The non-state actor contestation of battery factory investments in Hungary: the activism of GÖD-ÉRT and MIAKÖ

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14267/1588970X.2026.015

Keywords:

Hungary, industrial policy, battery factories, non-state activism, autocracy, illiberal regime, D70, H10, L31

Abstract

The article analyses non-state actor (NSA) agency at the intersection of autocratisation and new industrial policies. We focus on Hungary, an EU Member State that aims to become a leading global player in the electric vehicle sector, particularly in EV battery production. Besides the already functioning South Korean plants, numerous Chinese firms have been attracted to the country by extremely generous state support to build giga-factories. However, battery-related plants face opposition from the local population. Under the Hungarian autocratic regime, the space for NSA agency is increasingly shrinking, yet our focus is narrowed to analysing non-governmental organisations. We ask whether organised civil society can exercise political or domain-specific agency in an autocratising regime. Bottom-up initiatives against the battery factories mushroomed in all the affected Hungarian localities, which increasingly cooperated with each other, and even set up an umbrella organisation at the national level. Some important achievements are documented. To illustrate the causes of the limited non-state actor activism and nevertheless account for how impactful changes have occurred, the article analyses the experiences of two local associations: GÖD-ÉRT (the For Göd Association) and MIAKÖ (the Mothers of Mikepércs for the Environment Association). At the time of study, both have been forced to operate in an increasingly repressive setting. 

References

Aradi, H. Zs. (2023, April 28). New decree makes public hearing without the public present possible in Hungary. Telex. https://telex.hu/english/2023/04/28/new decree-makes-public-hearing-without-the-public-present-possible-in-hungary

Átlátszó. (2014, September 9). Hungary continues campaign against NGOs with massive police raid. Átlátszó. https://english.atlatszo.hu/2014/09/09/hungary continues-campaign-against-ngos-with-massive-police-raid/

Bíró-Nagy, A., Csontos, T., Molnár, K., & Varga, A. (2024). Hopes, aspirations and fears: A comprehensive survey of Hungarians in 2024. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. https://www.policysolutions.hu/en/news/658/hopes_aspirations_fears_2024

Bloom, J. M. (2014). Political opportunity structure, contentious social move ments, and state-based organisations: The fight against Solidarity inside the Polish United Workers Party. Social Science History, 38(3–4), 359–388. https:// doi.org/10.1017/ssh.2015.29

Boda, Z. (2024). Shrinking space: The changing political opportunities of advo cacy groups in illiberal governance. European Politics and Society, 25(4), 664 683. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2023.2287245

Bodnár, Zs. (2024, April 5). Greenpeace finds fetotoxic solvent in Göd wastewater pipe burst. Átlátszó. https://english.atlatszo.hu/2024/04/05/greenpeace-finds fetotoxic-solvent-in-god-waste-water-pipe-burst/

Bodnár, Zs. (2025a, February 3). Jogsértően tart vissza iratokat a kormányhivatal a gödi akkugyár perében. Átlátszó. https://atlatszo.hu/orszagszerte/2025/02/03/ jogsertoen-tart-vissza-iratokat-a-kormanyhivatal-a-godi-akkugyar-pereben/

Bodnár, Zs. (2025b, September 4). 8,5 tonna magzatkárosító szert bocsátott ki a gödi akkugyár 2023-ban. Átlátszó. https://atlatszo.hu/orszagszerte/2025/09/04/85 tonna-magzatkarosito-szert-bocsatott-ki-a-godi-akkugyar-2023-ban/

Bodnár, Zs., & Bodoky, T. (2024, September 14). NGO that revealed Samsung’s pollution targeted by Sovereignty Protection Office. Átlátszó. https://english. atlatszo.hu/2024/09/14/ngo-that-revealed-samsungs-pollution-targeted-by sovereignty-protection-office/

Bogdanova, E., Cook, L. J., & Kulmala, M. (2018). The carrot or the stick? Con straints and opportunities of Russia’s CSO policy. Europe-Asia Studies, 70(4), 501–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2018.1471803

Buzogány, A., Kerényi, Sz., & Olt, G. (2022). Back to the grassroots? The shrinking space of environmental activism in illiberal Hungary. Environmental Politics, 31(7), 1267–1288. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2022.2113607

Chaudhry, S. (2022). The assault on civil society: Explaining state crackdown on NGOs. International Organization, 76(3), 549–590. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0020818321000473

CIVICUS Monitor. (2025). National civic space ratings. https://www.monitor.civi cus.org Civil Presidency. (2024). Recommendations of the Civil EU-Presidency on EV battery production. https://civilpresidency.hu/en/news-items/battery-conference statement

Croissant, A., & Tomini, L. (Eds.). (2024). The Routledge handbook of autocratiza tion. Routledge.

Csanádi, M., Gerő, M., Hajdu, M., Kovách, I., Laki, M., & Tóth, I. J. (2022). Dynam ics of an authoritarian system. Central European University Press.

Davis, A. P., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Civil society and democracy under pressure: Does authoritarian mobilization and party incapacity diminish the positive effect of civil society? The Sociological Quarterly, 65(2), 225–245. https://doi.org /10.1080/00380253.2023.2289500

Debreciner. (2025a, July 22). Akkupiknik – Magyar Péter és a Mikepércsi Anyák beszé lgetése [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNI6Zzi6ieI

Debreciner. (2025b, October 1). Bizonyító erejű technológiát adna a civilek kezébe a Miakö [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b5OGl4iYp9E

Economx. (2026, February 15). Utcára vonultak a gödi akkumulátorgyár miatt, nem csitul a felháborodás. Economx. https://www.economx.hu/bel fold/2026/02/15/godi-akkumulatorgyar-tuntetes-samsung-823950/

European Parliament. (2022, September 15). MEPs: Hungary can no longer be con sidered a full democracy [Press release]. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/ en/press-room/20220909IPR40137/meps-hungary-can-no-longer-be-consid ered-a-full-democracy

Feldstein, S. (2021). The rise of digital repression: How digital technology is reshaping power, politics, and resistance. Oxford University Press.

Flachner, B. (2023). Egy friss közvélemény-kutatás szerint a debreceniek 64 százaléka nem akarja az akkugyárat [According to a recent poll, 64 percent of Debrecen residents do not want the battery factory]. Telex. https://telex. hu/belfold/2023/02/10/debrecen-akkumulatorgyar-catl-kozvelemeny-kutatas

Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge University Press.

Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualita tive Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363

Foley, M. W., & Edwards, B. (1996). The paradox of civil society. Journal of Democ racy, 7(3), 38–52.

Gerő, M., Fejős, A., Kerényi, S., & Szikra, D. (2023). From exclusion to co-optation: Political opportunity structures and civil society responses in de-democratis ing Hungary. Politics and Governance, 11(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag. v11i1.5883

Hungarian Helsinki Committee. (2025, May 13). Submission of a bill on the trans parency of public life (T/11923). https://helsinki.hu/en/wp-content/uploads/ sites/2/2025/05/Bill-T11923_Transparency-of-Public-Life.pdf

Hungary Matters. (2024, January 3). Sovereignty office “to safeguard elections”.

Ivanov, D. (2025). Do populists in power or the economy impact civic culture? East European Politics and Societies, 39(2), 383–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 08883254251335936

Jelinek, A. (2024, May 22). Ellenzéki aktivisták blokkolják a gödi Samsung-gyár bejáratait. https://444.hu/2024/05/22/ellenzeki-aktivistak-blokkoljak-a-godi sam sung-gyar-bejaratait

Jogászvilág. (2026, February 11). A Kúria közleményt adott ki a gödi Samsung gyár ral kapcsolatos döntéséről. https://jogaszvilag.hu/napi/a-kuria-kozlemenyt adott-ki-a-godi-samsung-gyarral-kapcsolatos-donteserol/

Kitschelt, H. (1986). Political opportunity structures and political protest: Anti nuclear movements in four democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 16, 57–85. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712340000380X

Kopecký, P., & Mudde, C. (2003). Uncivil society: Contentious politics in post-commu nist Europe. Routledge.

Kornai, J. (2015). Hungary’s U-turn. Society and Economy, 37(3), 279–329. https:// www.jstor.org/stable/43774219

Kornai, J. (2016). The system paradigm revisited: Clarification and additions in the light of experiences in the post-socialist region. Acta Oeconomica, 66(4), 547–596. https://doi.org/10.1556/032.2016.66.4.1

Li, H., & Farid, M. (2023). Stay or exit: How do international nongovernmen tal organizations respond to institutional pressures under authoritarianism? Regulation & Governance, 17(2), 512–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12473

Lorch, J. (2017). Civil society support for military coups: Bangladesh and the Phil ippines. Journal of Civil Society, 13(2), 184–201.

Lührmann, A., & Lindberg, S. I. (2019). A third wave of autocratization is here: What is new about it? Democratization, 26(7), 1095–1113. https://doi.org/10.108 0/13510347.2019.1582029

Marton, P. (2024). A theory of non-state actors. In P. Marton, G. Thomasen, A. Rácz, & Cs. Békés (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of non-state actors in East West relations (pp. 19–38). Palgrave Macmillan.

Marton, P., & Thomasen, G. (2024). Non-state actors in East–West relations. In P. Marton, G. Thomasen, A. Rácz, & Cs. Békés (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of non-state actors in East–West relations (pp. 3–18). Palgrave Macmillan.

Mázsár, T. (2023, November 29). Megsemmisítette a Kúria a debreceni CATL beruházásra kiadott katasztrófavédelmi engedélyt. https://24.hu/belfold/2023 /11/29/ debrecen-akkugyar-catl-beruhazas-kuria-katasztrofavedelmi-engedely/

Meyer, D. S. (2004). Protest and political opportunities. Annual Review of Sociol ogy, 30, 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110545

Mikepércsi Anyák. (2023, March 31). Egyre nő az akkumulátor-ellenes országos összefogás tábora. https://debreciner.hu/cikk/13133_egyre_no_az_akkumula tor_ellenes_orszagos_osszefogas

Orbán, V. (2014, July 29). The era of the work-based state is approaching (Speech at the 25th Bálványos Summer Free University). https://2010-2015.miniszterel nok.hu/in_english_article/the_era_of_the_work-based_state_is_approaching

Orbán, V. (2025a, February 21). Let 2025 be a year of breakthrough: The annual state of the nation speech. https://miniszterelnok.hu/en/let-2025-be-a-year-of breakthrough/

Orbán, V. (2025b). Speech by Prime Minister Viktor Orbán on the 177th anniversary of the Hungarian Revolution and War of Independence of 1848–49. https://about hungary.hu/speeches-and-remarks/speech-by-prime-minister-viktor-orban on-the-177th-anniversary-of-the-hungarian-revolution-and-war-of-indepen dence-of-184849

Polyak, P. (2026). Sacrifice zones: How Europe’s electric vehicle transition is entangled with coercive zoning on its semi-periphery. Politics and Gover nance, 14, Article 11267. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.11267

Polgár Tóth, T. (2024, March 20). Másodjára is megkapta a katasztrófavédelmi enge délyt a CATL debreceni akkumulátorgyára. Debreciner. https://debreciner.hu/ cikk/16295_masodjara_is_megkapta_a_katasztrofavedelmi_engedelyt

Rochon, T. R., & Mazmanian, D. A. (1993). Social movements and the policy process. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 528(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716293528001006

Sombatpoonsiri, J. (2024). Civil society and autocratization. In A. Croissant & L. Tomini (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of autocratization (pp. 305–317). Rout ledge.

Szalai, A. (2025). A környezeti károkozás társadalmi kontrollja: Az ellenállás kon trollja egy magyarországi esettanulmány tükrében. Kriminológiai Közlemé nyek, 85, 195–214.

Sovereignty Protection Office. (2025, February 12). Report on the operation of the Soros network in Debrecen: Foreign-funded network building in Hungary’s second most populous city. https://szuverenitasvedelmihivatal.hu/dokumentumok/ report-on-the-operation-of-Soros-network-in-Debrecen.pdf

Tomini, L., Gibril, S., & Bochev, V. (2023). Standing up against autocratization across political regimes: A comparative analysis of resistance actors and strategies. Democratization, 30(1), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2022.2115480

V-Dem Institute. (2023). Democracy report 2023: Defiance in the face of autocrati zation. University of Gothenburg. https://www.v-dem.net/documents/29/V dem_democracyreport2023_lowres.pdf

V-Dem Institute. (2025). Democracy report 2025: 25 years of autocratization— Democracy trumped? University of Gothenburg. https://www.v-dem.net/ documents/61/v-dem-dr__2025_lowres_v2.pdf

Weiler, V. (2025, February 28). Úgy ontotta magából a fekete port a gödi Samsung, hogy elszíneződött a gyár teteje. Telex. https://telex.hu/gazdasag/2025/02/28/ samsung-god-akkumulatorgyar-mergezo-anyag-fekete-por-ncm-nca-nikkel kobalt-elszinezodes

Weiler, V. (2026, February 14). “Viktor stripped the factory of protection”: The cover up at Samsung’s Hungarian battery plant and how the government mishandled it. Telex. https://telex.hu/komplex/2026/02/14/viktor-stripped-the-factory-of protection-the-cover-up-at-samsung-s-toxic-battery-plant-in-hungary-and how-the-government-mishandled-it

Wu, Q. M. (2024). The embrace and resistance of Chinese battery investments in Hungary: The case of CATL. Asia Europe Journal, 22, 201–223. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10308-024-00699-9

Additional Files

Published

2026-06-29

Issue

Section

Thematic issue on the paradoxes of non-state actor agency in contemporary Central and Eastern Europe (edited by Péter Marton)

How to Cite

Ricz, J., & Éltető, A. (2026). The non-state actor contestation of battery factory investments in Hungary: the activism of GÖD-ÉRT and MIAKÖ. Society and Economy in Central and Eastern Europe, 48(2), 64-91. https://doi.org/10.14267/1588970X.2026.015