Security Sector Reform, Small Arms and Light Weapons and Gender in the Post-Conflict Western Balkans

Authors

  • Eszter Szeldacsek

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14267/cojourn.2019v4n1a4

Abstract

We all experience war in a different way – building peace in post-conflict environments requires solutions that bring together various aspects of these experiences at the local, national and international levels. However, the actors involved and the social groups they address are only rarely those at the margin, and the diversity of the catch-all category of “locals” frequently goes unacknowledged when considering Security Sector Reform (SSR) and especially small arms2 control. Numerous studies have focused on SSR and gender in the Balkans, on perceptions of security in post-conflict environments and its gender-related aspects, as well as on the gendered aspects of small arms, but so far the analysis bringing together all of these aspects is scarce. This paper aims to address this gap, providing an overview of these areas to show that attempts at state-building and security-provision in the Western Balkans have failed to appropriately incorporate gender mainstreaming into their agendas. It is the central claim of this paper that policymakers must realize that gender mainstreaming without a broader understanding of gendered aspects of security does not and will not have transformative power – neither in the Western Balkans, nor in other post-conflict environments.

Author Biography

Eszter Szeldacsek

Eszter Szedlacsek is a Postgraduate Public Policy student at  Central European University (CEU) and University of York (UK). She has formerly been affiliated with the Global Public Policy Institute (GPPi) and the European Parliament. Her main areas of research include operations in post-conflict environments, gender, security sector reform, and EU security policy.

Downloads

Published

2019-09-09

How to Cite

Szeldacsek, E. (2019) “Security Sector Reform, Small Arms and Light Weapons and Gender in the Post-Conflict Western Balkans”, Corvinus Journal of International Affairs, 4(1), pp. 26–38. doi: 10.14267/cojourn.2019v4n1a4.