An evaluation of decoupling in the Hungarian economy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14267/1588970X.2026.005

Keywords:

GVA, GHG, trends, Tapio’s decoupling coefficient, sectoral analysis, Hungary, Q56

Abstract

The paper examines the relationship between economic growth and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Hungary from 1995 to 2022 using the Tapio decoupling model and the Mann-Kendall trend test. The Tapio decoupling elasticity coefficient (DI) was used to assess the relation between economic activity and environmental impact. The Mann-Kendall trend test was used to detect monotonic trends in Gross Value Added (GVA) and emissions, revealing their statistical significance and direction of change. The results revealed varying decoupling trends across various sectors. Strong decoupling occurred in sectors like B, C, D, and E, where emissions decreased alongside economic growth, reflecting technological advancements and structural shifts. Weak decoupling was observed in sectors such as A, F, G, and Q, where emissions grew more slowly than GVA, indicating progress but falling short of full decoupling. Conversely, sector T exhibited expansive negative decoupling, revealing unsustainable growth. At the national level, data from recent years have shown a trend toward absolute decoupling, in which GVA grew as emissions stabilized or declined. The Mann-Kendall test confirmed consistent economic growth across all sectors but diverse emission trends. Sectors like B and E achieved significant reductions in emissions, while others, including A and T, recorded increases. 

References

Barbier, E. (2011). The policy challenges for green economy and sustainable economic development. Natural Resources Forum, 35, 233-245. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2011.01397.x

Chen, Y., & Wang, Y. (2024). Research on the measurement of the relationship between carbon emissions and economic development in China—Based on the Tapio decoupling theory and the environmental Kuznets theory analysis. E3S Web of Conferences, 528, 03011. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202452803011

Cohen, G., Jalles, J. T., Loungani, P., & Marto, R. (2018). The long-run decoupling of emissions and output: Evidence from the largest emitters. Energy Policy, 118, 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.028

Dahmani, M., Mabrouki, M., & Ragni, L. (2021). Decoupling analysis of green house gas emissions from economic growth: A case study of Tunisia. Ener gies, 14(22), 7550. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14227550

Daly, H. E., & Farley, J. (2018). Ecological economics: Principles and applications (2nd ed.). Island Press.

Frodyma, K., Papież, M., & Śmiech, S. (2020). Decoupling economic growth from fossil fuel use—Evidence from 141 countries in the 25-year perspective. Ener gies, 13(24), 6671. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13246671

Government of Hungary. (2024). Jedlik Ányos Energy Program: HUF 96 billion sup port for more efficient and greener district heating. https://kormany.hu/hirek/ jedlik-anyos-energetikai-program-96-milliard-forint-tamogatas-a-hatekon yabb-es-zoldebb-tavfutesert

Government of Hungary. (2025). The energy home renovation program restarts with simplified conditions. https://kormany.hu/hirek/egyszerusitett-feltetelekkel indul-ujra-az-energetikai-otthonfelujitasi-program

Gutiérrez-Hernández, O., & García, L. V. (2024). Robust trend analysis in environ mental remote sensing: A case study of cork oak forest decline. Remote Sens ing, 16(20), 3886. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16203886

Haberl, H., Wiedenhofer, D., Virág, D., Kalt, G., Plank, B., Brockway, P., Fishman, T., Hausknost, D., Krausmann, F., & Leon-Gruchalski, B. (2020). A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emis sions, part II: Synthesizing the insights. Environmental Research Letters, 15(6), 065003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a

Hickel, J. (2020). The contradictions of the green economy: A critique of the current trajectory. Ecological Economics, 169, 106509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ecolecon.2019.106509

Hu, J., Gui, S., & Zhang, W. (2017). Decoupling analysis of China’s product sector output and its embodied carbon emissions—An empirical study based on non-competitive I–O and Tapio decoupling model. Sustainability, 9(5), 815. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050815

Hungarian Central Statistical Office. (n.d.). Database. https://www.ksh.hu International

Energy Agency. (2020). Key world energy statistics 2020. https:// www.iea.org/reports/key-world-energy-statistics-2020

Jackson, T. (2009). Prosperity without growth: Economics for a finite planet. Routledge.

Jing, L., Zhou, B., & Liao, Z. (2024). Decoupling analysis of economic growth and carbon emissions in Xinjiang based on Tapio and logarithmic mean Divisia index models. Sustainability, 16(18), 8010. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188010

Karagjozi, B. (2025). Beyond materialism: The philosophy and ethics of degrowth. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, 42, 111–118. https:// doi.org/10.55549/epess.915

Kendall, M. G. (1975). Rank correlation methods (4th ed.). Charles Griffin.

Kocsis, T., Kovács-Székely, I., & Anda, A. (2020). Homogeneity tests and non-par ametric analyses of tendencies in precipitation time series in Keszthely, West ern Hungary. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 139(3–4), 849–859. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s00704-019-03014-4

Le Quéré, C., Korsbakken, J. I., Wilson, C., Tosun, J., Andrew, R., Andres, R. J., Canadell, J. G., Jordan, A., Peters, G. P., & van Vuuren, D. P. (2019). Drivers of declining CO₂ emissions in 18 developed economies. Nature Climate Change, 9(5), 348–353. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0419-7

Leal, P. H., & Marques, A. C. (2022). The evolution of the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis assessment: A literature review under a critical analysis per spective. Heliyon, 8(11), e11271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11521

Li, K., Zhou, Y., Xiao, H., Li, Z., & Shan, Y. (2021). Decoupling of economic growth from CO₂ emissions in Yangtze River Economic Belt cities. Science of the Total Environment, 775, 145927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145927

Li, R., & Jiang, R. (2017). Moving low-carbon construction industry in Jiangsu Province: Evidence from decomposition and decoupling models. Sustainabil ity, 9(6), 1013. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9061013

Magyar Energetikai és Közmű-szabályozási Hivatal. (2025). Obligations, goals and policies (ENHAT). https://enhat.mekh.hu/kotelezettseg-celok-es-szak politikak

Hungarian National Bank. (2025). Available state subsidies – Green financial solu tions. https://www.mnb.hu/fogyasztovedelem/csaladi-zold-penzugyek/zold penzugyi-megoldasok/tamogatasok-palyazatok/elerheto-allami-tamogatasok

Mann, H. B. (1945). Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica, 13(3), 245 259. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907187

Mikayilov, J. I., Hasanov, F. J., & Galeotti, M. (2018). Decoupling of CO₂ emis sions and GDP: A time-varying cointegration approach. Ecological Indicators, 95, 615–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.07.051

Naqvi, A., & Zwickl, K. (2017). Fifty shades of green: Revisiting decoupling by eco nomic sectors and air pollutants. Ecological Economics, 133, 111–126. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.09.017

National Center for Atmospheric Research. (2014). Greenhouse gas emissions and climate policy scenarios: A model-based analysis. https://ncar.ucar.edu/publica tions/greenhouse-gas-emissions-and-climate-policy-scenarios

Rodríguez, M. J. D., Ares, A. C., & de Lucas Santos, S. (2018). Cyclical fluctua tion patterns and decoupling: Towards common EU-28 environmental per formance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 696–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2017.11.244

Sanyé-Mengual, E., Secchi, M., Corrado, S., Beylot, A., & Sala, S. (2019). Assess ing the decoupling of economic growth from environmental impacts in the European Union: A consumption-based approach. Journal of Cleaner Produc tion, 236, 117535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.010

Stern, D. I. (2017). The environmental Kuznets curve after 25 years. Journal of Bio economics, 19(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-017-9243-1

Tapio, P. (2005). Towards a theory of decoupling: Degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001. Transport Policy, 12(2), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.01.001

Vadén, T., Lähde, V., Majava, A., Järvensivu, P., Toivanen, T., & Eronen, J. T. (2020a). Raising the bar: On the type, size, and timeline of a “successful” decoupling. Environmental Politics, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.202 0.1783951

Vadén, T., Lähde, V., Majava, A., Järvensivu, P., Toivanen, T., Hakala, E., & Eronen, J. T. (2020b). Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisa tion and review of research literature. Environmental Science & Policy, 112, 236 244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016

Wang, Q., & Su, M. (2020). Drivers of decoupling economic growth from carbon emission: An empirical analysis of 192 countries using decoupling model and decomposition method. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 81, 106356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106356

Wiedenhofer, D., Virág, D., Kalt, G., Plank, B., Streeck, J., Pichler, M., Mayer, A., Krausmann, F., Brockway, P., Schaffartzik, A., Fishman, T., Hausknost, D., Leon-Gruchalski, B., Sousa, T., Creutzig, F., & Haberl, H. (2020). A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use, and GHG emis sions, part I: Bibliometric and conceptual mapping. Environmental Research Letters, 15(6), 063002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab8429

Wu, Y., Zhu, Q., & Zhu, B. (2018). Decoupling analysis of world economic growth and CO₂ emissions: A study comparing developed and developing coun tries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 190, 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2018.04.139

Downloads

Published

2026-03-11

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Szilágyi, D., & Kocsis, T. (2026). An evaluation of decoupling in the Hungarian economy. Society and Economy in Central and Eastern Europe, 48(1), 87-116. https://doi.org/10.14267/1588970X.2026.005