Does accounting reflect or construct the business reality?
Empirical evidence from Hungarian accounting professionals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14267/1588970X.2026.026Keywords:
accounting regulation, financial reporting, accounting perception, social construction, professional judgment, M41, M48Abstract
This study examines how Hungarian accounting professionals interpret the role of financial statements in practice, whether they primarily view them as objective information tools that faithfully reflect economic events, or as professional practices that actively shape business reality through regulation and professional judgment. The empirical analysis is based on questionnaire data collected in July 2025 from members of two Hungarian accounting professional organizations, yielding 491 valid responses. Using non-parametric statistical methods, the study tests three hypotheses. The “equally correct but different” representation of economic events under IFRS and Hungarian accounting regulation (H1) and the perceived potential for deliberate distortion through valuation practices (H2) are examined using one-sample Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, while the social constructionist interpretation of accounting (H3) is explored through correlation analysis and principal component analysis (PCA). The results confirm H1 and H2, the majority of respondents accept the context-dependent relativity of accounting representations and clearly recognize the possibility of consciously shaping financial statements through valuation decisions. The items capturing the constructionist dimension show significant positive correlations, and PCA reveals a single, coherent factor. Overall, the findings indicate that Hungarian accounting professionals simultaneously embrace the normative “true and fair view” paradigm and a reflexive, social constructionist understanding of accounting.
References
Alexander, D., & Eberhartinger, E. (2009). The true and fair view in the European Union. European Accounting Review, 18(3), 571–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180902784405
Barker, R., Penman, S., Linsmeier, T. J., & Cooper, S. (2020). moving the conceptual framework forward: Accounting for uncertainty. Contemporary Accounting Research, 37(1), 322–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12585
Barth, M. E. (2008). Global financial reporting: Implications for U.S. academics. The Accounting Review, 83(5), 1159–1179. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.5.1159
Barth, M. E., Landsman, W. R., & Lang, M. H. (2008). International accounting standards and accounting quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(3), 467– 498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00287.x
Bissessur, S., Litjens, R., & Ormazabal, G. (2025). Enforcement of financial reporting regulation in the EU: New data. European Accounting Review, 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2025.2565468
Bozkurt, O., Islamoğlu, M., & Öz, Y. (2013). Perceptions of professionals interested in accounting and auditing about acceptance and adaptation of global financial reporting standards. Journal of Economics Finance and Administrative Science, 18(34), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2077-1886(13)70019-2
Burgstahler, D., & Dichev, I. (1997). Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24(1), 99–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(97)00017-7
Chahed, Y. (2021). Words and numbers: Financialization and accounting standard setting in the United Kingdom. Contemporary Accounting Research, 38(1), 302–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12614
Cohen, D. A., Dey, A., & Lys, T. Z. (2008). Real and accrual-based earnings management in the pre- and post-Sarbanes-Oxley periods. The Accounting Review, 83(3), 757–787. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.3.757
Cohen, D., Pandit, S., Wasley, C. E., & Zach, T. (2020). Measuring real activity management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 37(2), 1172–1198. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12553
Daske, H., Hail, L., Leuz, C., & Verdi, R. (2008). Mandatory IFRS reporting around the world: Early evidence on the economic consequences. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(5), 1085–1142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00306.x
Datar, S., Kulp, S. C., & Lambert, R. A. (2001). Balancing performance measures. Journal of Accounting Research, 39(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00004
De Luca, F., Prather-Kinsey, J., Erdogan, S., & Phan, H.-T.-P. (2024). Cross-border listed firms’ IFRS-based financial reports: Are they comparable? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 45, 107207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2024.107207
Dechow, P. M., & Dichev, I. D. (2002). The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review, 77(s-1), 35–59. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1.35
Field, A. (2018). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th edition). SAGE.
Francis, J., LaFond, R., Olsson, P. M., & Schipper, K. (2004). Costs of equity and earnings attributes. The Accounting Review, 79(4), 967–1010. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2004.79.4.967
Friedrich, J., Kunkel, T., & Thiemann, M. (2024). Becoming influential: Strategies of control, expertise, and socialisation in transnational governance of accounting regulation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 113, 101566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2024.101566
Georgiou, O. (2024). The politics of prudence in accounting standards. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 113, 101571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2024.101571
Glaum, M., Schmidt, P., Street, D. L., & Vogel, S. (2013). Compliance with IFRS 3- and IAS 36-required disclosures across 17 European countries: Company- and country-level determinants. Accounting and Business Research, 43(3), 163–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2012.711131
Grosu, V., Cosmulese, C. G., Socoliuc, M., Ciubotariu, M.-S., & Mihaila, S. (2023). Testing accountants’ perceptions of the digitization of the profession and profiling the future professional. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 193, 122630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122630
Hair, J. F. (Ed.). (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed). Pearson Prentice Hall.
Healy, P. M. (1985). The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7(1–3), 85–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(85)90029-1
Healy, P. M., & Wahlen, J. M. (1999). A Review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons, 13(4), 365–383. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.1999.13.4.365
Hines, R. D. (1988). Financial accounting: In communicating reality, we construct reality. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13(3), 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(88)90003-7
Hopwood, A. G. (2009). Accounting and the environment. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(3–4), 433–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.03.002
Jones, J. J. (1991). Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(2), 193. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491047
Kothari, S. P., Leone, A. J., & Wasley, C. E. (2005). Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 163–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.11.002
Leuz, C., Nanda, D., & Wysocki, P. D. (2003). Earnings management and investor protection: An international comparison. Journal of Financial Economics, 69(3), 505–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00121-1
Morgan, G. (1988). Accounting as reality construction: Towards a new epistemology for accounting practice. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13(5), 477– 485. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(88)90018-9
Mouritsen, J. (1994). Rationality, institutions and decision making: Reflections on March and Olsen’s rediscovering institutions. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19(2), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(94)90018-3
Nguyen, T. T. H., Ibrahim, S., & Giannopoulos, G. (2023). Detecting earnings management: A comparison of accrual and real earnings manipulation models. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 24(2), 344–379. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-08-2021-0217
Nobes, C. (2013). The continued survival of international differences under IFRS. Accounting and Business Research, 43(2), 83–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2013.770644
Nobes, C., & Stadler, C. (2024). Deviations from the mandatory adoption of IFRS in Europe? Why non-adoption does not mean non-compliance. European Accounting Review, 33(4), 1497–1519. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2023.2197248
Roychowdhury, S. (2006). Earnings management through real activities manipulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(3), 335–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2006.01.002
Soderstrom, N. S., & Sun, K. J. (2007). IFRS adoption and accounting quality: A review. European Accounting Review, 16(4), 675–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180701706732
Tarca, A. (2020). The IASB and comparability of international financial reporting: Research evidence and implications. Australian Accounting Review, 30(4), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12326
Yan, H., Liu, Z., Wang, H., Zhang, X., & Zheng, X. (2022). How does the COVID- 19 affect earnings management: Empirical evidence from China. Research in International Business and Finance, 63, 101772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101772
Zhang, Y., & Andrew, J. (2022). Financialisation and the conceptual framework: An update. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 88, 102322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2021.102322
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 István Fábics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles published in the journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) 4.0 international license agreement and published open access, making them immediately and freely available to read and download. The CC-BY license agreement allows authors to retain copyright while allowing others to copy, distribute, and make some uses of the work.
Users have the right to copy, distribute and transmit an article, adapt the article and make commercial use of the article. The CC BY license permits commercial re-use of an open access article, as long as the author is properly attributed. This license permits, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided by the original work is properly cited.
Suitable reference form: Title of Article, Author, Journal Title, Volume, Issue.
If and when the manuscript is accepted for publication by the journal, the authors agree to automatically transfer the first right of publication to the journal, and permit the journal to apply a DOI to their articles and to archive them in databases and indexes. Copyrights for articles are retained by the authors.
