Does counters’ responsibility end at the margin of the marginal utility?
Reflection on „The Marginal Utilities and Marginal Costs of Having Children” by Péter Mihályi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35551/PFQ_2020_1_2Keywords:
population reduction, childbearing, J13, J22, J24Abstract
In his article published in the 2019/4 issue of the Public Finance Quarterly, Péter Mihályi argues that in Hungary, population reduction and aging cannot be significantly reduced within national frameworks, no matter how large the amount of money by which the state tries to reduce the individual costs of childbearing is. In contrast, on the one hand, this article points out that there are realistic options for reducing the gap between the number of children desired and the number of children actually delivered, and thereby significantly increasing the fertility rate. On the other hand, the article outlines a number of factors (emigration, high rates of childlessness) that should be taken into account when designing a model for the individual utility of childbearing, and thus give families additional aspects to consider when making decisions in terms of childbearing.
References
Kapitány B., Spéder Zs. (2012). Gyermekvállalás. In: Demográfiai Portré. Népesedéstudományi Intézet, Budapest
Kapitány B., Spéder Zs. (2018). Gyermekvállalás. In: Demográfiai Portré. Népesedéstudományi Intézet, Budapest, 53. oldal
Pulay Gy. (2010). A gyermekvállalást segítő munkavállalás. Polgár Szemle, VI. évfolyam, 4. szám, 344–349. oldal
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors assign copyright to Pénzügyi Szemle / Public Finance Quarterly. Authors are responsible for permission to reproduce copyright material from other sources.