Large language models as collaborative learning partners in higher education: a theoretical framework

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14267/1588970X.2026.024

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, educational technology, collaborative learning, higher education, large language models, theoretical framework, I23, O33, I21

Abstract

The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into higher education environments reveals notable challenges within existing educational technology frameworks. Current theoretical models conceptualize artificial intelligence as an instrumental tool that supports human learning processes, yet numerous empirical studies demonstrate that LLMs function as collaborative learning partners with reciprocal agency, dynamic adaptation capabilities, and shared knowledge-construction behaviors. Research in Hungarian higher education contexts provides compelling evidence for this partnership phenomenon, with studies revealing that students primarily use AI systems for collaborative tasks such as brainstorming, information exploration, and iterative problem-solving rather than simple tool operation (Folmeg et al., 2024). I pro-pose the Collaborative Learning Partnership Model as a theoretical framework that reconceptualizes LLMs as active learning agents rather than passive educational instruments. Drawing from systematic analyses of recent implementation research across multiple educational domains, my model identifies four core components: reciprocal agency, dynamic contextual adaptation, shared knowledge construction, and transparent collaboration protocols. This frame-work addresses challenges in AI integration, including academic integrity concerns, assessment innovation, and pedagogical role transformation. The model provides a theoretical foundation for effective LLM integration while maintaining educational rigor and human agency in learning processes. Furthermore, I present a four-stage partnership development progression that guides practical implementation strategies.

References

Albadarneh, A. M., Daradkah, A. M., Telf, E. A., Haggag, H. M., Ghawanmeh, F. F., Al-Shunnaq, Y. A., Tawalbeh, M. S., Mahmoud, A. M. A., Shahine, K., & Daradkah, H. S. (2024). Integrating Artificial Intelligence-Powered Large Language Models in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Teacher Education Programs. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences, 22(1), 2184–2191. https://doi.org/10.57239/PJLSS-2024-22.1.00219

Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Prentice Hall.

Barkley, E. F., Major, C. H., & Cross, K. P. (2014). Collaborative Learning Techniques: A Handbook for College Faculty (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Berbenyuk, A., Powell, L., & Zary, N. (2024). Feasibility and Educational Value of Clinical Cases Generated Using Large Language Models. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 316, 1524–1528. https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI240705

Claman, D., & Sezgin, E. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Dental Education: Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models and Multimodal Foundation Models. JMIR Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.2196/52346

Csapó, B., & Molnár, G. (2019). Online Diagnostic Assessment in Support of Per¬sonalized Teaching and Learning: The eDia System. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01522

Downes, S. (2012). Connectivism and Connective Knowledge: Essays on Meaning and Learning Networks. National Research Council Canada.

Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Orienta-konsultit.

Folmeg, M., Fekete, I., & Koris, R. (2024). Towards identifying the components of students’ AI literacy: An exploratory study based on Hungarian higher edu¬cation students’ perceptions. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Prac¬tice, 21. https://doi.org/10.53761/wzyrwj33

Gao, L., Madaan, A., Zhou, S., Alon, U., Liu, P., Yang, Y., Callan, J., & Neubig, G. (2023). PAL: Program-aided Language Models. 10764–10799. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.10435

Horvath, L. (2023). Adaptive pedagogical strategies responding to emergency remote teaching – immediate responses of Hungarian primary school teach¬ers. Research in Learning Technology, 31. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v31.2978

Horvath, L., Helga, M., Hülber, L., Papp-Danka, A., Pintér, T., & Dringó-Horváth, I. (2020). Tanárképzők digitális kompetenciájának mérése – a DigCompEdu adaptálása a hazai felsőoktatási környezetre. Neveléstudomány, 8, 5–25. https://doi.org/10.21549/NTNY.29.2020.2.1

Horváth, L., M. Pintér, T., Misley, H., & Dringó-Horváth, I. (2025). Validity evi¬dence regarding the use of DigCompEdu as a self-reflection tool: The case of Hungarian teacher educators. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12914-6

Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001

Jošt, G., Taneski, V., & Karakatič, S. (2024). The Impact of Large Language Models on Programming Education and Student Learning Outcomes. Applied Sci¬ences, 14(10), 4115. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14104115

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Karabacak, M., Ozkara, B. B., Margetis, K., Wintermark, M., & Bisdas, S. (2023). The Advent of Generative Language Models in Medical Education. JMIR Med¬ical Education, 9(1), e48163. https://doi.org/10.2196/48163

Kétyi, A., Géring, Z., & Dén-Nagy, I. (2024). ChatGPT from the students’ point of view – Lessons from a pilot study using ChatGPT in business higher edu¬cation. Society and Economy, 47(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1556/204.2024.00007

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355

Lee, A. V. Y., Teo, C. L., & Tan, S. C. (2024). Prompt Engineering for Knowledge Creation: Using Chain-of-Thought to Support Students’ Improvable Ideas. AI, 5(3), 1446–1461. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai5030069

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowl¬edge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Molnár, G., & Csapó, B. (2023). Report on Smart Education in Hungary. In R. Zhuang, D. Liu, D. Sampson, D. Mandic, S. Zou, Y. Huang, & R. Huang (Eds.), Smart Education in China and Central & Eastern European Countries (pp. 155– 178). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7319-2_7

Molnár, P., Tóth, E., Tóth, K., & Kárpáti, A. (2011). Networked laptops in Hungarian classrooms: Preliminary results of a research initiative. 53–58. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.11745.15200

Niraula, S. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT on academia: A comprehensive analy¬sis of AI policies across UT system academic institutions. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 4(1), 973–982. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2024.01.009

Peláez-Sánchez, I. C., Velarde-Camaqui, D., & Glasserman-Morales, L. D. (2024). The impact of large language models on higher education: Exploring the connection between AI and Education 4.0. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1392091. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1392091

Piaget, J. (1977). The Development of thought: Equilibration of cognitive structures. Viking Press. http://archive.org/details/developmentoftho00piag

Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. Inter¬national Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.

Ülkü, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence-based large language models and integrity of exams and assignments in higher education: The case of tourism courses. Tourism & Management Studies, 19(4), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.18089/tms.2023.190402

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Pro¬cesses. Harvard University Press.

Yadav, A., Hong, H., & Stephenson, C. (2016). Computational Thinking for All: Pedagogical Approaches to Embedding 21st Century Problem Solving in K-12 Classrooms. TechTrends, 60(6), 565–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0087-7

Additional Files

Published

2026-09-24

Issue

Section

Online first

How to Cite

Biczó, Z. B. (2026). Large language models as collaborative learning partners in higher education: a theoretical framework. Society and Economy in Central and Eastern Europe, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.14267/1588970X.2026.024