudes in a de facto state. Post-Soviet Affairs, 27(1), 1–36, https:// doi.org/10.2747/1060-586X.27.1.1
Patrushev, S. V., Aivazova, S. G., & Panov, F. V. (2011). Граждане и политические практики в современной России: Воспроизводство и трансформация институционального порядка [Citizens and political practices in modern Russia: Reproduction and transformation of the institutional order]. ROSSPEN.
Peinhopf, A. (2022). Crossing the conflict divide: De facto borders, state belong ing, and the changing dynamics of enemy relations in Abkhazia. Ethnopoli tics, 22(3), 253-270, https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2022.2028385
Popescu, N. (2006). Democracy in secessionism: Transnistria and Abkhazia’s domes tic policies. Open Society Institute.
Popescu, N. (2010). The EU and civil society in the Georgian–Abkhaz conflict (MICRO CON Policy Working Paper No. 15).
Prelz Oltramonti, G., & Le Pavic, G. (2025). Hardening ceasefire lines in pro tracted secessionist conflicts: From the negotiating table and international law to realities on the ground in the case of the Abkhaz–Georgian war. In J. Grzybowski, G. Prelz Oltramonti, & A. Verdebout (Eds.), Contested states in war and law. Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.56687/9781529246919-010
Rosenzweigová, I., & Škoric, V. (2016). Civil participation in decision-making pro cesses: An overview of standards and practices in Council of Europe member states. Council of Europe.
Salamon, L. M., Anheier, H. K., List, R., Toepler, S., & Sokolowski, W. (1999). Global civil society: Dimensions of the nonprofit sector. Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies.
Saurugger, S. (2007). Democratic “misfit”? Conceptions of civil society partici pation in France and the European Union. Political Studies, 55(2), 384–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00662.x
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles published in the journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) 4.0 international license agreement and published open access, making them immediately and freely available to read and download. The CC-BY license agreement allows authors to retain copyright while allowing others to copy, distribute, and make some uses of the work.
Users have the right to copy, distribute and transmit an article, adapt the article and make commercial use of the article. The CC BY license permits commercial re-use of an open access article, as long as the author is properly attributed. This license permits, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided by the original work is properly cited.
Suitable reference form: Title of Article, Author, Journal Title, Volume, Issue.
If and when the manuscript is accepted for publication by the journal, the authors agree to automatically transfer the first right of publication to the journal, and permit the journal to apply a DOI to their articles and to archive them in databases and indexes. Copyrights for articles are retained by the authors.
