Large language models as collaborative learning partners in higher education: a theoretical framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14267/1588970X.2026.024Keywords:
artificial intelligence, educational technology, collaborative learning, higher education, large language models, theoretical framework, I23, O33, I21Abstract
The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into higher education environments reveals notable challenges within existing educational technology frameworks. Current theoretical models conceptualize artificial intelligence as an instrumental tool that supports human learning processes, yet numerous empirical studies demonstrate that LLMs function as collaborative learning partners with reciprocal agency, dynamic adaptation capabilities, and shared knowledge-construction behaviors. Research in Hungarian higher education contexts provides compelling evidence for this partnership phenomenon, with studies revealing that students primarily use AI systems for collaborative tasks such as brainstorming, information exploration, and iterative problem-solving rather than simple tool operation (Folmeg et al., 2024). I pro-pose the Collaborative Learning Partnership Model as a theoretical framework that reconceptualizes LLMs as active learning agents rather than passive educational instruments. Drawing from systematic analyses of recent implementation research across multiple educational domains, my model identifies four core components: reciprocal agency, dynamic contextual adaptation, shared knowledge construction, and transparent collaboration protocols. This frame-work addresses challenges in AI integration, including academic integrity concerns, assessment innovation, and pedagogical role transformation. The model provides a theoretical foundation for effective LLM integration while maintaining educational rigor and human agency in learning processes. Furthermore, I present a four-stage partnership development progression that guides practical implementation strategies.
References
Albadarneh, A. M., Daradkah, A. M., Telf, E. A., Haggag, H. M., Ghawanmeh, F. F., Al-Shunnaq, Y. A., Tawalbeh, M. S., Mahmoud, A. M. A., Shahine, K., & Daradkah, H. S. (2024). Integrating Artificial Intelligence-Powered Large Language Models in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Teacher Education Programs. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences, 22(1), 2184–2191. https://doi.org/10.57239/PJLSS-2024-22.1.00219
Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Prentice Hall.
Barkley, E. F., Major, C. H., & Cross, K. P. (2014). Collaborative Learning Techniques: A Handbook for College Faculty (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Berbenyuk, A., Powell, L., & Zary, N. (2024). Feasibility and Educational Value of Clinical Cases Generated Using Large Language Models. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 316, 1524–1528. https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI240705
Claman, D., & Sezgin, E. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Dental Education: Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models and Multimodal Foundation Models. JMIR Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.2196/52346
Csapó, B., & Molnár, G. (2019). Online Diagnostic Assessment in Support of Per¬sonalized Teaching and Learning: The eDia System. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01522
Downes, S. (2012). Connectivism and Connective Knowledge: Essays on Meaning and Learning Networks. National Research Council Canada.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Orienta-konsultit.
Folmeg, M., Fekete, I., & Koris, R. (2024). Towards identifying the components of students’ AI literacy: An exploratory study based on Hungarian higher edu¬cation students’ perceptions. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Prac¬tice, 21. https://doi.org/10.53761/wzyrwj33
Gao, L., Madaan, A., Zhou, S., Alon, U., Liu, P., Yang, Y., Callan, J., & Neubig, G. (2023). PAL: Program-aided Language Models. 10764–10799. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.10435
Horvath, L. (2023). Adaptive pedagogical strategies responding to emergency remote teaching – immediate responses of Hungarian primary school teach¬ers. Research in Learning Technology, 31. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v31.2978
Horvath, L., Helga, M., Hülber, L., Papp-Danka, A., Pintér, T., & Dringó-Horváth, I. (2020). Tanárképzők digitális kompetenciájának mérése – a DigCompEdu adaptálása a hazai felsőoktatási környezetre. Neveléstudomány, 8, 5–25. https://doi.org/10.21549/NTNY.29.2020.2.1
Horváth, L., M. Pintér, T., Misley, H., & Dringó-Horváth, I. (2025). Validity evi¬dence regarding the use of DigCompEdu as a self-reflection tool: The case of Hungarian teacher educators. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12914-6
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001
Jošt, G., Taneski, V., & Karakatič, S. (2024). The Impact of Large Language Models on Programming Education and Student Learning Outcomes. Applied Sci¬ences, 14(10), 4115. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14104115
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Karabacak, M., Ozkara, B. B., Margetis, K., Wintermark, M., & Bisdas, S. (2023). The Advent of Generative Language Models in Medical Education. JMIR Med¬ical Education, 9(1), e48163. https://doi.org/10.2196/48163
Kétyi, A., Géring, Z., & Dén-Nagy, I. (2024). ChatGPT from the students’ point of view – Lessons from a pilot study using ChatGPT in business higher edu¬cation. Society and Economy, 47(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1556/204.2024.00007
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
Lee, A. V. Y., Teo, C. L., & Tan, S. C. (2024). Prompt Engineering for Knowledge Creation: Using Chain-of-Thought to Support Students’ Improvable Ideas. AI, 5(3), 1446–1461. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai5030069
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowl¬edge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Molnár, G., & Csapó, B. (2023). Report on Smart Education in Hungary. In R. Zhuang, D. Liu, D. Sampson, D. Mandic, S. Zou, Y. Huang, & R. Huang (Eds.), Smart Education in China and Central & Eastern European Countries (pp. 155– 178). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7319-2_7
Molnár, P., Tóth, E., Tóth, K., & Kárpáti, A. (2011). Networked laptops in Hungarian classrooms: Preliminary results of a research initiative. 53–58. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.11745.15200
Niraula, S. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT on academia: A comprehensive analy¬sis of AI policies across UT system academic institutions. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 4(1), 973–982. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2024.01.009
Peláez-Sánchez, I. C., Velarde-Camaqui, D., & Glasserman-Morales, L. D. (2024). The impact of large language models on higher education: Exploring the connection between AI and Education 4.0. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1392091. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1392091
Piaget, J. (1977). The Development of thought: Equilibration of cognitive structures. Viking Press. http://archive.org/details/developmentoftho00piag
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. Inter¬national Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.
Ülkü, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence-based large language models and integrity of exams and assignments in higher education: The case of tourism courses. Tourism & Management Studies, 19(4), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.18089/tms.2023.190402
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Pro¬cesses. Harvard University Press.
Yadav, A., Hong, H., & Stephenson, C. (2016). Computational Thinking for All: Pedagogical Approaches to Embedding 21st Century Problem Solving in K-12 Classrooms. TechTrends, 60(6), 565–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0087-7
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles published in the journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) 4.0 international license agreement and published open access, making them immediately and freely available to read and download. The CC-BY license agreement allows authors to retain copyright while allowing others to copy, distribute, and make some uses of the work.
Users have the right to copy, distribute and transmit an article, adapt the article and make commercial use of the article. The CC BY license permits commercial re-use of an open access article, as long as the author is properly attributed. This license permits, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided by the original work is properly cited.
Suitable reference form: Title of Article, Author, Journal Title, Volume, Issue.
If and when the manuscript is accepted for publication by the journal, the authors agree to automatically transfer the first right of publication to the journal, and permit the journal to apply a DOI to their articles and to archive them in databases and indexes. Copyrights for articles are retained by the authors.
